Hi! Did anyone successfully configured the Alice package for the SuSE 7.1? I followed step to step the documentation in /usr/share/doc/packages/alice/alice.pdf But at point 3.5.1, when I try to create the boot floppy, I have an error. (info file for this machine not found). Any clue? -- Christophe Greisberger Zenon-Media GmbH Phone: +49 (7852) 9133 / 34 Fax : +49 (7852) 9133 / 35
Greisberger Christophe wrote:
Hi!
Did anyone successfully configured the Alice package for the SuSE 7.1?
I followed step to step the documentation in /usr/share/doc/packages/alice/alice.pdf
But at point 3.5.1, when I try to create the boot floppy, I have an error.
(info file for this machine not found).
Jay (in the cc) just did it for Oracle (they're using suse now). Jay, could you summarize to the list the diff to the alice.pdf doc that you did to get it going - if any?
Hi, now and then I'm getting odd "Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender" messages that have something to do with this list. Sample piece attached below. This morning I got 7 of them, all from the same source. Am I doing something wrong with my mail program (Netscape on Win$/Kmail on Linux), or what's going on here? I normally use Reply All and edit the recipient address into only To:suse-linux-e@suse.com TIA, Gudmund Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 03:21:44 -0400 (EDT) From: MAILER-DAEMON@one-socialist-africa.org (Mail Delivery System) To: fta@algonet.se This is the Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.1 (i386) program at host station1.one-socialist-africa.org. I'm sorry to have to inform you that the message returned below could not be delivered to one or more destinations. For further assistance, please send mail to <postmaster> If you do so, please include this problem report. You can delete your own text from the message returned below. The Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.1 (i386) program <sfbarbee@localhost.one-socialist-africa.org>: Name service error for domain localhost.one-socialist-africa.org: Host not found Reporting-MTA: dns; station1.one-socialist-africa.org Arrival-Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 09:15:11 -0400 (EDT) Final-Recipient: rfc822; sfbarbee@localhost.one-socialist-africa.org Action: failed Status: 5.0.0 Diagnostic-Code: X-Postfix; Name service error for domain localhost.one-socialist-africa.org: Host not found Subject: Re: [SLE] Updating with Yast2 vs Yast1 Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2001 20:01:00 +0200 From: Gudmund Areskoug <fta@algonet.se> Organization: Free Trade Associates To: SuSE listserve <suse-linux-e@suse.com> References: 1
This morning I got the same: (two of them...) Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 03:19:13 -0400 (EDT) From: MAILER-DAEMON@one-socialist-africa.org (Mail Delivery System) To: jonclausen@get2net.dk This is the Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.1 (i386) program at host station1.one-socialist-africa.org. I'm sorry to have to inform you that the message returned below could not be delivered to one or more destinations. For further assistance, please send mail to <postmaster> If you do so, please include this problem report. You can delete your own text from the message returned below. The Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.1 (i386) program <sfbarbee@localhost.one-socialist-africa.org>: Name service error for domain localhost.one-socialist-africa.org: Host not found The weird thing is that the message *was* delivered (to suse-linux-e@suse.com) and shows up on the list...? What's going on? Is this some kind of socialist conspiracy? ;-) On Thursday 05 April 2001 10:00, you wrote:
Hi,
now and then I'm getting odd "Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender" messages that have something to do with this list. Sample piece attached below. This morning I got 7 of them, all from the same source.
Am I doing something wrong with my mail program (Netscape on Win$/Kmail on Linux), or what's going on here?
I normally use Reply All and edit the recipient address into only To:suse-linux-e@suse.com
TIA, Gudmund
Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 03:21:44 -0400 (EDT) From: MAILER-DAEMON@one-socialist-africa.org (Mail Delivery System) To: fta@algonet.se
This is the Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.1 (i386) program at host station1.one-socialist-africa.org.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that the message returned below could not be delivered to one or more destinations.
For further assistance, please send mail to <postmaster>
If you do so, please include this problem report. You can delete your own text from the message returned below.
The Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.1 (i386) program
<sfbarbee@localhost.one-socialist-africa.org>: Name service error for domain localhost.one-socialist-africa.org: Host not found
Reporting-MTA: dns; station1.one-socialist-africa.org Arrival-Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 09:15:11 -0400 (EDT)
Final-Recipient: rfc822; sfbarbee@localhost.one-socialist-africa.org Action: failed Status: 5.0.0 Diagnostic-Code: X-Postfix; Name service error for domain localhost.one-socialist-africa.org: Host not found
Subject: Re: [SLE] Updating with Yast2 vs Yast1 Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2001 20:01:00 +0200 From: Gudmund Areskoug <fta@algonet.se> Organization: Free Trade Associates To: SuSE listserve <suse-linux-e@suse.com> References: 1
had 2 myself, maybe someone has set a SuSe Server up on the net and got it not quite right first time, then fixed problem (which is why you can't mail them back) rather than a spammer / intruder. my 2 bits / hoping scsijon ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jon Clausen" <jonclausen@get2net.dk> To: <suse-linux-e@suse.com> Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 6:11 PM Subject: Re: [SLE] Strange list-related messages
This morning I got the same: (two of them...)
Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 03:19:13 -0400 (EDT) From: MAILER-DAEMON@one-socialist-africa.org (Mail Delivery System) To: jonclausen@get2net.dk
This is the Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.1 (i386) program at host station1.one-socialist-africa.org.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that the message returned below could not be delivered to one or more destinations.
For further assistance, please send mail to <postmaster>
If you do so, please include this problem report. You can delete your own text from the message returned below.
The Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.1 (i386) program
<sfbarbee@localhost.one-socialist-africa.org>: Name service error for domain localhost.one-socialist-africa.org: Host not found
The weird thing is that the message *was* delivered (to suse-linux-e@suse.com) and shows up on the list...?
What's going on?
Is this some kind of socialist conspiracy? ;-)
On Thursday 05 April 2001 10:00, you wrote:
Hi,
now and then I'm getting odd "Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender" messages that have something to do with this list. Sample piece attached below. This morning I got 7 of them, all from the same source.
Am I doing something wrong with my mail program (Netscape on Win$/Kmail on Linux), or what's going on here?
I normally use Reply All and edit the recipient address into only To:suse-linux-e@suse.com
TIA, Gudmund
Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 03:21:44 -0400 (EDT) From: MAILER-DAEMON@one-socialist-africa.org (Mail Delivery System) To: fta@algonet.se
This is the Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.1 (i386) program at host station1.one-socialist-africa.org.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that the message returned below could not be delivered to one or more destinations.
For further assistance, please send mail to <postmaster>
If you do so, please include this problem report. You can delete your own text from the message returned below.
The Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.1 (i386) program
<sfbarbee@localhost.one-socialist-africa.org>: Name service error for domain localhost.one-socialist-africa.org: Host not found
Reporting-MTA: dns; station1.one-socialist-africa.org Arrival-Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 09:15:11 -0400 (EDT)
Final-Recipient: rfc822; sfbarbee@localhost.one-socialist-africa.org Action: failed Status: 5.0.0 Diagnostic-Code: X-Postfix; Name service error for domain localhost.one-socialist-africa.org: Host not found
Subject: Re: [SLE] Updating with Yast2 vs Yast1 Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2001 20:01:00 +0200 From: Gudmund Areskoug <fta@algonet.se> Organization: Free Trade Associates To: SuSE listserve <suse-linux-e@suse.com> References: 1
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq
Had two msg sent yesterday back, the same way. Stefano scsijon wrote:
had 2 myself, maybe someone has set a SuSe Server up on the net and got it not quite right first time, then fixed problem (which is why you can't mail them back) rather than a spammer / intruder.
my 2 bits / hoping scsijon ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jon Clausen" <jonclausen@get2net.dk> To: <suse-linux-e@suse.com> Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 6:11 PM Subject: Re: [SLE] Strange list-related messages
This morning I got the same: (two of them...)
Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 03:19:13 -0400 (EDT) From: MAILER-DAEMON@one-socialist-africa.org (Mail Delivery System) To: jonclausen@get2net.dk
This is the Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.1 (i386) program at host station1.one-socialist-africa.org.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that the message returned below could not be delivered to one or more destinations.
For further assistance, please send mail to <postmaster>
If you do so, please include this problem report. You can delete your own text from the message returned below.
The Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.1 (i386) program
<sfbarbee@localhost.one-socialist-africa.org>: Name service error for domain localhost.one-socialist-africa.org: Host not found
The weird thing is that the message *was* delivered (to suse-linux-e@suse.com) and shows up on the list...?
What's going on?
Is this some kind of socialist conspiracy? ;-)
On Thursday 05 April 2001 10:00, you wrote:
Hi,
now and then I'm getting odd "Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender" messages that have something to do with this list. Sample piece attached below. This morning I got 7 of them, all from the same source.
Am I doing something wrong with my mail program (Netscape on Win$/Kmail on Linux), or what's going on here?
I normally use Reply All and edit the recipient address into only To:suse-linux-e@suse.com
TIA, Gudmund
Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 03:21:44 -0400 (EDT) From: MAILER-DAEMON@one-socialist-africa.org (Mail Delivery System) To: fta@algonet.se
This is the Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.1 (i386) program at host station1.one-socialist-africa.org.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that the message returned below could not be delivered to one or more destinations.
For further assistance, please send mail to <postmaster>
If you do so, please include this problem report. You can delete your own text from the message returned below.
The Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.1 (i386) program
<sfbarbee@localhost.one-socialist-africa.org>: Name service error for domain localhost.one-socialist-africa.org: Host not found
Reporting-MTA: dns; station1.one-socialist-africa.org Arrival-Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 09:15:11 -0400 (EDT)
Final-Recipient: rfc822; sfbarbee@localhost.one-socialist-africa.org Action: failed Status: 5.0.0 Diagnostic-Code: X-Postfix; Name service error for domain localhost.one-socialist-africa.org: Host not found
Subject: Re: [SLE] Updating with Yast2 vs Yast1 Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2001 20:01:00 +0200 From: Gudmund Areskoug <fta@algonet.se> Organization: Free Trade Associates To: SuSE listserve <suse-linux-e@suse.com> References: 1
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq
localhost.one-socialist-africa.org: Host not found
The weird thing is that the message *was* delivered (to suse-linux-e@suse.com) and shows up on the list...?
What's going on?
Is this some kind of socialist conspiracy? ;-)
More likely either Trotskyists or extreme right-wing elements attempting to discredit African socialist Linux users. Sincerely, Makhnovite fifth column.
On Thursday 05 April 2001 10:11, Jon Clausen wrote: <snip>
What's going on?
SuSE's listserver 'bounces' the mails you send to the list to every subscriber. It edits the header to make it seem as though you personally mailed every person on the list. If someone is subscribed with an invalid address, you will get the error messages.
Is this some kind of socialist conspiracy? ;-)
Isn't linux a socialist conspiracy? :) //Anders
Hi, Anders Johansson wrote:
SuSE's listserver 'bounces' the mails you send to the list to every subscriber. It edits the header to make it seem as though you personally mailed every person on the list. If someone is subscribed with an invalid address, you will get the error messages.
yes, of course, should have thought that far myself... I've heard a lot of pro's and con's for default Reply to: -> list, this seems to be one up for Reply to list... Does anyone know how to avoid this? I don't mind a few hundred interesting mails, but I do mind seven junk mails.
Is this some kind of socialist conspiracy? ;-)
Isn't linux a socialist conspiracy? :)
I thought McCarthy was dead ? ;). BR, Gudmund
-----Original Message----- From: Gudmund Areskoug [mailto:fta@algonet.se] Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 5:23 AM To: suse-linux-e@suse.com Subject: Re: [SLE] Strange list-related messages
<snip>
Is this some kind of socialist conspiracy? ;-)
Isn't linux a socialist conspiracy? :)
Socialism is when NOBODY owns anything ('The State' is a fictional character), yet a small group of people who have convinced everyone else that they should run the show CONTROL everything with an iron fist. With Linux, EVERYBODY owns it, yet no one has absolute CONTROL over it, so no, it is actually the opposite of socialism in action.
I thought McCarthy was dead ? ;).
Yes... Dead right... Charles
Hi, I also received this kind of messages 6 times.... :( Jonathan On Thu, 05 Apr 2001, Gudmund Areskoug wrote:
Hi,
now and then I'm getting odd "Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender" messages that have something to do with this list. Sample piece attached below. This morning I got 7 of them, all from the same source.
Am I doing something wrong with my mail program (Netscape on Win$/Kmail on Linux), or what's going on here?
I normally use Reply All and edit the recipient address into only To:suse-linux-e@suse.com
TIA, Gudmund
Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 03:21:44 -0400 (EDT) From: MAILER-DAEMON@one-socialist-africa.org (Mail Delivery System) To: fta@algonet.se
This is the Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.1 (i386) program at host station1.one-socialist-africa.org.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that the message returned below could not be delivered to one or more destinations.
For further assistance, please send mail to <postmaster>
If you do so, please include this problem report. You can delete your own text from the message returned below.
The Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.1 (i386) program
<sfbarbee@localhost.one-socialist-africa.org>: Name service error for domain localhost.one-socialist-africa.org: Host not found
Reporting-MTA: dns; station1.one-socialist-africa.org Arrival-Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 09:15:11 -0400 (EDT)
Final-Recipient: rfc822; sfbarbee@localhost.one-socialist-africa.org Action: failed Status: 5.0.0 Diagnostic-Code: X-Postfix; Name service error for domain localhost.one-socialist-africa.org: Host not found
Subject: Re: [SLE] Updating with Yast2 vs Yast1 Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2001 20:01:00 +0200 From: Gudmund Areskoug <fta@algonet.se> Organization: Free Trade Associates To: SuSE listserve <suse-linux-e@suse.com> References: 1
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq -- Jonathan J. Terbio
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
I received the message twice, then I received a dozen messages about the two messages, then I wrote a message about all those messages. I think I will receive this very message shortly. After that I will probably receive some more messages about this message and the other messages about the messages I received about someone not getting their messages. On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 04:37:58PM +0800, Jonathan Terbio wrote:
Hi,
I also received this kind of messages 6 times.... :(
Jonathan
-- Corvin Russell <corvinr@sympatico.ca>
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001 10:48:38 -0400 Corvin Russell <corvinr@sympatico.ca> wrote:
I received the message twice, then I received a dozen messages about the two messages, then I wrote a message about all those messages. I think I will receive this very message shortly. After that I will probably receive some more messages about this message and the other messages about the messages I received about someone not getting their messages.
I think we get the message. Geoff _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
O.K. I don't think I sent you any messages Corvin, but I assume it's because people *just* reply to messages, not checking where they're going? Anyway: Would it not be feasible for postmaster@suse (or whoever) to set it up so invalid adresses get filtered out of the adresslist? Or rather: I presume it's already set up, so maybe the question would be "why don't it work in this case?" <flamebait> I mean, this is ridiculous... When you sign up for the list, a valid email-adress is mandatory, is it not? IMO it should be. And don't new subscribers get verification, by email? And if *that* one bounces, surely it makes no sense adding that adress on the list??? I mean - I do *not* want to set up filters for this... </flamebait> my .005$ BTW: Any luck Jeffrey? Jon Clausen On Thursday 05 April 2001 16:58, you wrote:
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001 10:48:38 -0400
Corvin Russell <corvinr@sympatico.ca> wrote:
I received the message twice, then I received a dozen messages about the two messages, then I wrote a message about all those messages. I think I will receive this very message shortly. After that I will probably receive some more messages about this message and the other messages about the messages I received about someone not getting their messages.
I think we get the message.
Geoff
_________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Hi, Does anyone know if it is possible to install SuSE 7.1 on a machine that has not got an A: drive or a bootable CDROM? The machine in question has already got SuSE 6.1 installed and I can mount the 7.1 CD's, but can't work out how to start an installation? Cheers Phil
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Phil Shrimpton wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know if it is possible to install SuSE 7.1 on a machine that has not got an A: drive or a bootable CDROM?
The machine in question has already got SuSE 6.1 installed and I can mount the 7.1 CD's, but can't work out how to start an installation?
As root, simply type 'yast'. Select your CD-ROM as source media, and it'll mount it for you. It'll almost immediately tell you that you need a newer version of yast, so it'll install that rpm only, then quit. Start the process over again. This time it'll let you upgrade the base system packages. After a reboot, it'll install the rest of the packages. Another method, which worked with a 5.x release, and I don't know if it's still supported in 7.1: Boot the machine into DOS, (If you have dual-boot set-up), mount the CDROM. Look in the root and /dosutils directory of the CDROM, and you just might find a copy of loadlin, and maybe a batch file to execute it. It'll re-boot into Linux as if you'd booted from the CD, and the install can proceed normally from there. With this method, you can do a 'full' install if you desire. Making the jump from 6.1 to 7.1, that is probably recommended. Is this machine in question a laptop? Does it's BIOS support an external floppy, which you don't happen to own? I've discovered that the parallel-port external floppy drives are mostly interchangeable. I have a Dell external floppy, which I have used on Gateway and NEC machines as well. Do you have a neighbor that will loan you a possibly-compatible floppy drive? On my gateway, with non-hot-swappable CDROM and Floppy drive, I mounted the floppy, plugged in a PCMCIA network card, booted from floppy, and did the install 'borrowing' the CD-ROM drive on a nearby desktop machine. Yast supports ftp, nfs, as well as smb protocol, so just about any network-aware machine can be used. Finally, here's an off-the-wall idea: Rummage around on the CD, and find the kernel image that they're booting. THen add a section to your own /etc/lilo.conf which will pull the kernel, initrd, and init=linuxrc from the CDROM. Mebbe you can fool your machine into booting from the CD-ROM! -- Rick Green "I have the heart of a little child, and the brain of a genius. ... and I keep them in a jar under my bed"
From: Rick Green
Hi,
Does anyone know if it is possible to install SuSE 7.1 on a machine that has not got an A: drive or a bootable CDROM?
As root, simply type 'yast'. Select your CD-ROM as source media, and it'll mount it for you. It'll almost immediately tell you that you need a newer version of yast, so it'll install that rpm only, then quit. Start the process over again. This time it'll let you upgrade the base system packages. After a reboot, it'll install the rest of the packages.
That works, thanks a lot. It would be good if Yast had a 'real' option to do this. Cheers Phil
I am sure that the user subscribed under valid address. The e-mails would have not made it as far as it did if it wasn't. What has happened is that one of our fellow SuSE users has messed up his/her SuSE 7.1 Postfix configuration. It is getting bounced back because a DNS lookup on the bogus domain name fails. I have tried piecing together an address out of bits in the header. Didn't work. Presumably because it is redirected internally to a different username than the original username. It is a Road Runner user in North Carolina. I have a few more things to try. Jeffrey Quoting Jon Clausen <jonclausen@get2net.dk>:
O.K. I don't think I sent you any messages Corvin, but I assume it's because people *just* reply to messages, not checking where they're going?
Anyway: Would it not be feasible for postmaster@suse (or whoever) to set it up so invalid adresses get filtered out of the adresslist? Or rather: I presume it's already set up, so maybe the question would be "why don't it work in this case?"
<flamebait> I mean, this is ridiculous... When you sign up for the list, a valid email-adress is mandatory, is it not? IMO it should be. And don't new subscribers get verification, by email? And if *that* one bounces, surely it makes no sense adding that adress on the list??? I mean - I do *not* want to set up filters for this... </flamebait>
my .005$
BTW: Any luck Jeffrey?
Jon Clausen
On Thursday 05 April 2001 16:58, you wrote:
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001 10:48:38 -0400
Corvin Russell <corvinr@sympatico.ca> wrote:
I received the message twice, then I received a dozen messages about the two messages, then I wrote a message about all those messages. I think I will receive this very message shortly. After that I will probably receive some more messages about this message and the other messages about the messages I received about someone not getting their messages.
I think we get the message.
Geoff
_________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
-- I don't do Windows and I don't come to work before nine. -- Johnny Paycheck
On Thursday 05 April 2001 10:13, Jon Clausen wrote:
O.K. I don't think I sent you any messages Corvin, but I assume it's because people *just* reply to messages, not checking where they're going?
Anyway: Would it not be feasible for postmaster@suse (or whoever) to set it up so invalid adresses get filtered out of the adresslist? Or rather: I presume it's already set up, so maybe the question would be "why don't it work in this case?"
Because the TO: field contains email address that don't require passing though SuSE's maillist server.
<flamebait> I mean, this is ridiculous... When you sign up for the list, a valid email-adress is mandatory, is it not? IMO it should be. And don't new subscribers get verification, by email? And if *that* one bounces, surely it makes no sense adding that adress on the list??? I mean - I do *not* want to set up filters for this... </flamebait>
my .005$
BTW: Any luck Jeffrey?
Jon Clausen
On Thursday 05 April 2001 16:58, you wrote:
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001 10:48:38 -0400
Corvin Russell <corvinr@sympatico.ca> wrote:
I received the message twice, then I received a dozen messages about the two messages, then I wrote a message about all those messages. I think I will receive this very message shortly. After that I will probably receive some more messages about this message and the other messages about the messages I received about someone not getting their messages.
I think we get the message.
Geoff
_________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
On Thursday 05 April 2001 09:48, Corvin Russell wrote:
I received the message twice, then I received a dozen messages about the two messages, then I wrote a message about all those messages. I think I will receive this very message shortly. After that I will probably receive some more messages about this message and the other messages about the messages I received about someone not getting their messages.
That's probably because you do what I and many others do, respond using the 'everyone' button. The everyone button causes the suse list addr, the orginal senders addr and the various respondents addrs to appear in the TO: field. Right clicking on the suse email string and selecting 'Reply to' will cause just suse's email addr to appear in the TO: field. I do the everyone button because a lot of folks like the reply going directly to their mail box even if they don't download from the suse list server. JLK
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 04:37:58PM +0800, Jonathan Terbio wrote:
Hi,
I also received this kind of messages 6 times.... :(
Jonathan
On Thu, 05 Apr 2001 10:00:56 +0200, Gudmund Areskoug said: | <sfbarbee@localhost.one-socialist-africa.org>: Name service error | for domain | localhost.one-socialist-africa.org: Host not found | The have misconfigured postfix on their mailserver. I performs a DNS lookup for localhost, which clearly fails here. Someone should wake the guy up... -- ---------------------------------------------------- Koos Pol T: +31 20 3116122 Systems Administrator F: +31 20 3116200 Compuware Europe B.V. E: koos_pol@nl.compuware.com Amsterdam PGP public key available
participants (18)
-
Anders Johansson -
Charles Marcus -
Corvin Russell -
Fergus Wilde -
Greisberger Christophe -
Gudmund Areskoug -
Jeffrey Taylor -
Jerry Kreps -
Jon Clausen -
Jonathan Terbio -
Koos Pol -
Michael Hasenstein -
Phil Shrimpton -
quintaq＠yahoo.co.uk -
Rick Green -
scsijon -
Stefano Papini -
Togan Muftuoglu