Does anyone know if it is safe to upgrade GLIBC to the one from the factory on a SUSE 10.0 box. === Details I want to upgrade to the latest Rails 1.1 release on my SUSE 10.0 box. It requires Ruby 1.8.4 which is available from the SUSE factory. It has dependency on libc.so.6 Which I think is part of GLIBC_2.4 which I think is in the factory. Greg -- Greg Freemyer The Norcross Group Forensics for the 21st Century
Never mind the below. I forgot I got the source.rpm from the factory and compiled it myself to get 1.8.3 I'll just do that again for 1.8.4 Greg On 4/4/06, Greg Freemyer <greg.freemyer@gmail.com> wrote:
Does anyone know if it is safe to upgrade GLIBC to the one from the factory on a SUSE 10.0 box.
=== Details I want to upgrade to the latest Rails 1.1 release on my SUSE 10.0 box.
It requires Ruby 1.8.4 which is available from the SUSE factory.
It has dependency on libc.so.6
Which I think is part of GLIBC_2.4 which I think is in the factory.
Greg -- Greg Freemyer The Norcross Group Forensics for the 21st Century
-- Greg Freemyer The Norcross Group Forensics for the 21st Century
On Tue, 4 Apr 2006 14:23:58 -0400, Greg Freemyer wrote:
Does anyone know if it is safe to upgrade GLIBC to the one from the factory on a SUSE 10.0 box.
If you do not run factory, do yourself a favor and download the .src.rpm of Rails and build the binary rpm on your system. That's *much* safer then upgrading glibc. Philipp
participants (2)
-
Greg Freemyer -
Philipp Thomas