installing suse 9.3 on an athlon64 fx 3200+
Reading the Admin. book I see where it says don't use both 32 bit pkgs. and the ones intended for 64bit procs noted by not haveing foo32 in title. However, When I try to mark those choices , where there are choices, as do not install it marks them anyway. How do I know what I need , precisely to get the box up and running? ( Or do I mark the 32 bit files as "taboo" ? ) Most confusing ... I await answers from the list wizards .. BTW, whomever it was that wrote the cute little script that told me I was about to install a 32 bit OS on a 64 bit system .. kudos, it made me laugh ! It said , when I plopped a cd into the dvd drive, "cool computer, you are going to install a 32bit system on it ? " Right now,I am sooooo confused ... And this is one place that the book has only confused me more. Obviously my reading skills have suffered. <sigh> -- j registered linux user #363029 Mornings: Evolution in action. Only the grumpy will survive.
On Saturday 01 October 2005 00:05, jfweber@bellsouth.net wrote:
Reading the Admin. book I see where it says don't use both 32 bit pkgs. and the ones intended for 64bit procs noted by not haveing foo32 in title. However, When I try to mark those choices , where there are choices, as do not install it marks them anyway. How do I know what I need , precisely to get the box up and running? ( Or do I mark the 32 bit files as "taboo" ? )
Most confusing ...
The ones you see in YaST are safe. The admonishion to not use 32 bit packages doesn't mean that you shouldn't use the ones tagged -32bit, it means you shouldn't use the ones called .i586.rpm, but you don't see those in YaST, so you're quite safe. The packages called -32bit are there for compatibility, so you can run 32 bit packages on your 64 bit system, but they won't screw anything up for your normal everyday 64 bit experience
participants (2)
-
Anders Johansson
-
jfweber@bellsouth.net