From: Curtis Rey
To: Jonathan Drews , Yuri K CC: suse-linux-e@suse.com Subject: Re: [SLE] Linux Commercial Idea as a flop. Date: Sun, 13 May 2001 03:38:21 -0500 As a newbie/Linux novice I can agree with the point about not wanting to deal with "broken apps and half baked stuff". I already have a degree in health care and really don't relish returning to school to learn how to setup and run my OS. I chose Linux because a) It gets me away from M$ (don't get me started on XP/.NET/Hailstorm) and b) because I learn something about the thing I spend most of my time with-the computer. Sure, I would like to learn programming. But I don't want to do so to make it my profession. It's just like medicine. You teach your patient about health care and taking care of themselves. However, you don't expect then to mix there own IV solutions or run their own X-ray machine. It's similar with designing an OS that is to be used by the general public. Open Source is wonderful because the makers can design a system to meet their desires. But, if you want the general public to get behind it and support/use it you'll have to make function on their level. Linux is getting close to this and still gets its geek underpinnigs (geek is not to be taken as derogatory). It will become widely accepted when the common user doesn't have to consider taking night classes in comp sci in order to set up a firewall.
See this is where I think the newbies get it wrong. I understand your argument about how one person doesn't have to be a MD to perform small task healthcare on yourself. But here is the problem. Does Linux fit this bill? Yeah in Windows you can push and click your way through things but in Linux the console and commands in my mind are unavoidable. Plus they are the most powerful enttiies which come with a Unix OS. And you mentioned a person shouldn't have to know how to work an IV. I consider a firewall a highly sophisticated instrument and I do not think it is the duty of the programming community to spend ten years on the development of a utility til they finally managed to make it usable by every person out there. Firewalls I think belong in the domain of the more educated computer professionals. Now if SuSE thinks its their job to break this barrier then go ahead but I don't believe in this. I doubt a person would get much support from any government to run a business which teaches 'PlugnPlay IVs' to the general public. I support the fact to improve things but I am choosy about what should be improved simply because of the reward we get for the investment done. mk _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ and for that very reason you are using a web based MUA based on closed
* Purple Shirt
On Sunday 13 May 2001 06:23, Togan Muftuoglu wrote:
* Purple Shirt
[010513 14:18]: Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ and for that very reason you are using a web based MUA based on closed source.
DOH!!! (or was that DOS?). Sounds a little arrogant to be honest, to be saying that having a basic gui interface to setup some needed features unwarrented and that setting up such features should be left to the realm of a professional (and yes patients learn to run their own IV - at home, etc. Just not in the hospital where trained personal are available). The human being learns best through multiple modalities - lexiconal, Iconal, auditory, and tactile - hence why gui's are a viable interface for the end-user. And yes the console is a useful and needed feature. The biggest problem that I have is with the current state of documentation. I wouldn't mind setting up a firewall from scratch if the documentation was written with so many assumed givens (and not out of date). It's not about trying to dive into the complexities of Linux, it's about the time to sort through vague and poorly written docs and then spending not just hours or days, but weeks hunting down adjunct documentation on a given subject to get the fulliest understanding (beleive me hunting down documentation is my middle name and part in parcel to my profession - and Latin aint no stranger to me either, try doing DNA and biochem/physiol/anatomy........). Its about time vs returns for expenditures. I would love to just sit down and spend all the time I wanted learning to run my Linux box, go to all the LUG meetings I could, and maybe hire a Linux guru to come over once or twice a week to teach me. Unfortunately, that aint gonna happen - too busy, too many things to do otherwise. I want a reliable system (hence my interest with Linux, or disgust with M$) and I want it safe and secure and to be able to set it up myself. I just want something that will make it easier to understand and more accessable.
All, It would be nice if we could stick to subject matter for this list. At the best of time it is a high traffic list. This sort of thing makes it impossible. This list is, IMHO one of the very best sites available for Linux technical support, and it has some of the very best people on it helping out. There are plenty of lists out there for discussing other matters. Please use them, and remember that it's not necessary to have the last word, you can just leave the matter. Too much extranious matter on the list will destroy its usefulness to the Linux community and will cause potential new Linux users who are unable to get assistance to be lost. alan
On Sunday 13 May 2001 13:40, Alan Lenton wrote:
All,
It would be nice if we could stick to subject matter for this list. At the best of time it is a high traffic list. This sort of thing makes it impossible.
This list is, IMHO one of the very best sites available for Linux technical support, and it has some of the very best people on it helping out. There are plenty of lists out there for discussing other matters. Please use them, and remember that it's not necessary to have the last word, you can just leave the matter.
Too much extranious matter on the list will destroy its usefulness to the Linux community and will cause potential new Linux users who are unable to get assistance to be lost.
alan
Amen. Terence
Well, this list is like a group of friends...something like Cheers. When you come in they scream your name and bring you into the fold. It's always been like this. There is a lot of technical talk (shop talk), personal talk, arguements..etc. It's a very community list, not just a help list. It's been like this since the day I joined this list almost 3.5 years ago. It probably won't be changing anytime soon because if it did change then it would loose it's charm and the ability to be such a great place to pose questions. When your into this list and talking about SuSE Linux you learn a lot, but you do put up with something things. It's a bit like asking Grandpa for advice...you have to hear the story first before you get the info your looking for...and I personally wouldn't change a thing. It's just how is. It's why we use procmail ;) Fond Regards, * Terence McCarthy (saki@cwcom.net) [010513 09:33]: ->On Sunday 13 May 2001 13:40, Alan Lenton wrote: ->> All, ->> ->> It would be nice if we could stick to subject matter for this list. At the ->> best of time it is a high traffic list. This sort of thing makes it ->> impossible. ->> ->> This list is, IMHO one of the very best sites available for Linux technical ->> support, and it has some of the very best people on it helping out. There ->> are plenty of lists out there for discussing other matters. Please use ->> them, and remember that it's not necessary to have the last word, you can ->> just leave the matter. ->> ->> Too much extranious matter on the list will destroy its usefulness to the ->> Linux community and will cause potential new Linux users who are unable to ->> get assistance to be lost. ->> ->> alan -> ->Amen. -- Ben Rosenberg mailto:ben@whack.org ----- If two men agree on everything, you can be sure that only one of them is doing the thinking.
* Ben Rosenberg
about SuSE Linux you learn a lot, but you do put up with something things. It's a bit like asking Grandpa for advice...you have to hear the story first before you get the info your looking for...and I personally wouldn't change a thing. It's just how is. It's why we use procmail ;)
And there are people who can help you to get procmail working You only will get that message once or twice until you leran to set the new rule On the other hand if you are using KDE2.1 and you happen to have the package kaptain installed you will realise it is not that difficult to setup a basic procmail recipe for your needs. Just a quick note about kaptain it can be started with kaptainshell but it should be corrected like this ( C for quality control for this package's maintaner at SuSE) #!/opt/kde2/bin/kaptain start-> list buttons; list "Files in /opt/kde2/share/grammars" -> @list(`cd /opt/kde2/share/grammars;ls *.kaptn`); buttons :horizontal -> @fork(command)="Start" @close="Close"; command -> "kaptain /opt/kde2/share/grammars/" list; -- Togan Muftuoglu
I agree completely, I have been subscribed to this list since version 5.3... and the list has always maintained it community like spirit.IMO this is another great advantage of SuSE... the tolerance of people discussing what they want, it lends itself to the close knit community without having to be worried about getting flamed to death because someone asks an obivious question. (As I've heard takes place on other linux lists) I really dont think this is a high traffice list, it does about 100 messages a day and for the most part they are usually informative to some degree (depending on where one is at, at the time). I'd say it all comes down to free speach, everyone here has the rite to post what they want, and usually the bs posts just get ignored, while the core discussions carry on. On a side note, I will say one thing that is a small problem is exact duplicate messages. I suspect this due to sending the mail with kmail. It might help if people check their mouse setting in K. The single click sometimes is too fast and I guess the message gets fired off twice. You can see this with messages sent by the same person at exactly the same time. even still, I can deal with that have fun rob Ben Rosenberg wrote:
Well, this list is like a group of friends...something like Cheers. When you come in they scream your name and bring you into the fold. It's always been like this. There is a lot of technical talk (shop talk), personal talk, arguements..etc. It's a very community list, not just a help list. It's been like this since the day I joined this list almost 3.5 years ago. It probably won't be changing anytime soon because if it did change then it would loose it's charm and the ability to be such a great place to pose questions. When your into this list and talking about SuSE Linux you learn a lot, but you do put up with something things. It's a bit like asking Grandpa for advice...you have to hear the story first before you get the info your looking for...and I personally wouldn't change a thing. It's just how is. It's why we use procmail ;)
But here is the problem. Does Linux fit this bill?
Yes, for the most part I think it does.
Yeah in Windows you can push and click your way through things but in Linux the console and commands in my mind are unavoidable. Plus they are the most powerful enttiies which come with a Unix OS. And you mentioned a person shouldn't
Who cares if they are powerful? If a new user can be pleased with the system without them, there is no reason to make them use the shell. They will use it if and when they need it (personally, I see the prompt as a useful tool, but I would much rather be using a pleasant window for my mail, file management, etc.).
have to know how to work an IV. I consider a firewall a highly sophisticated instrument and I do not think it is the duty of the programming community to spend ten years on the development of a utility til they finally managed to make it usable by every person out there.
Who said they should spend ten years? Anyway, why do you seemingly reject anything that attempts to make life easier in Linux?
Firewalls I think belong in the domain of the more educated computer professionals. Now if SuSE thinks its their job to break this barrier then go ahead but I don't believe in this. I doubt a person would get much support from any government to run a business which teaches 'PlugnPlay IVs'
True. You are right about IV's. Unfortunately with broadband becoming popular the non-geek public will eventually need to learn how to do things like setup firewalls. Let's face it, if we are happy where we are, eventually Linux will be passed up by Microsoft (!) in quality and stability. We must not be content to leave things in a cryptic fashion. The GUI is the future of computing, that doesn't mean the shell must go, it just means that the shell is no longer the centerpiece of the UI. -Tim -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Timothy R. Butler Universal Networks Information Tech. Consultant Christian Web Services Since 1996 ICQ #12495932 AIM: Uninettm An Authorized IPSwitch Reseller tbutler@uninetsolutions.com http://www.uninetsolutions.com ============== "Information Powered by Innovation" ==============
Purple Shirt wrote:
From: Curtis Rey
But, if you want the general public to get behind it and support/use it you'll have to make function on their level. But here is the problem. Does Linux fit this bill? Yeah in Windows you can push and click your way through things but in Linux the console and commands in my mind are unavoidable.
sigh... the thing is, *I* have a degree in Computer Science, plus 10 years experience in working in programming with sh, C and Java and Unix computer system administration - all on various platforms of Unix. I have YET to see any command line commands that can not be duplicated with a well written text menu or GUI. I think if people want Linux to succeed in the wider market, then they will HAVE to invest time in making the installation more fool-proof (have the installation memorize the choices made in installation and automatically create a script so I don't have to do it myself) and in making it easier all around to do things without having to know the details. I use the command line for sysadmin when I must - I love it for writing scripts. People prefer push-n-click in dealing with stuff - *I* prefer it, because I don't WANT to spend days learning new software to be able to install it. I simply do not have the interest or time. I only want it to work with minimal effort on my part. Sun Solaris can be set up to do this. It doesn't usually take a ton of effort to set things up on Sun machines. It doesn't take a ton of effort to figure out how to make installations automatic using Sun machines. I've watched Linux since the beginning, pretty much. I installed it a couple of times. I decided it was not work my effort, because the thing was simply changing too much and took too much effort on my part, and did not have a decent user interface, compared to other UNIX installations. I would rather pay for quality and support than have something free just because its free or has some neat licensing. I'm currently using linux because it was here when I got to this location (transferred in). I would prefer Sun because their OS is more robust and I get more support. But Linux is certainly getting there.
Plus they are the most powerful enttiies which come with a Unix OS. And you mentioned a person shouldn't have to know how to work an IV. I consider a firewall a highly sophisticated instrument and I do not think it is the duty of the programming community to spend ten years on the development of a utility til they finally managed to make it usable by every person out there. Firewalls I think belong in the domain of the more educated computer professionals.
Oh please! It would not be hard to design and code a front end that would prompt the user for options (with help to describe them if needed) and then run the commands in the background with the given options. It doesn't take 10 years to develop front ends - for anyone with experience in trying to please users. There are fields within the computer community that specialize in designing user friendly applications (I don't think MS has figured this out though).
I doubt a person would get much support from any government to run a business which teaches 'PlugnPlay IVs' to the general public.
Why not? There's now a plugNPlay piece of hardware that shocks people having a heart attack that almost ANYONE can use. Its saving lifes. I think if people can design something like that to be usable by the average joe, it should be a snap to design a front end for system administration (including firewalls) that works well and is user friendly. This is certainly true for the desktop, which seems to be rapidly improving. Walter
sigh... the thing is, *I* have a degree in Computer Science, plus 10 years experience in working in programming with sh, C and Java and Unix computer system administration - all on various platforms of Unix. I have YET to see any command line commands that can not be duplicated with a well written text menu or GUI.
I have yet to see a decent text or GUI mechanism for creating shell pipelines - UNIX or Windows. Regular expressions are another one. Writing GUIs for simple commands isn't that difficult. Converting the power of the UNIX shell into a GUI is not yet possible, and maybe never will be. I would suggest that anyone who thinks it's just a case of arranging enough buttons doesn't really know the power of the shell interface.
Derek Fountain wrote:
sigh... the thing is, *I* have a degree in Computer Science, plus 10 years experience in working in programming with sh, C and Java and Unix computer system administration - all on various platforms of Unix. I have YET to see any command line commands that can not be duplicated with a well written text menu or GUI.
I have yet to see a decent text or GUI mechanism for creating shell pipelines - UNIX or Windows. Regular expressions are another one. Writing GUIs for simple commands isn't that difficult. Converting the power of the UNIX shell into a GUI is not yet possible, and maybe never will be. I would suggest that anyone who thinks it's just a case of arranging enough buttons doesn't really know the power of the shell interface.
You can suggest what you like. NeXT and AIX (which is from the company you apparently work for) both have had decent sysadmin tools (not great, maybe but nice none the less) long before they were thought of in Linux. I loved that you could see the underlying commands that would be run when you used AIX's system administration tool (I can't recall its name at the moment). This made it useful for those who began system administration in another system to pick up the new flavor easily and be able to write scripts that were targeted to other needs. Anyone who thinks shell commands can't be well scripted has not seen the powerful and useful scripts available. I've written some and seen many others. This does not mean that such a system would be fast. But I've seen people be thrilled with the availability of a front-end and suffer through some slowness rather than have to figure out the underlying system. CVS is an example. As for GUI's, its much more than a few buttons, but it's do-able. Any GUI would of course by much more useful and powerful if the underlying tools were written in such a way as to be able to link them in and be able to do exception handling rather than having to be concerned with system()-, or pout()-type calls and catching text or an exit code from the system, but they are do-able none the less. Don't get me wrong, I love the commandline for the fact that I *CAN* write scripts I think are useful to me. But I don't want to do that for trivial things - I think that should be provided by the system itself. And without GUId front-ends (as well as useful tools and fun games), the mass market will remain uninterested in linux.
participants (10)
-
Alan Lenton
-
Ben Rosenberg
-
Curtis Rey
-
Derek Fountain
-
dizzy73
-
Purple Shirt
-
Terence McCarthy
-
Timothy R.Butler
-
Togan Muftuoglu
-
Walter Moore