Hi, On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 7:49 PM, Wolfgang Rosenauer wrote: Am 20.12.2010 13:42, schrieb Masim "Vavai" Sugianto: > I would like to implement DKIM/DomainKeys for my mail server but > curious while searching DKIM package on OBS. What is the different > between DKIM-Milter and Perl-Mail-DKIM and which one should be applied > to my mail server (based on Postfix) I have DKIM integrated in amavisd-new in one of my mailservers. On another older one I'm using dkim-milter. So if you are using amavis already I'd recommend using that and otherwise look into dkim-milter? Thank you for the response. I'm currently using Zimbra and found that amavisd-new 2.6 doesn't support LDAP as required by Zimbra. Amavisd-new DKIM signature was applied successfully using Postfix as medwinz reply and the above answer, but I need come clarification between DKIM and DomainKeys. What is dkim-milter function ? as verifier or signer ? I'm also trying to implement OpenDKIM. Message was successfully contains DKIM signature (pass on Gmail and Yahoo) but DomainKeys was noted as neutral. I'm confused about the different function between DKIM & DomainKeys, between dkim-milter, opendkim, dk-filter and dk-milter function. Below are my test check : elandsys : DKIM Signature validation: pass (1024-bit key) DomainKeys Signature validation: not available check-auth@verifier.port25.com; : ========================================================== Summary of Results ========================================================== SPF check: pass DomainKeys check: neutral DKIM check: pass Sender-ID check: pass SpamAssassin check: ham ========================================================== Details: ========================================================== HELO hostname: mx3.domain.id Source IP: 202.158.xxx.xxx mail-from: vavai@domain.id ---------------------------------------------------------- SPF check details: ---------------------------------------------------------- Result: pass ID(s) verified: smtp.mail=vavai@domain.id DNS record(s): domain.id. SPF (no records) domain.id. 172800 IN TXT "v=spf1 a mx include:mail.domain.id ~all" domain.id. 172800 IN A 174.120.xxx.xxx domain.id. 172800 IN MX 0 mail.domain.id. mail.domain.id. 172800 IN A 202.158.xxx.xxx ---------------------------------------------------------- DomainKeys check details: ---------------------------------------------------------- Result: neutral (message not signed) ID(s) verified: header.From=vavai@domain.id DNS record(s): ---------------------------------------------------------- DKIM check details: ---------------------------------------------------------- Result: pass (matches From: vavai@domain.id) ID(s) verified: header.d=domain.id -- Best Regards, Masim "Vavai" Sugianto -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org

Hi Wolfgang, On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Wolfgang Rosenauer wrote:

Hi,

DKIM is more or less the successor of domainkeys. Basically the improved version which is recommended nowadays. For details about the differences you can try Google.

Thank you for the clarification. According to the above explanation, I would go with DKIM sign without worry about DomainKeys ? I know that DKIM was means "DomainKeys Identified Mail". I asked this because my email was successfully mark by Gmail as "signed by mydomain.tld" but Yahoo marks as : mta130.mail.sp2.yahoo.com from=mydomain.tld; domainkeys=neutral (no sig); from=mydomain.tld; dkim=pass (ok) Actually, my email sent to Yahoo inbox sucessfully, just worry why Yahoo mark it "domainkeys=neutral (no sig)" -- Best Regards, Masim "Vavai" Sugianto -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org