Re: [SLE] SuSE Newbie: Why does SuSE use custom RPMs?
Hello John,
2.4 is different from 2.2 with a captial D for different :-), found that out...
Not sure what other extras will be needed....Anyone from SuSE know the answer to this one?
You mentioned that you are new to SuSE? What were you using before, if I may ask?
Matt
On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, John Smiley wrote:
Matt,
I was hesitant about forcing the modutils install. I didn't know if it would break some of the "added extras" that SuSE provides. What are some of these extras? Would the inclusion of the raw I/O patch, lvm, and reiserfs in the SuSE 7.0 kernel be good examples? I can obtain all of these from their respective distribution sites. What other extras should I be aware of?
Thanks,
John
----- Original Message ----- From: "Matthew"
To: "John Smiley" Cc: Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 2:43 PM Subject: Re: [SLE] SuSE Newbie: Why does SuSE use custom RPMs? Hi John,
You may need to force the installation of Modutils, I got mine here: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/kernel/modutils/v2.4/
With the SuSE Kernels you get added extras that few others offer. And for otehr apps the ones you get with SuSE should have gone through a QA process too.
Matt
On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, John Smiley wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: John Smiley To: suse-linux-e@suse.com Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 12:10 PM Subject: SuSE Newbie: Why does SuSE use custom RPMs?
I am new to SuSE linux and have been having a hard time getting
used to the use of "SuSE RPMs" as opposed to the usual RPMs I see posted everywhere on the web. For example, it's easy to find 'modutils-x.x.x.rpm' to update the latest version of modutils on most linux distributions, but SuSE uses 'modules.rpm'. And if I try to instal the modutils rpm from say, SourceForge, I get a message saying that it conflicts with files in SuSE's 'modules' package.
Another example: SuSE uses lx-suse.rpm and lx-hack.rpm for the
"official" and "non-supported" versions of the kernel. Everyone else seems to simply use linux-2.x.x. It's especially hard to determine the version number of a SuSE RPM without querying it from rpm. The standard I see everywhere else is to include the version number in the rpm file name.
This is making it extremely hard for me to experiment. I would
Matt,
I was using Red Hat. I got turned off by the problems they introduced in
7.0 with their introduction of the not-yet-ready-for-prime-time glibc 2.2
package. I switched to SuSE when I saw how well the supported Oracle and I
really like the docs supplied in the distro. Much better than RH. My main
gripe is SuSE's seemingly non-standard way of packaging RPMs.
John
----- Original Message -----
From: "Matthew"
Please help. I'm very impressed by the amount of support SuSE
to try the new 2.4.x kernel, and I've seen the posts about downloading an rpm from ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mantel/next/ , but this is hardly main stream! I don't want to depend on someone else to put together a package that is compatible with SuSE. I want to download the kernel from ftp.kernel.org, read the Changes docs, download the appropriate versions of the required packages and compile my kernel. provides, especially where Oracle is concerned.
Regards,
John R. Smiley
John Smiley writes:
Matt,
I was using Red Hat. I got turned off by the problems they introduced in 7.0 with their introduction of the not-yet-ready-for-prime-time glibc 2.2 package. I switched to SuSE when I saw how well the supported Oracle and I really like the docs supplied in the distro. Much better than RH. My main gripe is SuSE's seemingly non-standard way of packaging RPMs.
You mean there's a standard, or the way Redhat chooses to do it. The RPM package manager was never meant to be distribution generic.
John
----- Original Message ----- From: "Matthew"
To: "John Smiley" Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 3:18 PM Subject: Re: [SLE] SuSE Newbie: Why does SuSE use custom RPMs? Hello John,
2.4 is different from 2.2 with a captial D for different :-), found that out...
Not sure what other extras will be needed....Anyone from SuSE know the answer to this one?
You mentioned that you are new to SuSE? What were you using before, if I may ask?
Matt
On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, John Smiley wrote:
Matt,
I was hesitant about forcing the modutils install. I didn't know if it would break some of the "added extras" that SuSE provides. What are some of these extras? Would the inclusion of the raw I/O patch, lvm, and reiserfs in the SuSE 7.0 kernel be good examples? I can obtain all of these from their respective distribution sites. What other extras should I be aware of?
Thanks,
John
----- Original Message ----- From: "Matthew"
To: "John Smiley" Cc: Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 2:43 PM Subject: Re: [SLE] SuSE Newbie: Why does SuSE use custom RPMs? Hi John,
You may need to force the installation of Modutils, I got mine here: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/kernel/modutils/v2.4/
With the SuSE Kernels you get added extras that few others offer. And for otehr apps the ones you get with SuSE should have gone through a QA process too.
Matt
On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, John Smiley wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: John Smiley To: suse-linux-e@suse.com Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 12:10 PM Subject: SuSE Newbie: Why does SuSE use custom RPMs?
I am new to SuSE linux and have been having a hard time getting
used to the use of "SuSE RPMs" as opposed to the usual RPMs I see posted everywhere on the web. For example, it's easy to find 'modutils-x.x.x.rpm' to update the latest version of modutils on most linux distributions, but SuSE uses 'modules.rpm'. And if I try to instal the modutils rpm from say, SourceForge, I get a message saying that it conflicts with files in SuSE's 'modules' package.
Another example: SuSE uses lx-suse.rpm and lx-hack.rpm for the
"official" and "non-supported" versions of the kernel. Everyone else seems to simply use linux-2.x.x. It's especially hard to determine the version number of a SuSE RPM without querying it from rpm. The standard I see everywhere else is to include the version number in the rpm file name.
This is making it extremely hard for me to experiment. I would
like to try the new 2.4.x kernel, and I've seen the posts about downloading an rpm from ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mantel/next/ , but this is hardly main stream! I don't want to depend on someone else to put together a package that is compatible with SuSE. I want to download the kernel from ftp.kernel.org, read the Changes docs, download the appropriate versions of the required packages and compile my kernel.
Please help. I'm very impressed by the amount of support SuSE
provides, especially where Oracle is concerned.
Regards,
John R. Smiley
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// // Name: Jesse Marlin // Intec Telecom Systems // // Voice: 404-705-2912 // 5775 Peachtree-Dunwoody Road, Bldg G // // Fax: 404-705-2805 // Atlanta, GA 30342 // // Email: jesse.marlin@intec-telecom-systems.com // // Web: http://www.intec-telecom-systems.com //
John Smiley writes:
Matt,
I was using Red Hat. I got turned off by the problems they introduced in 7.0 with their introduction of the not-yet-ready-for-prime-time glibc 2.2 package. I switched to SuSE when I saw how well the supported Oracle and I really like the docs supplied in the distro. Much better than RH. My
gripe is SuSE's seemingly non-standard way of packaging RPMs.
You mean there's a standard, or the way Redhat chooses to do it. The RPM package manager was never meant to be distribution generic.
John
----- Original Message ----- From: "Matthew"
To: "John Smiley" Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 3:18 PM Subject: Re: [SLE] SuSE Newbie: Why does SuSE use custom RPMs? Hello John,
2.4 is different from 2.2 with a captial D for different :-),
found
that out...
Not sure what other extras will be needed....Anyone from SuSE know
answer to this one?
You mentioned that you are new to SuSE? What were you using before, if I may ask?
Matt
On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, John Smiley wrote:
Matt,
I was hesitant about forcing the modutils install. I didn't know if it would break some of the "added extras" that SuSE provides. What are some of these extras? Would the inclusion of the raw I/O patch, lvm, and reiserfs in the SuSE 7.0 kernel be good examples? I can obtain all of these from their respective distribution sites. What other extras should I be aware of?
Thanks,
John
----- Original Message ----- From: "Matthew"
To: "John Smiley" Cc: Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 2:43 PM Subject: Re: [SLE] SuSE Newbie: Why does SuSE use custom RPMs? Hi John,
You may need to force the installation of Modutils, I got mine here: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/kernel/modutils/v2.4/
With the SuSE Kernels you get added extras that few others offer. And for otehr apps the ones you get with SuSE should have gone through a QA process too.
Matt
On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, John Smiley wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: John Smiley To: suse-linux-e@suse.com Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 12:10 PM Subject: SuSE Newbie: Why does SuSE use custom RPMs?
I am new to SuSE linux and have been having a hard time
getting used to the use of "SuSE RPMs" as opposed to the usual RPMs I see posted everywhere on the web. For example, it's easy to find 'modutils-x.x.x.rpm' to update the latest version of modutils on most linux distributions, but SuSE uses 'modules.rpm'. And if I try to instal the modutils rpm from say, SourceForge, I get a message saying that it conflicts with files in SuSE's 'modules' package.
Another example: SuSE uses lx-suse.rpm and lx-hack.rpm for
It isn't just RH that chooses this method. Every linux site that I've seen,
other than SuSE, uses the same standard.
John
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jesse Marlin"
This is making it extremely hard for me to experiment. I
would
Please help. I'm very impressed by the amount of support
SuSE
"official" and "non-supported" versions of the kernel. Everyone else seems to simply use linux-2.x.x. It's especially hard to determine the version number of a SuSE RPM without querying it from rpm. The standard I see everywhere else is to include the version number in the rpm file name. like to try the new 2.4.x kernel, and I've seen the posts about downloading an rpm from ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mantel/next/ , but this is hardly main stream! I don't want to depend on someone else to put together a package that is compatible with SuSE. I want to download the kernel from ftp.kernel.org, read the Changes docs, download the appropriate versions of the required packages and compile my kernel. provides, especially where Oracle is concerned.
Regards,
John R. Smiley
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// // Name: Jesse Marlin // Intec Telecom Systems // // Voice: 404-705-2912 // 5775 Peachtree-Dunwoody Road, Bldg G // // Fax: 404-705-2805 // Atlanta, GA 30342 // // Email: jesse.marlin@intec-telecom-systems.com // // Web: http://www.intec-telecom-systems.com //
On Fri, Feb 09, John Smiley wrote:
It isn't just RH that chooses this method. Every linux site that I've seen, other than SuSE, uses the same standard.
Which standard ? There is no standard. Look for example for glibc. Tell me 2 distributions (but not Red Hat based ones), that uses the same names for all glibc (with subpackages) RPMs. There are no 2 distributions. I know it, because I looked at it for some days. The most have a glibc main RPM, but not all. Some uses only libc or libc6. But then look at the subpackages for development, profiling and locale. Nothing common any longer. Or look at Debian. They have often names which are more similar to SuSE then to Red Hat. So, what is the standard ? Thorsten
John
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jesse Marlin"
To: "John Smiley" Cc: "Matthew" ; Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 3:38 PM Subject: Re: [SLE] SuSE Newbie: Why does SuSE use custom RPMs? Matt,
I was using Red Hat. I got turned off by the problems they introduced in 7.0 with their introduction of the not-yet-ready-for-prime-time glibc 2.2 package. I switched to SuSE when I saw how well the supported Oracle and I really like the docs supplied in the distro. Much better than RH. My
John Smiley writes: main
gripe is SuSE's seemingly non-standard way of packaging RPMs.
You mean there's a standard, or the way Redhat chooses to do it. The RPM package manager was never meant to be distribution generic.
John
----- Original Message ----- From: "Matthew"
To: "John Smiley" Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 3:18 PM Subject: Re: [SLE] SuSE Newbie: Why does SuSE use custom RPMs? Hello John,
2.4 is different from 2.2 with a captial D for different :-),
that out...
Not sure what other extras will be needed....Anyone from SuSE know
answer to this one?
You mentioned that you are new to SuSE? What were you using before, if I may ask?
Matt
On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, John Smiley wrote:
Matt,
I was hesitant about forcing the modutils install. I didn't know if it would break some of the "added extras" that SuSE provides. What are some of these extras? Would the inclusion of the raw I/O patch, lvm, and reiserfs in the SuSE 7.0 kernel be good examples? I can obtain all of these from their respective distribution sites. What other extras should I be aware of?
Thanks,
John
----- Original Message ----- From: "Matthew"
To: "John Smiley" Cc: Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 2:43 PM Subject: Re: [SLE] SuSE Newbie: Why does SuSE use custom RPMs? Hi John,
You may need to force the installation of Modutils, I got mine here: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/kernel/modutils/v2.4/
With the SuSE Kernels you get added extras that few others offer. And for otehr apps the ones you get with SuSE should have gone through a QA process too.
Matt
On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, John Smiley wrote:
> > ----- Original Message ----- > From: John Smiley > To: suse-linux-e@suse.com > Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 12:10 PM > Subject: SuSE Newbie: Why does SuSE use custom RPMs? > > > I am new to SuSE linux and have been having a hard time getting used to the use of "SuSE RPMs" as opposed to the usual RPMs I see posted everywhere on the web. For example, it's easy to find 'modutils-x.x.x.rpm' to update the latest version of modutils on most linux distributions, but SuSE uses 'modules.rpm'. And if I try to instal the modutils rpm from say, SourceForge, I get a message saying that it conflicts with files in SuSE's 'modules' package. > > Another example: SuSE uses lx-suse.rpm and lx-hack.rpm for
found the the
> > This is making it extremely hard for me to experiment. I would
> > Please help. I'm very impressed by the amount of support SuSE
"official" and "non-supported" versions of the kernel. Everyone else seems to simply use linux-2.x.x. It's especially hard to determine the version number of a SuSE RPM without querying it from rpm. The standard I see everywhere else is to include the version number in the rpm file name. like to try the new 2.4.x kernel, and I've seen the posts about downloading an rpm from ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mantel/next/ , but this is hardly main stream! I don't want to depend on someone else to put together a package that is compatible with SuSE. I want to download the kernel from ftp.kernel.org, read the Changes docs, download the appropriate versions of the required packages and compile my kernel. provides, especially where Oracle is concerned.
> > Regards, > > John R. Smiley >
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// // Name: Jesse Marlin // Intec Telecom Systems // // Voice: 404-705-2912 // 5775 Peachtree-Dunwoody Road, Bldg G // // Fax: 404-705-2805 // Atlanta, GA 30342 // // Email: jesse.marlin@intec-telecom-systems.com // // Web: http://www.intec-telecom-systems.com //
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq
-- Thorsten Kukuk http://www.suse.de/~kukuk/ kukuk@suse.de SuSE GmbH Schanzaeckerstr. 10 90443 Nuernberg Linux is like a Vorlon. It is incredibly powerful, gives terse, cryptic answers and has a lot of things going on in the background.
John Smiley wrote:
It isn't just RH that chooses this method. Every linux site that I've seen, other than SuSE, uses the same standard.
John
It's my understanding that the SuSE "ssh.rpm" or "proftpd.rpm" or whatever, is simply a link to the actual "ssh-2.3.x.rpm" or "proftpd-1.2.0.rpm". Someone from SuSE can confirm if this is true or if I'm just tooting out my backside... I also understand that this doesn't answer your question either ;^) I seem to recall being able to browse the SuSE ftp archive and see the actual rpm as well as the link. Can't seem to do that now, and I'm not sure why. As for the kernel sources, it's my understanding that you can most certainly use the kernel sources from kernel.org, you just don't get the extra mods and enhancements that SuSE provides. Ken -- Ken Hughes (kenh@ast-inc.com) | There are three ways to get Automated Systems of Tacoma, Inc. | something done: do it yourself, Information Technology | hire someone to do it, or forbid 253.475.0200(Voice) / 253.472.7164(Fax) | your kids to do it.
On Fri, Feb 09, Ken Hughes wrote:
John Smiley wrote:
It isn't just RH that chooses this method. Every linux site that I've seen, other than SuSE, uses the same standard.
John
It's my understanding that the SuSE "ssh.rpm" or "proftpd.rpm" or whatever, is simply a link to the actual "ssh-2.3.x.rpm" or "proftpd-1.2.0.rpm". Someone from SuSE can confirm if this is true or if I'm just tooting out my backside...
Look in the full-names directory on every CD, there are the full names like ssh-2.3.x-y.i386.rpm and so on. We have both. The same is true for our FTP server, look at ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/suse/i386/7.0/full-names for example. Even in the update area, the short RPM names are links to the full RPM name. Thorsten -- Thorsten Kukuk http://www.suse.de/~kukuk/ kukuk@suse.de SuSE GmbH Schanzaeckerstr. 10 90443 Nuernberg Linux is like a Vorlon. It is incredibly powerful, gives terse, cryptic answers and has a lot of things going on in the background.
John Smiley writes:
It isn't just RH that chooses this method. Every linux site that I've seen, other than SuSE, uses the same standard.
Debian, Slackware, are very big linux distributions that do not even use RPM. I cannot eloborate any further, because the only distributions I have ever used are Slackware, Redhat, and SuSE. Mandrake is a Redhat descendant, and you cannot reliably mix and match RPM's on these linuxes either. If you think you can you are mistaken. If I need an app that there is no RPM for or, if the RPM is out of date, I make my own.
John
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jesse Marlin"
To: "John Smiley" Cc: "Matthew" ; Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 3:38 PM Subject: Re: [SLE] SuSE Newbie: Why does SuSE use custom RPMs? Matt,
I was using Red Hat. I got turned off by the problems they introduced in 7.0 with their introduction of the not-yet-ready-for-prime-time glibc 2.2 package. I switched to SuSE when I saw how well the supported Oracle and I really like the docs supplied in the distro. Much better than RH. My
John Smiley writes: main
gripe is SuSE's seemingly non-standard way of packaging RPMs.
You mean there's a standard, or the way Redhat chooses to do it. The RPM package manager was never meant to be distribution generic.
John
----- Original Message ----- From: "Matthew"
To: "John Smiley" Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 3:18 PM Subject: Re: [SLE] SuSE Newbie: Why does SuSE use custom RPMs? Hello John,
2.4 is different from 2.2 with a captial D for different :-),
that out...
Not sure what other extras will be needed....Anyone from SuSE know
answer to this one?
You mentioned that you are new to SuSE? What were you using before, if I may ask?
Matt
On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, John Smiley wrote:
Matt,
I was hesitant about forcing the modutils install. I didn't know if it would break some of the "added extras" that SuSE provides. What are some of these extras? Would the inclusion of the raw I/O patch, lvm, and reiserfs in the SuSE 7.0 kernel be good examples? I can obtain all of these from their respective distribution sites. What other extras should I be aware of?
Thanks,
John
----- Original Message ----- From: "Matthew"
To: "John Smiley" Cc: Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 2:43 PM Subject: Re: [SLE] SuSE Newbie: Why does SuSE use custom RPMs? Hi John,
You may need to force the installation of Modutils, I got mine here: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/kernel/modutils/v2.4/
With the SuSE Kernels you get added extras that few others offer. And for otehr apps the ones you get with SuSE should have gone through a QA process too.
Matt
On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, John Smiley wrote:
> > ----- Original Message ----- > From: John Smiley > To: suse-linux-e@suse.com > Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 12:10 PM > Subject: SuSE Newbie: Why does SuSE use custom RPMs? > > > I am new to SuSE linux and have been having a hard time getting used to the use of "SuSE RPMs" as opposed to the usual RPMs I see posted everywhere on the web. For example, it's easy to find 'modutils-x.x.x.rpm' to update the latest version of modutils on most linux distributions, but SuSE uses 'modules.rpm'. And if I try to instal the modutils rpm from say, SourceForge, I get a message saying that it conflicts with files in SuSE's 'modules' package. > > Another example: SuSE uses lx-suse.rpm and lx-hack.rpm for
found the the
> > This is making it extremely hard for me to experiment. I would
> > Please help. I'm very impressed by the amount of support SuSE
"official" and "non-supported" versions of the kernel. Everyone else seems to simply use linux-2.x.x. It's especially hard to determine the version number of a SuSE RPM without querying it from rpm. The standard I see everywhere else is to include the version number in the rpm file name. like to try the new 2.4.x kernel, and I've seen the posts about downloading an rpm from ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mantel/next/ , but this is hardly main stream! I don't want to depend on someone else to put together a package that is compatible with SuSE. I want to download the kernel from ftp.kernel.org, read the Changes docs, download the appropriate versions of the required packages and compile my kernel. provides, especially where Oracle is concerned.
> > Regards, > > John R. Smiley >
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// // Name: Jesse Marlin // Intec Telecom Systems // // Voice: 404-705-2912 // 5775 Peachtree-Dunwoody Road, Bldg G // // Fax: 404-705-2805 // Atlanta, GA 30342 // // Email: jesse.marlin@intec-telecom-systems.com // // Web: http://www.intec-telecom-systems.com //
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// // Name: Jesse Marlin // Intec Telecom Systems // // Voice: 404-705-2912 // 5775 Peachtree-Dunwoody Road, Bldg G // // Fax: 404-705-2805 // Atlanta, GA 30342 // // Email: jesse.marlin@intec-telecom-systems.com // // Web: http://www.intec-telecom-systems.com //
John Smiley writes:
It isn't just RH that chooses this method. Every linux site that I've seen, other than SuSE, uses the same standard.
Debian, Slackware, are very big linux distributions that do not even use RPM. I cannot eloborate any further, because the only distributions I have ever used are Slackware, Redhat, and SuSE.
Mandrake is a Redhat descendant, and you cannot reliably mix and match RPM's on these linuxes either. If you think you can you are mistaken. If I need an app that there is no RPM for or, if the RPM is out of date, I make my own.
John
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jesse Marlin"
To: "John Smiley" Cc: "Matthew" ; Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 3:38 PM Subject: Re: [SLE] SuSE Newbie: Why does SuSE use custom RPMs? John Smiley writes:
Matt,
I was using Red Hat. I got turned off by the problems they
introduced
7.0 with their introduction of the not-yet-ready-for-prime-time glibc 2.2 package. I switched to SuSE when I saw how well the supported Oracle and I really like the docs supplied in the distro. Much better than RH. My
gripe is SuSE's seemingly non-standard way of packaging RPMs.
You mean there's a standard, or the way Redhat chooses to do it. The RPM package manager was never meant to be distribution generic.
John
----- Original Message ----- From: "Matthew"
To: "John Smiley" Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 3:18 PM Subject: Re: [SLE] SuSE Newbie: Why does SuSE use custom RPMs? Hello John,
2.4 is different from 2.2 with a captial D for different
:-), found
that out...
Not sure what other extras will be needed....Anyone from SuSE know
in main the
answer to this one?
You mentioned that you are new to SuSE? What were you using before, if I may ask?
Matt
On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, John Smiley wrote:
Matt,
I was hesitant about forcing the modutils install. I didn't know if it would break some of the "added extras" that SuSE provides. What are some of these extras? Would the inclusion of the raw I/O patch, lvm, and reiserfs in the SuSE 7.0 kernel be good examples? I can obtain all of
from
their respective distribution sites. What other extras should I be aware of?
Thanks,
John
----- Original Message ----- From: "Matthew"
To: "John Smiley" Cc: Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 2:43 PM Subject: Re: [SLE] SuSE Newbie: Why does SuSE use custom RPMs? > Hi John, > > You may need to force the installation of Modutils, I got mine here: > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/kernel/modutils/v2.4/ > > With the SuSE Kernels you get added extras that few others offer. And for > otehr apps the ones you get with SuSE should have gone
QA
> process too. > > Matt > > On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, John Smiley wrote: > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: John Smiley > > To: suse-linux-e@suse.com > > Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 12:10 PM > > Subject: SuSE Newbie: Why does SuSE use custom RPMs? > > > > > > I am new to SuSE linux and have been having a hard time getting used to the use of "SuSE RPMs" as opposed to the usual RPMs I see
everywhere on the web. For example, it's easy to find 'modutils-x.x.x.rpm' to update the latest version of modutils on most linux distributions, but SuSE uses 'modules.rpm'. And if I try to instal the modutils rpm from say, SourceForge, I get a message saying that it conflicts with files in SuSE's 'modules' package. > > > > Another example: SuSE uses lx-suse.rpm and lx-hack.rpm for the "official" and "non-supported" versions of the kernel. Everyone else seems to simply use linux-2.x.x. It's especially hard to determine
Bill Gates & Co. must laugh their collective a**es off whenever someone
suggests that Linux might one day take over the desktop. With every Linux
distro going its own way and with the continued battle-of-the-GUIs between
GNOME and KDE, Microsoft will never have anything to worry about.
On the other hand, HP, IBM, Sun, and Compaq (sorry to see you go DEC), had
better watch their backs. The 2.4 kernel is gaining ground in their
territory.
John R. Smiley
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jesse Marlin"
number of a SuSE RPM without querying it from rpm. The standard I see everywhere else is to include the version number in the rpm file name. > > > > This is making it extremely hard for me to experiment. I would
version like
to try the new 2.4.x kernel, and I've seen the posts about downloading an rpm from ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mantel/next/ , but this is hardly main stream! I don't want to depend on someone else to put together a package that is compatible with SuSE. I want to download the kernel from ftp.kernel.org, read the Changes docs, download the appropriate versions of the required packages and compile my kernel. > > > > Please help. I'm very impressed by the amount of support SuSE provides, especially where Oracle is concerned. > > > > Regards, > > > > John R. Smiley > > > >
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// // Name: Jesse Marlin // Intec Telecom Systems // // Voice: 404-705-2912 // 5775 Peachtree-Dunwoody Road, Bldg G // // Fax: 404-705-2805 // Atlanta, GA 30342 // // Email: jesse.marlin@intec-telecom-systems.com // // Web: http://www.intec-telecom-systems.com //
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// // Name: Jesse Marlin // Intec Telecom Systems // // Voice: 404-705-2912 // 5775 Peachtree-Dunwoody Road, Bldg G // // Fax: 404-705-2805 // Atlanta, GA 30342 // // Email: jesse.marlin@intec-telecom-systems.com // // Web: http://www.intec-telecom-systems.com //
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq
Check out www.lsb.org There will be more standards, not less...But there needs to be enough room to innovate. I use both KDE and GNOME, what "battle" are you referring to? This is all about choice, not battles for one single entity. Did you realise there is more than these two WM's out there? Just wanted to point this out.. Matt On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, John Smiley wrote:
Bill Gates & Co. must laugh their collective a**es off whenever someone suggests that Linux might one day take over the desktop. With every Linux distro going its own way and with the continued battle-of-the-GUIs between GNOME and KDE, Microsoft will never have anything to worry about.
On the other hand, HP, IBM, Sun, and Compaq (sorry to see you go DEC), had better watch their backs. The 2.4 kernel is gaining ground in their territory.
John R. Smiley
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jesse Marlin"
To: "John Smiley" Cc: Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 4:14 PM Subject: Re: [SLE] SuSE Newbie: Why does SuSE use custom RPMs? John Smiley writes:
It isn't just RH that chooses this method. Every linux site that I've seen, other than SuSE, uses the same standard.
Debian, Slackware, are very big linux distributions that do not even use RPM. I cannot eloborate any further, because the only distributions I have ever used are Slackware, Redhat, and SuSE.
Mandrake is a Redhat descendant, and you cannot reliably mix and match RPM's on these linuxes either. If you think you can you are mistaken. If I need an app that there is no RPM for or, if the RPM is out of date, I make my own.
John
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jesse Marlin"
To: "John Smiley" Cc: "Matthew" ; Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 3:38 PM Subject: Re: [SLE] SuSE Newbie: Why does SuSE use custom RPMs? John Smiley writes:
Matt,
I was using Red Hat. I got turned off by the problems they
7.0 with their introduction of the not-yet-ready-for-prime-time glibc 2.2 package. I switched to SuSE when I saw how well the supported Oracle and I really like the docs supplied in the distro. Much better than RH. My
gripe is SuSE's seemingly non-standard way of packaging RPMs.
You mean there's a standard, or the way Redhat chooses to do it. The RPM package manager was never meant to be distribution generic.
John
----- Original Message ----- From: "Matthew"
To: "John Smiley" Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 3:18 PM Subject: Re: [SLE] SuSE Newbie: Why does SuSE use custom RPMs? Hello John,
2.4 is different from 2.2 with a captial D for different
:-), found
that out...
Not sure what other extras will be needed....Anyone from SuSE know
in main the
answer to this one?
You mentioned that you are new to SuSE? What were you using before, if I may ask?
Matt
On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, John Smiley wrote:
> Matt, > > I was hesitant about forcing the modutils install. I didn't know if it > would break some of the "added extras" that SuSE provides. What are some of > these extras? Would the inclusion of the raw I/O patch, lvm, and reiserfs > in the SuSE 7.0 kernel be good examples? I can obtain all of
from
> their respective distribution sites. What other extras should I be aware > of? > > Thanks, > > John > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Matthew"
> To: "John Smiley" > Cc: > Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 2:43 PM > Subject: Re: [SLE] SuSE Newbie: Why does SuSE use custom RPMs? > > > > Hi John, > > > > You may need to force the installation of Modutils, I got mine here: > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/kernel/modutils/v2.4/ > > > > With the SuSE Kernels you get added extras that few others offer. And for > > otehr apps the ones you get with SuSE should have gone QA
> > process too. > > > > Matt > > > > On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, John Smiley wrote: > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: John Smiley > > > To: suse-linux-e@suse.com > > > Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 12:10 PM > > > Subject: SuSE Newbie: Why does SuSE use custom RPMs? > > > > > > > > > I am new to SuSE linux and have been having a hard time getting used > to the use of "SuSE RPMs" as opposed to the usual RPMs I see
> everywhere on the web. For example, it's easy to find 'modutils-x.x.x.rpm' > to update the latest version of modutils on most linux distributions, but > SuSE uses 'modules.rpm'. And if I try to instal the modutils rpm from say, > SourceForge, I get a message saying that it conflicts with files in SuSE's > 'modules' package. > > > > > > Another example: SuSE uses lx-suse.rpm and lx-hack.rpm for the > "official" and "non-supported" versions of the kernel. Everyone else seems > to simply use linux-2.x.x. It's especially hard to determine
introduced these through a posted the
> number of a SuSE RPM without querying it from rpm. The standard I see > everywhere else is to include the version number in the rpm file name. > > > > > > This is making it extremely hard for me to experiment. I would
version like
> to try the new 2.4.x kernel, and I've seen the posts about downloading an > rpm from ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mantel/next/ , but this is hardly > main stream! I don't want to depend on someone else to put together a > package that is compatible with SuSE. I want to download the kernel from > ftp.kernel.org, read the Changes docs, download the appropriate versions of > the required packages and compile my kernel. > > > > > > Please help. I'm very impressed by the amount of support SuSE > provides, especially where Oracle is concerned. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > John R. Smiley > > > > > > > > >
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// // Name: Jesse Marlin // Intec Telecom Systems // // Voice: 404-705-2912 // 5775 Peachtree-Dunwoody Road, Bldg G // // Fax: 404-705-2805 // Atlanta, GA 30342 // // Email: jesse.marlin@intec-telecom-systems.com // // Web: http://www.intec-telecom-systems.com //
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// // Name: Jesse Marlin // Intec Telecom Systems // // Voice: 404-705-2912 // 5775 Peachtree-Dunwoody Road, Bldg G // // Fax: 404-705-2805 // Atlanta, GA 30342 // // Email: jesse.marlin@intec-telecom-systems.com // // Web: http://www.intec-telecom-systems.com //
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq
John, When are you going to drop OutLook Express and use Linux tools? JLK On Friday 09 February 2001 15:36, John Smiley wrote:
Bill Gates & Co. must laugh their collective a**es off whenever someone suggests that Linux might one day take over the desktop. With every Linux distro going its own way and with the continued battle-of-the-GUIs between GNOME and KDE, Microsoft will never have anything to worry about.
On the other hand, HP, IBM, Sun, and Compaq (sorry to see you go DEC), had better watch their backs. The 2.4 kernel is gaining ground in their territory.
John R. Smiley
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jesse Marlin"
To: "John Smiley" Cc: Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 4:14 PM Subject: Re: [SLE] SuSE Newbie: Why does SuSE use custom RPMs? John Smiley writes:
It isn't just RH that chooses this method. Every linux site that I've
seen,
other than SuSE, uses the same standard.
Debian, Slackware, are very big linux distributions that do not even use RPM. I cannot eloborate any further, because the only distributions I have ever used are Slackware, Redhat, and SuSE.
Mandrake is a Redhat descendant, and you cannot reliably mix and match RPM's on these linuxes either. If you think you can you are mistaken. If I need an app that there is no RPM for or, if the RPM is out of date, I make my own.
John
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jesse Marlin"
To: "John Smiley" Cc: "Matthew" ; Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 3:38 PM Subject: Re: [SLE] SuSE Newbie: Why does SuSE use custom RPMs? John Smiley writes:
Matt,
I was using Red Hat. I got turned off by the problems they
introduced
in
7.0 with their introduction of the not-yet-ready-for-prime-time
glibc
2.2
package. I switched to SuSE when I saw how well the supported
Oracle
and I
really like the docs supplied in the distro. Much better than RH.
My
main
gripe is SuSE's seemingly non-standard way of packaging RPMs.
You mean there's a standard, or the way Redhat chooses to do it. The
RPM
package manager was never meant to be distribution generic.
John
----- Original Message ----- From: "Matthew"
To: "John Smiley" Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 3:18 PM Subject: Re: [SLE] SuSE Newbie: Why does SuSE use custom RPMs? Hello John,
2.4 is different from 2.2 with a captial D for different : :-), : found
that out...
Not sure what other extras will be needed....Anyone from SuSE
know
the
answer to this one?
You mentioned that you are new to SuSE? What were you using
before,
if I
may ask?
Matt
On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, John Smiley wrote: > Matt, > > I was hesitant about forcing the modutils install. I > didn't
know
if it
> would break some of the "added extras" that SuSE > provides.
What
are
some of
> these extras? Would the inclusion of the raw I/O > patch, lvm,
and
reiserfs
> in the SuSE 7.0 kernel be good examples? I can > obtain all of
these
from
> their respective distribution sites. What other > extras should
I be
aware
> of? > > Thanks, > > John > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Matthew"
> To: "John Smiley" > Cc: > Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 2:43 PM > Subject: Re: [SLE] SuSE Newbie: Why does SuSE use > custom RPMs? > > > Hi John, > > > > You may need to force the installation of > > Modutils, I got mine
here:
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/kernel/modutil > >s/v2.4/ > > > > With the SuSE Kernels you get added extras that few > > others
offer.
And
for
> > otehr apps the ones you get with SuSE should have > > gone
through a
QA
> > process too. > > > > Matt > > > > On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, John Smiley wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: John Smiley > > > To: suse-linux-e@suse.com > > > Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 12:10 PM > > > Subject: SuSE Newbie: Why does SuSE use custom > > > RPMs? > > > > > > > > > I am new to SuSE linux and have been having a > > > hard time
getting
used
> to the use of "SuSE RPMs" as opposed to the usual > RPMs I see
posted
> everywhere on the web. For example, it's easy to > find
'modutils-x.x.x.rpm'
> to update the latest version of modutils on most > linux
distributions,
but
> SuSE uses 'modules.rpm'. And if I try to instal the > modutils
rpm
from
say,
> SourceForge, I get a message saying that it conflicts > with
files in
SuSE's
> 'modules' package. > > > > Another example: SuSE uses lx-suse.rpm and > > > lx-hack.rpm
for
the
> "official" and "non-supported" versions of the > kernel.
Everyone
else
seems
> to simply use linux-2.x.x. It's especially hard to > determine
the
version
> number of a SuSE RPM without querying it from rpm. > The
standard I
see
> everywhere else is to include the version number in > the rpm
file
name.
> > > This is making it extremely hard for me to > > > experiment.
I
would
like
> to try the new 2.4.x kernel, and I've seen the posts > about
downloading
an
> rpm from ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mantel/next/ , > but this
is
hardly
> main stream! I don't want to depend on someone else > to put
together a
> package that is compatible with SuSE. I want to > download the
kernel
from
> ftp.kernel.org, read the Changes docs, download the
appropriate
versions
of
> the required packages and compile my kernel. > > > > Please help. I'm very impressed by the amount > > > of
support
SuSE
> provides, especially where Oracle is concerned. > > > > Regards, > > > > > > John R. Smiley
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ///////// // Name: Jesse Marlin // Intec Telecom Systems // // Voice: 404-705-2912 // 5775 Peachtree-Dunwoody Road, Bldg G // // Fax: 404-705-2805 // Atlanta, GA 30342 // // Email: jesse.marlin@intec-telecom-systems.com // // Web: http://www.intec-telecom-systems.com //
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// //// // Name: Jesse Marlin // Intec Telecom Systems // // Voice: 404-705-2912 // 5775 Peachtree-Dunwoody Road, Bldg G // // Fax: 404-705-2805 // Atlanta, GA 30342 // // Email: jesse.marlin@intec-telecom-systems.com // // Web: http://www.intec-telecom-systems.com //
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq
-- "God who gave us life gave us liberty. And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of people that these liberties are a gift of God? Thomas Jefferson - 1781
had a friend who used Mandrake, really messing when it came to installaing software... Matt On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, Jesse Marlin wrote:
John Smiley writes:
It isn't just RH that chooses this method. Every linux site that I've seen, other than SuSE, uses the same standard.
Debian, Slackware, are very big linux distributions that do not even use RPM. I cannot eloborate any further, because the only distributions I have ever used are Slackware, Redhat, and SuSE.
Mandrake is a Redhat descendant, and you cannot reliably mix and match RPM's on these linuxes either. If you think you can you are mistaken. If I need an app that there is no RPM for or, if the RPM is out of date, I make my own.
John
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jesse Marlin"
To: "John Smiley" Cc: "Matthew" ; Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 3:38 PM Subject: Re: [SLE] SuSE Newbie: Why does SuSE use custom RPMs? Matt,
I was using Red Hat. I got turned off by the problems they introduced in 7.0 with their introduction of the not-yet-ready-for-prime-time glibc 2.2 package. I switched to SuSE when I saw how well the supported Oracle and I really like the docs supplied in the distro. Much better than RH. My
John Smiley writes: main
gripe is SuSE's seemingly non-standard way of packaging RPMs.
You mean there's a standard, or the way Redhat chooses to do it. The RPM package manager was never meant to be distribution generic.
John
----- Original Message ----- From: "Matthew"
To: "John Smiley" Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 3:18 PM Subject: Re: [SLE] SuSE Newbie: Why does SuSE use custom RPMs? Hello John,
2.4 is different from 2.2 with a captial D for different :-),
that out...
Not sure what other extras will be needed....Anyone from SuSE know
answer to this one?
You mentioned that you are new to SuSE? What were you using before, if I may ask?
Matt
On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, John Smiley wrote:
Matt,
I was hesitant about forcing the modutils install. I didn't know if it would break some of the "added extras" that SuSE provides. What are some of these extras? Would the inclusion of the raw I/O patch, lvm, and reiserfs in the SuSE 7.0 kernel be good examples? I can obtain all of these from their respective distribution sites. What other extras should I be aware of?
Thanks,
John
----- Original Message ----- From: "Matthew"
To: "John Smiley" Cc: Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 2:43 PM Subject: Re: [SLE] SuSE Newbie: Why does SuSE use custom RPMs? > Hi John, > > You may need to force the installation of Modutils, I got mine here: > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/kernel/modutils/v2.4/ > > With the SuSE Kernels you get added extras that few others offer. And for > otehr apps the ones you get with SuSE should have gone through a QA > process too. > > Matt > > On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, John Smiley wrote: > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: John Smiley > > To: suse-linux-e@suse.com > > Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 12:10 PM > > Subject: SuSE Newbie: Why does SuSE use custom RPMs? > > > > > > I am new to SuSE linux and have been having a hard time getting used to the use of "SuSE RPMs" as opposed to the usual RPMs I see posted everywhere on the web. For example, it's easy to find 'modutils-x.x.x.rpm' to update the latest version of modutils on most linux distributions, but SuSE uses 'modules.rpm'. And if I try to instal the modutils rpm from say, SourceForge, I get a message saying that it conflicts with files in SuSE's 'modules' package. > > > > Another example: SuSE uses lx-suse.rpm and lx-hack.rpm for
found the the
"official" and "non-supported" versions of the kernel. Everyone else seems to simply use linux-2.x.x. It's especially hard to determine the version number of a SuSE RPM without querying it from rpm. The standard I see everywhere else is to include the version number in the rpm file name. > > > > This is making it extremely hard for me to experiment. I would like to try the new 2.4.x kernel, and I've seen the posts about downloading an rpm from ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mantel/next/ , but this is hardly main stream! I don't want to depend on someone else to put together a package that is compatible with SuSE. I want to download the kernel from ftp.kernel.org, read the Changes docs, download the appropriate versions of the required packages and compile my kernel. > > > > Please help. I'm very impressed by the amount of support SuSE provides, especially where Oracle is concerned. > > > > Regards, > > > > John R. Smiley > > > >
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// // Name: Jesse Marlin // Intec Telecom Systems // // Voice: 404-705-2912 // 5775 Peachtree-Dunwoody Road, Bldg G // // Fax: 404-705-2805 // Atlanta, GA 30342 // // Email: jesse.marlin@intec-telecom-systems.com // // Web: http://www.intec-telecom-systems.com //
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// // Name: Jesse Marlin // Intec Telecom Systems // // Voice: 404-705-2912 // 5775 Peachtree-Dunwoody Road, Bldg G // // Fax: 404-705-2805 // Atlanta, GA 30342 // // Email: jesse.marlin@intec-telecom-systems.com // // Web: http://www.intec-telecom-systems.com //
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq
On Friday 09 February 2001 15:14, Jesse Marlin wrote:
John Smiley writes:
It isn't just RH that chooses this method. Every linux site that I've seen, other than SuSE, uses the same standard.
Debian, Slackware, are very big linux distributions that do not even use RPM. I cannot eloborate any further, because the only distributions I have ever used are Slackware, Redhat, and SuSE.
Mandrake is a Redhat descendant, and you cannot reliably mix and match RPM's on these linuxes either. If you think you can you are mistaken. If I need an app that there is no RPM for or, if the RPM is out of date, I make my own.
John
Which is one reason why I use tarballs to install apps that SuSE doesn't supply on their CDs or FTP site.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jesse Marlin"
To: "John Smiley" Cc: "Matthew" ; Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 3:38 PM Subject: Re: [SLE] SuSE Newbie: Why does SuSE use custom RPMs? John Smiley writes:
Matt,
I was using Red Hat. I got turned off by the problems they introduced
in
7.0 with their introduction of the not-yet-ready-for-prime-time glibc
2.2
package. I switched to SuSE when I saw how well the supported Oracle
and I
really like the docs supplied in the distro. Much better than RH. My
main
gripe is SuSE's seemingly non-standard way of packaging RPMs.
You mean there's a standard, or the way Redhat chooses to do it. The RPM package manager was never meant to be distribution generic.
John
----- Original Message ----- From: "Matthew"
To: "John Smiley" Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 3:18 PM Subject: Re: [SLE] SuSE Newbie: Why does SuSE use custom RPMs? Hello John,
2.4 is different from 2.2 with a captial D for different :-),
found
that out...
Not sure what other extras will be needed....Anyone from SuSE know
the
answer to this one?
You mentioned that you are new to SuSE? What were you using before,
if I
may ask?
Matt
On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, John Smiley wrote:
Matt,
I was hesitant about forcing the modutils install. I didn't know
if it
would break some of the "added extras" that SuSE provides. What
are
some of
these extras? Would the inclusion of the raw I/O patch, lvm, and
reiserfs
in the SuSE 7.0 kernel be good examples? I can obtain all of these
from
their respective distribution sites. What other extras should I be
aware
of?
Thanks,
John
----- Original Message ----- From: "Matthew"
To: "John Smiley" Cc: Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 2:43 PM Subject: Re: [SLE] SuSE Newbie: Why does SuSE use custom RPMs? > Hi John, > > You may need to force the installation of > Modutils, I got mine
here:
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/kernel/modutils/ >v2.4/ > > With the SuSE Kernels you get added extras that few > others offer.
And
for
> otehr apps the ones you get with SuSE should have > gone through a
QA
> process too. > > Matt > > On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, John Smiley wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: John Smiley > > To: suse-linux-e@suse.com > > Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 12:10 PM > > Subject: SuSE Newbie: Why does SuSE use custom > > RPMs? > > > > > > I am new to SuSE linux and have been having a > > hard time
getting
used
to the use of "SuSE RPMs" as opposed to the usual RPMs I see posted everywhere on the web. For example, it's easy to find
'modutils-x.x.x.rpm'
to update the latest version of modutils on most linux
distributions,
but
SuSE uses 'modules.rpm'. And if I try to instal the modutils rpm
from
say,
SourceForge, I get a message saying that it conflicts with files in
SuSE's
'modules' package.
> > Another example: SuSE uses lx-suse.rpm and > > lx-hack.rpm for
the
"official" and "non-supported" versions of the kernel. Everyone
else
seems
to simply use linux-2.x.x. It's especially hard to determine the
version
number of a SuSE RPM without querying it from rpm. The standard I
see
everywhere else is to include the version number in the rpm file
name.
> > This is making it extremely hard for me to > > experiment. I
would
like
to try the new 2.4.x kernel, and I've seen the posts about
downloading
an
rpm from ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mantel/next/ , but this is
hardly
main stream! I don't want to depend on someone else to put
together a
package that is compatible with SuSE. I want to download the
kernel
from
ftp.kernel.org, read the Changes docs, download the appropriate
versions
of
the required packages and compile my kernel.
> > Please help. I'm very impressed by the amount of > > support
SuSE
provides, especially where Oracle is concerned.
> > Regards, > > > > John R. Smiley
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// /////// // Name: Jesse Marlin // Intec Telecom Systems // // Voice: 404-705-2912 // 5775 Peachtree-Dunwoody Road, Bldg G // // Fax: 404-705-2805 // Atlanta, GA 30342 // // Email: jesse.marlin@intec-telecom-systems.com // // Web: http://www.intec-telecom-systems.com //
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// // // Name: Jesse Marlin // Intec Telecom Systems // // Voice: 404-705-2912 // 5775 Peachtree-Dunwoody Road, Bldg G // // Fax: 404-705-2805 // Atlanta, GA 30342 // // Email: jesse.marlin@intec-telecom-systems.com // // Web: http://www.intec-telecom-systems.com //
-- "God who gave us life gave us liberty. And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of people that these liberties are a gift of God? Thomas Jefferson - 1781
John, Your best option (seriously) to get the 2.4 kernel, is either get it from Mantel (its under the next directory, might as well get the 2.4.1 version) and just go for it. Force the install as modutils is totally different under 2.4, there physicially in a different directory. If that is too much for you then you would have been better off waiting for SuSE 7.1 (which gives you the option for 2.4). Again, if you are certain that rpm-i386.rpm is too risky then try and find a rpm-src-i386.rpm. Or find the *.tar.gz. Getting warnings due to earlier versions is normal.... Matt On Friday 09 February 2001 06:46 pm, Jerry Kreps wrote:
On Friday 09 February 2001 15:14, Jesse Marlin wrote:
John Smiley writes:
It isn't just RH that chooses this method. Every linux site that I've seen, other than SuSE, uses the same standard.
Debian, Slackware, are very big linux distributions that do not even use RPM. I cannot eloborate any further, because the only distributions I have ever used are Slackware, Redhat, and SuSE.
Mandrake is a Redhat descendant, and you cannot reliably mix and match RPM's on these linuxes either. If you think you can you are mistaken. If I need an app that there is no RPM for or, if the RPM is out of date, I make my own.
John
Which is one reason why I use tarballs to install apps that SuSE doesn't supply on their CDs or FTP site.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jesse Marlin"
To: "John Smiley" Cc: "Matthew" ; Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 3:38 PM Subject: Re: [SLE] SuSE Newbie: Why does SuSE use custom RPMs? John Smiley writes:
Matt,
I was using Red Hat. I got turned off by the problems they introduced
in
7.0 with their introduction of the not-yet-ready-for-prime-time glibc
2.2
package. I switched to SuSE when I saw how well the supported Oracle
and I
really like the docs supplied in the distro. Much better than RH. My
main
gripe is SuSE's seemingly non-standard way of packaging RPMs.
You mean there's a standard, or the way Redhat chooses to do it. The RPM package manager was never meant to be distribution generic.
John
----- Original Message ----- From: "Matthew"
To: "John Smiley" Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 3:18 PM Subject: Re: [SLE] SuSE Newbie: Why does SuSE use custom RPMs? Hello John,
2.4 is different from 2.2 with a captial D for different :-),
found
that out...
Not sure what other extras will be needed....Anyone from SuSE know
the
answer to this one?
You mentioned that you are new to SuSE? What were you using before,
if I
may ask?
Matt
On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, John Smiley wrote: > Matt, > > I was hesitant about forcing the modutils install. I > didn't know
if it
> would break some of the "added extras" that SuSE > provides. What
are
some of
> these extras? Would the inclusion of the raw I/O > patch, lvm, and
reiserfs
> in the SuSE 7.0 kernel be good examples? I can obtain > all of these
from
> their respective distribution sites. What other extras > should I be
aware
> of? > > Thanks, > > John > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Matthew"
> To: "John Smiley" > Cc: > Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 2:43 PM > Subject: Re: [SLE] SuSE Newbie: Why does SuSE use > custom RPMs? > > > Hi John, > > > > You may need to force the installation of > > Modutils, I got mine here:
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/kernel/modutils/ > >v2.4/ > > > > With the SuSE Kernels you get added extras that few > > others offer.
And
for
> > otehr apps the ones you get with SuSE should have > > gone through a
QA
> > process too. > > > > Matt > > > > On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, John Smiley wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: John Smiley > > > To: suse-linux-e@suse.com > > > Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 12:10 PM > > > Subject: SuSE Newbie: Why does SuSE use custom > > > RPMs? > > > > > > > > > I am new to SuSE linux and have been having a > > > hard time
getting
used
> to the use of "SuSE RPMs" as opposed to the usual RPMs > I see posted everywhere on the web. For example, it's > easy to find
'modutils-x.x.x.rpm'
> to update the latest version of modutils on most linux
distributions,
but
> SuSE uses 'modules.rpm'. And if I try to instal the > modutils rpm
from
say,
> SourceForge, I get a message saying that it conflicts > with files in
SuSE's
> 'modules' package. > > > > Another example: SuSE uses lx-suse.rpm and > > > lx-hack.rpm for
the
> "official" and "non-supported" versions of the kernel. > Everyone
else
seems
> to simply use linux-2.x.x. It's especially hard to > determine the
version
> number of a SuSE RPM without querying it from rpm. The > standard I
see
> everywhere else is to include the version number in the > rpm file
name.
> > > This is making it extremely hard for me to > > > experiment. I
would
like
> to try the new 2.4.x kernel, and I've seen the posts > about
downloading
an
> rpm from ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mantel/next/ , > but this is
hardly
> main stream! I don't want to depend on someone else to > put
together a
> package that is compatible with SuSE. I want to > download the
kernel
from
> ftp.kernel.org, read the Changes docs, download the > appropriate
versions
of
> the required packages and compile my kernel. > > > > Please help. I'm very impressed by the amount of > > > support
SuSE
> provides, especially where Oracle is concerned. > > > > Regards, > > > > > > John R. Smiley
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// /////// // Name: Jesse Marlin // Intec Telecom Systems // // Voice: 404-705-2912 // 5775 Peachtree-Dunwoody Road, Bldg G // // Fax: 404-705-2805 // Atlanta, GA 30342 // // Email: jesse.marlin@intec-telecom-systems.com // // Web: http://www.intec-telecom-systems.com //
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// // // Name: Jesse Marlin // Intec Telecom Systems // // Voice: 404-705-2912 // 5775 Peachtree-Dunwoody Road, Bldg G // // Fax: 404-705-2805 // Atlanta, GA 30342 // // Email: jesse.marlin@intec-telecom-systems.com // // Web: http://www.intec-telecom-systems.com //
Once caveat about 2.4.x..... If you have to use OSS sound (4Front technologies) like I do, you may not be able to get your sound card running. The last I heard they hadn't fixed the bugs the prevent their driver from working on old Yamaha chips using SuSE and 2.4 JLK On Friday 09 February 2001 20:56, Matthew wrote:
John,
Your best option (seriously) to get the 2.4 kernel, is either get it from Mantel (its under the next directory, might as well get the 2.4.1 version) and just go for it. Force the install as modutils is totally different under 2.4, there physicially in a different directory.
If that is too much for you then you would have been better off waiting for SuSE 7.1 (which gives you the option for 2.4).
Again, if you are certain that rpm-i386.rpm is too risky then try and find a rpm-src-i386.rpm. Or find the *.tar.gz.
Getting warnings due to earlier versions is normal....
Matt
On Friday 09 February 2001 06:46 pm, Jerry Kreps wrote:
On Friday 09 February 2001 15:14, Jesse Marlin wrote:
John Smiley writes:
It isn't just RH that chooses this method. Every linux site that I've seen, other than SuSE, uses the same standard.
Debian, Slackware, are very big linux distributions that do not even use RPM. I cannot eloborate any further, because the only distributions I have ever used are Slackware, Redhat, and SuSE.
Mandrake is a Redhat descendant, and you cannot reliably mix and match RPM's on these linuxes either. If you think you can you are mistaken. If I need an app that there is no RPM for or, if the RPM is out of date, I make my own.
John
Which is one reason why I use tarballs to install apps that SuSE doesn't supply on their CDs or FTP site.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jesse Marlin"
To: "John Smiley" Cc: "Matthew" ; Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 3:38 PM Subject: Re: [SLE] SuSE Newbie: Why does SuSE use custom RPMs? John Smiley writes:
Matt,
I was using Red Hat. I got turned off by the problems they introduced
in
7.0 with their introduction of the not-yet-ready-for-prime-time glibc
2.2
package. I switched to SuSE when I saw how well the supported Oracle
and I
really like the docs supplied in the distro. Much better than RH. My
main
gripe is SuSE's seemingly non-standard way of packaging RPMs.
You mean there's a standard, or the way Redhat chooses to do it. The RPM package manager was never meant to be distribution generic.
John
----- Original Message ----- From: "Matthew"
To: "John Smiley" Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 3:18 PM Subject: Re: [SLE] SuSE Newbie: Why does SuSE use custom RPMs? > Hello John, > > 2.4 is different from 2.2 with a captial D for > different :-),
found
> that out... > > Not sure what other extras will be needed....Anyone > from SuSE know
the
> answer to this one? > > You mentioned that you are new to SuSE? What were you > using before,
if I
> may ask? > > Matt > > On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, John Smiley wrote: > > Matt, > > > > I was hesitant about forcing the modutils install. > > I didn't know
if it
> > would break some of the "added extras" that SuSE > > provides. What
are
some of
> > these extras? Would the inclusion of the raw I/O > > patch, lvm, and
reiserfs
> > in the SuSE 7.0 kernel be good examples? I can > > obtain all of these
from
> > their respective distribution sites. What other > > extras should I be
aware
> > of? > > > > Thanks, > > > > John > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Matthew"
> > To: "John Smiley" > > Cc: > > Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 2:43 PM > > Subject: Re: [SLE] SuSE Newbie: Why does SuSE use > > custom RPMs? > > > > > Hi John, > > > > > > You may need to force the installation of > > > Modutils, I got mine here: > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/kernel/modut > > >ils/ v2.4/ > > > > > > With the SuSE Kernels you get added extras that > > > few others offer.
And
for
> > > otehr apps the ones you get with SuSE should have > > > gone through a
QA
> > > process too. > > > > > > Matt > > > > > > On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, John Smiley wrote: > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: John Smiley > > > > To: suse-linux-e@suse.com > > > > Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 12:10 PM > > > > Subject: SuSE Newbie: Why does SuSE use > > > > custom RPMs? > > > > > > > > > > > > I am new to SuSE linux and have been having a > > > > hard time
getting
used
> > to the use of "SuSE RPMs" as opposed to the usual > > RPMs I see posted everywhere on the web. For > > example, it's easy to find
'modutils-x.x.x.rpm'
> > to update the latest version of modutils on most > > linux
distributions,
but
> > SuSE uses 'modules.rpm'. And if I try to instal > > the modutils rpm
from
say,
> > SourceForge, I get a message saying that it > > conflicts with files in
SuSE's
> > 'modules' package. > > > > > > Another example: SuSE uses lx-suse.rpm and > > > > lx-hack.rpm for
the
> > "official" and "non-supported" versions of the > > kernel. Everyone
else
seems
> > to simply use linux-2.x.x. It's especially hard to > > determine the
version
> > number of a SuSE RPM without querying it from rpm. > > The standard I
see
> > everywhere else is to include the version number in > > the rpm file
name.
> > > > This is making it extremely hard for me to > > > > experiment. I
would
like
> > to try the new 2.4.x kernel, and I've seen the > > posts about
downloading
an
> > rpm from ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mantel/next/ > > , but this is
hardly
> > main stream! I don't want to depend on someone > > else to put
together a
> > package that is compatible with SuSE. I want to > > download the
kernel
from
> > ftp.kernel.org, read the Changes docs, download the > > appropriate
versions
of
> > the required packages and compile my kernel. > > > > > > Please help. I'm very impressed by the > > > > amount of support
SuSE
> > provides, especially where Oracle is concerned. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > John R. Smiley
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// //// /////// // Name: Jesse Marlin // Intec Telecom Systems // // Voice: 404-705-2912 // 5775 Peachtree-Dunwoody Road, Bldg G // // Fax: 404-705-2805 // Atlanta, GA 30342 // // Email: jesse.marlin@intec-telecom-systems.com // // Web: http://www.intec-telecom-systems.com //
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// //// // // Name: Jesse Marlin // Intec Telecom Systems // // Voice: 404-705-2912 // 5775 Peachtree-Dunwoody Road, Bldg G // // Fax: 404-705-2805 // Atlanta, GA 30342 // // Email: jesse.marlin@intec-telecom-systems.com // // Web: http://www.intec-telecom-systems.com //
-- "God who gave us life gave us liberty. And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of people that these liberties are a gift of God? Thomas Jefferson - 1781
Had to think for awhile about that RPM issue, there are a few differences between the systems I believe (and am I right in thinking that RH has changed there RPM to a brand new version?). I think the main differences will be slight differences in the libraries (depending on the package), but the biggest one will be the actual location of the place that the software will go. RH is non-standard (SuSE is based on Slackware, which in turn based itself off of the main Unix standards) and SuSE is the one nearest to the LSB dynamic standard. Any differences between the RPM's may well have been introduced with RH 7.0 as they introduced a much newer RPM package manager... I wish they would name there rpms better than just modutils.rpm...Although with Yast you can pull up the version details. Hope that answers it all, Matt (would be great if SuSE would use that tool, or support that tool that allows you to use Debian package manager...) On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, John Smiley wrote:
Matt,
I was using Red Hat. I got turned off by the problems they introduced in 7.0 with their introduction of the not-yet-ready-for-prime-time glibc 2.2 package. I switched to SuSE when I saw how well the supported Oracle and I really like the docs supplied in the distro. Much better than RH. My main gripe is SuSE's seemingly non-standard way of packaging RPMs.
John
----- Original Message ----- From: "Matthew"
To: "John Smiley" Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 3:18 PM Subject: Re: [SLE] SuSE Newbie: Why does SuSE use custom RPMs? Hello John,
2.4 is different from 2.2 with a captial D for different :-), found that out...
Not sure what other extras will be needed....Anyone from SuSE know the answer to this one?
You mentioned that you are new to SuSE? What were you using before, if I may ask?
Matt
On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, John Smiley wrote:
Matt,
I was hesitant about forcing the modutils install. I didn't know if it would break some of the "added extras" that SuSE provides. What are some of these extras? Would the inclusion of the raw I/O patch, lvm, and reiserfs in the SuSE 7.0 kernel be good examples? I can obtain all of these from their respective distribution sites. What other extras should I be aware of?
Thanks,
John
----- Original Message ----- From: "Matthew"
To: "John Smiley" Cc: Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 2:43 PM Subject: Re: [SLE] SuSE Newbie: Why does SuSE use custom RPMs? Hi John,
You may need to force the installation of Modutils, I got mine here: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/kernel/modutils/v2.4/
With the SuSE Kernels you get added extras that few others offer. And for otehr apps the ones you get with SuSE should have gone through a QA process too.
Matt
On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, John Smiley wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: John Smiley To: suse-linux-e@suse.com Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 12:10 PM Subject: SuSE Newbie: Why does SuSE use custom RPMs?
I am new to SuSE linux and have been having a hard time getting
used to the use of "SuSE RPMs" as opposed to the usual RPMs I see posted everywhere on the web. For example, it's easy to find 'modutils-x.x.x.rpm' to update the latest version of modutils on most linux distributions, but SuSE uses 'modules.rpm'. And if I try to instal the modutils rpm from say, SourceForge, I get a message saying that it conflicts with files in SuSE's 'modules' package.
Another example: SuSE uses lx-suse.rpm and lx-hack.rpm for the
"official" and "non-supported" versions of the kernel. Everyone else seems to simply use linux-2.x.x. It's especially hard to determine the version number of a SuSE RPM without querying it from rpm. The standard I see everywhere else is to include the version number in the rpm file name.
This is making it extremely hard for me to experiment. I would
like to try the new 2.4.x kernel, and I've seen the posts about downloading an rpm from ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mantel/next/ , but this is hardly main stream! I don't want to depend on someone else to put together a package that is compatible with SuSE. I want to download the kernel from ftp.kernel.org, read the Changes docs, download the appropriate versions of the required packages and compile my kernel.
Please help. I'm very impressed by the amount of support SuSE
provides, especially where Oracle is concerned.
Regards,
John R. Smiley
On Fri, Feb 09, Matthew wrote:
I wish they would name there rpms better than just modutils.rpm...Although with Yast you can pull up the version details.
We have both, the full, long names and the short one on every CD and on the ftp server. I really don't understand your problem with it. Thorsten -- Thorsten Kukuk http://www.suse.de/~kukuk/ kukuk@suse.de SuSE GmbH Schanzaeckerstr. 10 90443 Nuernberg Linux is like a Vorlon. It is incredibly powerful, gives terse, cryptic answers and has a lot of things going on in the background.
participants (6)
-
Jerry Kreps
-
Jesse Marlin
-
John Smiley
-
Ken Hughes
-
Matthew
-
Thorsten Kukuk