[opensuse] 12.1 Yast CA Management broken
Hi Yast CA management module is broken in both 32 and 64 bit versions of 12.1 I've filed a buzilla under 'other' as there is no section for 12.1 bugs as of an hour or so ago. The error is: Error while creating client module ca_mgm Meanwhile, can anyone recommend a tool where I can create a CA certificate to sign a servercert and key to use with the ldap module? I need to be able to specify the CN of the cert. Thanks L x -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On Sat, 2011-11-19 at 22:07 +0100, lynn wrote:
Hi Yast CA management module is broken in both 32 and 64 bit versions of 12.1 I've filed a buzilla under 'other' as there is no section for 12.1 bugs as of an hour or so ago. The error is:
Error while creating client module ca_mgm
Meanwhile, can anyone recommend a tool where I can create a CA certificate to sign a servercert and key to use with the ldap module? I need to be able to specify the CN of the cert.
bad news indeed! Regarding an alternative, you can use (in chronological order of complexity and functionality) a) openssl commandline b) easyrsa (rather simple cli tool, part of openvpn) c) tinyca d) openxpki (OBS: home:/computersalat:/OpenXPKI/) e) ejbca If just for a single certificate, openssl should be enough hw -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On 20/11/11 00:25, Hans Witvliet wrote:
On Sat, 2011-11-19 at 22:07 +0100, lynn wrote:
Hi Yast CA management module is broken in both 32 and 64 bit versions of 12.1 I've filed a buzilla under 'other' as there is no section for 12.1 bugs as of an hour or so ago. The error is:
Error while creating client module ca_mgm
Meanwhile, can anyone recommend a tool where I can create a CA certificate to sign a servercert and key to use with the ldap module? I need to be able to specify the CN of the cert.
bad news indeed!
Regarding an alternative, you can use (in chronological order of complexity and functionality) a) openssl commandline b) easyrsa (rather simple cli tool, part of openvpn) c) tinyca d) openxpki (OBS: home:/computersalat:/OpenXPKI/) e) ejbca
If just for a single certificate, openssl should be enough
hw
OK I'll go with openssl. If anyone has time (yeah, I know. . .) do you think this would work with 12.1: http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/ch-ldap-tls.html looks like the /etc/openldap for copying the certificates to folders are correct at least. Thanks. L x -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 12:16 PM, lynn <lynn@steve-ss.com> wrote:
OK I'll go with openssl. If anyone has time (yeah, I know. . .) do you think this would work with 12.1:
http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/ch-ldap-tls.html
looks like the /etc/openldap for copying the certificates to folders are correct at least.
Looks OK. The basic fundamentals are there. The openssl command line has all the options to create a certificate if that is your final objective. Search keywords "creating certs with openssl" (Google) will give you a couple of links from openssl website with instructions for certs. Ref <http://www.openssl.org/docs/apps/ca.html> HTH, -- Arun Khan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On 20/11/11 08:12, Arun Khan wrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 12:16 PM, lynn<lynn@steve-ss.com> wrote:
OK I'll go with openssl. If anyone has time (yeah, I know. . .) do you think this would work with 12.1:
http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/ch-ldap-tls.html
looks like the /etc/openldap for copying the certificates to folders are correct at least.
Looks OK. The basic fundamentals are there.
The openssl command line has all the options to create a certificate if that is your final objective.
Search keywords "creating certs with openssl" (Google) will give you a couple of links from openssl website with instructions for certs.
Ref<http://www.openssl.org/docs/apps/ca.html>
HTH, -- Arun Khan
Basically, I need it for the Yast LDAP Server TLS dialogue and need to know where to point it for the CA cert, the servercert and the serverkey. I think that this is what the link shows. Thanks L x -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday, 2011-11-19 at 22:07 +0100, lynn wrote:
I've filed a buzilla under 'other' as there is no section for 12.1 bugs as of an hour or so ago.
Product 12.1, which is the important one, is there. The OS 12.1 is not there, and I have a bugzilla for that. - -- Cheers, Carlos E. R. (from 11.4 x86_64 "Celadon" at Telcontar) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk7JjjUACgkQtTMYHG2NR9V5CwCfVIRsAr1Ipuu15hxZfZxfwI/s hKIAn3vREU/sWpkPbDD7EKfoZutsI+2z =Vli3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
I've filed a buzilla under 'other' as there is no section for 12.1 bugs as of an hour or so ago.
Product 12.1, which is the important one, is there. The OS 12.1 is not there, and I have a bugzilla for that.
Is this in the right place? https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731557 Saludos L x -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On Monday 21 Nov 2011 07:54:43 lynn wrote:
Is this in the right place? https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731557
Yes, thanks for reporting. Will -- Will Stephenson, openSUSE Team SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Monday, 2011-11-21 at 07:54 +0100, lynn wrote:
Product 12.1, which is the important one, is there. The OS 12.1 is not there, and I have a bugzilla for that.
Is this in the right place? https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731557
Yes, the product is 12.1, so correct. The OS field you set to "other", as 12.1 does not exist yet (no idea why not). :-) - -- Cheers, Carlos E. R. (from 11.4 x86_64 "Celadon" at Telcontar) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk7K50kACgkQtTMYHG2NR9VpXACfZ2Qpwbj2NJiYIYM1vc9FrD1z raIAn2tsEyTmlfVXBfU4c/RfRCSL/0VI =9ehV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On Tuesday, November 22, 2011 01:05:29 AM Carlos E. R. wrote:
On Monday, 2011-11-21 at 07:54 +0100, lynn wrote:
Product 12.1, which is the important one, is there. The OS 12.1 is not there, and I have a bugzilla for that.
Is this in the right place? https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731557
Yes, the product is 12.1, so correct. The OS field you set to "other", as 12.1 does not exist yet (no idea why not).
:-) Its a bug. They have yet to hammer it out. -- Roger Luedecke openSUSE Ambassador Ind. Repairs and Consulting **Looking for a C++ etc. mentor*** -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Monday, 2011-11-21 at 16:22 -0800, Roger Luedecke wrote:
Yes, the product is 12.1, so correct. The OS field you set to "other", as 12.1 does not exist yet (no idea why not).
:-) Its a bug. They have yet to hammer it out.
I know, I reported it. I don't know why it takes so much time to correct it, just add a name to a list - but then I don't know how difficult it is to do such things to the bugzilla system, maybe it needs a reboot and that needs to be scheduled. No idea. - -- Cheers, Carlos E. R. (from 11.4 x86_64 "Celadon" at Telcontar) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk7LAxAACgkQtTMYHG2NR9VcEgCfYawLeK1WmZPn4z0/byQm76kl hQEAoImxQua0weUKLAUN9Jax2vBiHhEf =gqxq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On Tuesday, November 22, 2011 03:03:45 AM Carlos E. R. wrote:
On Monday, 2011-11-21 at 16:22 -0800, Roger Luedecke wrote:
Yes, the product is 12.1, so correct. The OS field you set to "other", as 12.1 does not exist yet (no idea why not).
:-)
Its a bug. They have yet to hammer it out.
I know, I reported it. I don't know why it takes so much time to correct it, just add a name to a list - but then I don't know how difficult it is to do such things to the bugzilla system, maybe it needs a reboot and that needs to be scheduled. No idea. Heaven knows where they are working on things already anyway. -- Roger Luedecke openSUSE Ambassador Ind. Repairs and Consulting **Looking for a C++ etc. mentor*** -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 03:03:45AM +0100, Carlos E. R. wrote:
On Monday, 2011-11-21 at 16:22 -0800, Roger Luedecke wrote:
Yes, the product is 12.1, so correct. The OS field you set to "other", as 12.1 does not exist yet (no idea why not).
:-) Its a bug. They have yet to hammer it out.
I know, I reported it. I don't know why it takes so much time to correct it, just add a name to a list - but then I don't know how difficult it is to do such things to the bugzilla system, maybe it needs a reboot and that needs to be scheduled. No idea.
Please include the bug ID for reference if you talk about a report. If you report it _only_ to this list, by phone, to your dog, or wife I have to stress that it is important to use the defined bug reporting interface. "I can't file this bug as the OS 12.1 is missing" is the answer I expect anyhow. ;) Thanks. Lars -- Lars Müller [ˈlaː(r)z ˈmʏlɐ] Samba Team SUSE Linux, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
On 22/11/11 09:52, Lars Müller wrote:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 03:03:45AM +0100, Carlos E. R. wrote:
On Monday, 2011-11-21 at 16:22 -0800, Roger Luedecke wrote:
Yes, the product is 12.1, so correct. The OS field you set to "other", as 12.1 does not exist yet (no idea why not).
:-) Its a bug. They have yet to hammer it out.
I know, I reported it. I don't know why it takes so much time to correct it, just add a name to a list - but then I don't know how difficult it is to do such things to the bugzilla system, maybe it needs a reboot and that needs to be scheduled. No idea.
Please include the bug ID for reference if you talk about a report.
If you report it _only_ to this list, by phone, to your dog, or wife I have to stress that it is important to use the defined bug reporting interface.
"I can't file this bug as the OS 12.1 is missing" is the answer I expect anyhow. ;)
Thanks.
Lars My dog informs me that it being dealt with ;)
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730889 L x -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Content-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1111240248480.2439@Telcontar.valinor> On Tuesday, 2011-11-22 at 09:52 +0100, Lars Müller wrote:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 03:03:45AM +0100, Carlos E. R. wrote:
Please include the bug ID for reference if you talk about a report.
Why? The people that handle the bugs should already have read it and acted. No need to tell them in this list. Anyway: : [Bug 729342] New: I can not select as OS 12.1
If you report it _only_ to this list, by phone, to your dog, or wife I have to stress that it is important to use the defined bug reporting interface.
I filed it on Bugzilla days ago. On 9 Nov 2011, to be exact. - -- Cheers, Carlos E. R. (from 11.4 x86_64 "Celadon" at Telcontar) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk7NotgACgkQtTMYHG2NR9WMUgCfTezmTKriQqynUv6f6eTHoPNC fawAoIyx9PwkJ8JCbKsasnvLZ+EskuqR =x0il -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 02:50:16AM +0100, Carlos E. R. wrote:
On Tuesday, 2011-11-22 at 09:52 +0100, Lars Müller wrote:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 03:03:45AM +0100, Carlos E. R. wrote:
Please include the bug ID for reference if you talk about a report.
Why? The people that handle the bugs should already have read it and acted. No need to tell them in this list.
Cause if the bug ID is available from the list archive it allows other to follow the issue too. There are curious people out there and some are willing to drive bugs forward. This is nothing more than a polite suggestion to make colaboration easier if not possible at all.
Anyway:
: [Bug 729342] New: I can not select as OS 12.1
See, someone asked Coolo how to process this issue further. This would not have been possible without the bug ID. Lars -- Lars Müller [ˈlaː(r)z ˈmʏlɐ] Samba Team SUSE Linux, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday, 2011-11-24 at 16:16 +0100, Lars Müller wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 02:50:16AM +0100, Carlos E. R. wrote:
Why? The people that handle the bugs should already have read it and acted. No need to tell them in this list.
Cause if the bug ID is available from the list archive it allows other to follow the issue too. There are curious people out there and some are willing to drive bugs forward.
If anybody is curious, then they ask. Otherwise I have to look in my long list of bugzillas to find the one, which takes some time :-p (postponing the email, switching folders, searching on text field, selecting text, going back to original folder, continuing with previous post, paste the text).
Anyway:
: [Bug 729342] New: I can not select as OS 12.1
See, someone asked Coolo how to process this issue further. This would not have been possible without the bug ID.
I know, saw it, thanks. But it should not be necessary if the bugzilla system worked better. Many bugs take weeks, even months, till someone passes by and says something. It is discouraging. - -- Cheers, Carlos E. R. (from 11.4 x86_64 "Celadon" at Telcontar) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk7O6tMACgkQtTMYHG2NR9Xq7QCfcPA50behHkugJXtmrOv/vWj0 6O8An2NRfIixSkCyCdClT4uZpgG5Y1+7 =YWh0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 02:09:31AM +0100, Carlos E. R. wrote:
On Thursday, 2011-11-24 at 16:16 +0100, Lars Müller wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 02:50:16AM +0100, Carlos E. R. wrote:
Why? The people that handle the bugs should already have read it and acted. No need to tell them in this list.
Cause if the bug ID is available from the list archive it allows other to follow the issue too. There are curious people out there and some are willing to drive bugs forward.
If anybody is curious, then they ask. Otherwise I have to look in my long list of bugzillas to find the one, which takes some time :-p
Hopeless. You know anything better. Even if you get it explained.
Anyway:
: [Bug 729342] New: I can not select as OS 12.1
See, someone asked Coolo how to process this issue further. This would not have been possible without the bug ID.
I know, saw it, thanks. But it should not be necessary if the bugzilla system worked better. Many bugs take weeks, even months, till someone passes by and says something. It is discouraging.
For 97.8734% of the issue it's possible to check with the osc tool who is the bug owner. For those willing to share the workload. Lars -- Lars Müller [ˈlaː(r)z ˈmʏlɐ] Samba Team SUSE Linux, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
participants (7)
-
Arun Khan -
Carlos E. R. -
Hans Witvliet -
Lars Müller -
lynn -
Roger Luedecke -
Will Stephenson