I'd like to suggest that if nice fonts matter to you, that you at least test, if not switch to permanently, either:

1-choose a display resolution that calculates as close as possible to exactly 96 DPI for your display (only if your display is not a flat panel, otherwise stick to the flat panel's native resolution), or

2-choose the highest display resolution your display supports for your choice of color depth. This is not always the same as the highest resolution your monitor's specs claim.

Thanks for the answers. I read the NVIDIA driver's README file and it said that the values specified in xorg.conf file are overridden by the values supplied by EDID/DDC. So one have to use the option Option "UseEDIDDpi" "FALSE" for making xorg.conf's own DPI setting into effect. Really, after diasabling UseEDIDDpi xpdyinfo reported the correct dimensions. Now turning back to your advice, changing the resolution to higher: I would like to keep 1024x768 @ 85Hz (LG Flatron 17" CRT monitor, 16" diagonal viewable). Setting dimensions to the real monitor values (325x244 mm) gives ~80 DPI. What if I raise DPI by applying false dimensions, eg 271x203 mm (what should give ~96 DPI)? Or setting dimensions to 345x260 mm what should give ~75 DPI? Which one would be better and how does it affect resolution for other stuff than fonts? Thanks, IG ___________________________________________Kössön utasbiztosítást a síszezon idejére! http://www.biztositas.hu/origo/utas -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org

On 2007/01/26 15:31 (GMT+0100) Istvan Gabor apparently typed:

Felix Miata wrote:

...

I'd like to suggest that if nice fonts matter to you, that you at least test...

Now turning back to your advice, changing the resolution to higher: I would like to keep 1024x768 @ 85Hz (LG Flatron 17"

Any particular reason why you prefer this common low resolution to high quality? (high resolution = high quality, so the higher the resolution, the better quality of detail, just like in a high resolution satellite photo or high resolution scanner)

CRT monitor, 16" diagonal viewable). Setting dimensions to the real monitor values (325x244 mm) gives ~80 DPI.

What if I raise DPI by applying false dimensions, eg 271x203 mm (what should give ~96 DPI)?

Fonts and system windows will be bigger. You'll be seeing things much like a typical windoz user sees things, as 96 is the default on doz, and your display size is pretty common.

Or setting dimensions to 345x260 mm what should give ~75 DPI?

Fonts and system windows will be smaller, and fonts generally less well defined on account of being created using fewer px per any given physical size character.

Which one would be better and how does it affect resolution for other stuff than fonts?

You have to try and see what suits you. That's why I wrote what I wrote originally (quoted above). -- "I have come that they may have life, and have it to the full." John 10:10 NIV Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 Felix Miata *** http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org

On 2007/01/29 15:39 (GMT+0100) Istvan Gabor apparently typed:

...

Any particular reason why you prefer this common low resolution to high quality? (high resolution = high quality, so the higher the resolution, the better quality of detail, just like in a high resolution satellite photo or high resolution scanner)

Since 1024x768 is the maximum resolution @85 Hz. All higher resolutions are @<85 Hz on my monitor.

Can you actually tell the difference between 85 and 75 or 80? Even if you can, I still suggest you test as I originally suggested, to see with your own eyes what high resolution can do for fonts. It seems to me that running a display at its maximum refresh would be like running a car full throttle all the time, which accelerates wear and shortens life. I run all mine at 60. Not everybody's eyes can see or are bothered by screen flicker. -- "I have come that they may have life, and have it to the full." John 10:10 NIV Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 Felix Miata *** http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org

On 2007/01/30 00:26 (GMT+0900) Masaru Nomiya apparently typed:

Felix Miata has written:

...

I run all mine at 60. Not everybody's eyes can see or are bothered by screen flicker.

Are you talikng about CRT display? I feel you are using LCD displays....

My only LCD is less than 5 months old. I have 10 CRTs. I have run them all at 60 ever since last century, except if running windoz with a video driver that won't let me specify the refresh I wish. -- "I have come that they may have life, and have it to the full." John 10:10 NIV Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 Felix Miata *** http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org