Well, since this is only the 6th of April I guess I shouldn't be to insulted. In what way was 10.1 hosed? I have several boxes running on the x86_64 version and they seem to be doing just fine. Is there cause for concern? Tim Donnelly Systems/Network Administrator Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries (303)759-3399 x106 On Fri Apr 6 12:19 , M Harris sent: On Friday 06 April 2007 13:54, Tim Donnelly wrote:
Somehow my disc one of my OpenSuse 10.1 x86 set has gotten messed up. I can't seem to find where "old" versions are available on the opensuse.org site.
Can someone provide me a link? I think this just became the funniest post so far for the month of April...
... openSUSE 10.1 *WAS* messed up for everyone... except those of us smart enough not to load it... sheeeesh... so, uh, why would you want to reload it from a know good, uh I mean messed up, disk? :-))))) -- Kind regards, M Harris <>< -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
On Friday 06 April 2007 14:22, Tim Donnelly wrote:
In what way was 10.1 hosed? I have several boxes running on the x86_64 version and they seem to be doing just fine. Is there cause for concern? I was mostly kidding with you...
... mainly the updater was hosed... and those concerns were eventually fixed... but if you look back over the archives the problems with 10.1 were pretty scary, and what I mean by that is that they created fear uncertainty and doubt (hahahah) in many of us... so we waited till 10.2... and then some of us still didn't load it... just to see what happened to everyone else first. HA! It looks like 10.2 for the most part is ok... but if you monitor the bugzilla list opensuse-bugs@opensuse.org you will notice tons of them... so, I'm still waiting. -- Kind regards, M Harris <>< -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
so, I'm still waiting.
For what? ... for a release of openSUSE that will more stable and bug-free than it currently is! I know... SLES and SLED are for that... and openSUSE is *supposed* to be bleeding edge... but common... yous guys got to know that
On Friday 06 April 2007 14:43, Anders Johansson wrote: there is a difference between bleeding edge and beta... as in bleed to death... but uff-da... I digress.... Actually, yous guys are doing a pretty good job... all in all... except for that little Novell thingy... :-P -- Kind regards, M Harris <>< -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
... for a release of openSUSE that will more stable and bug-free than it currently is! I know... SLES and SLED are for that... and openSUSE is *supposed* to be bleeding edge...
Dunno... 10.2 is pretty rock solid for me. I've had zero problems that were not self induced. Fast stable etc etc. Granted I DON'T use zmd/zen/rug or whatever it's called... so.. give that zmd isn't installed and borking things up, 10.2 is the most stable and bug free SUSE I've had in a long time... since 9.3 I'd say. C. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
Clayton wrote:
... for a release of openSUSE that will more stable and bug-free than it currently is! I know... SLES and SLED are for that... and openSUSE is *supposed* to be bleeding edge...
Dunno... 10.2 is pretty rock solid for me. I've had zero problems that were not self induced. Fast stable etc etc. Granted I DON'T use zmd/zen/rug or whatever it's called... so.. give that zmd isn't installed and borking things up, 10.2 is the most stable and bug free SUSE I've had in a long time... since 9.3 I'd say.
C. Well......................except for Hal and Stupid.............er.............uh..........I mean Smart. Oh yeah, and don't forget that stupid dog thingy. AND, can someone explain in SIMPLE English just what the h-e-double hockey sticks Aparmor is supposed to do. Near as I can tell all it does is take up space on my hard drive.
As for the Zen thing. Well, I find it quite useful, as long as you don't install the "updater" portion. If you don't install Zen Updater openSuSE Updater gets installed by default. -- (o:]>*HUGGLES*<[:o) Billie Walsh The three best words in the English Language: "I LOVE YOU" Pass them on! -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
Well......................except for Hal and
Never had a complaint about Hal. It just works for me. I do not need fixed mount points for automounted devices. I have never had it fail on me.
Stupid.............er.............uh..........I mean Smart.
Well.. Stupid/Smart isn't technically "part" of the default distro. I agree it's an annoying app - SmartGUI that is - compared to more intuitive and informative apps like Synaptic. I've been told by "those in the know" that the SmartGUI is undergoing a major overhaul, and the new interface should be more user friendly and less of an out of touch developer's idea of what is good. Fingers crossed.
and don't forget that stupid dog thingy.
Not installed... so no problem. :-) It does work in 10.2 though (in mine at least). I did have it running for a while, and when I did use it, it worked. I don't need it... I know where all my personal files are, so removed it as a redundant app
AND, can someone explain in SIMPLE English just what the h-e-double hockey sticks Aparmor is supposed to do. Near as I can tell all it does is take up space on my hard drive.
Curtis Rey had a good comment on AppArmor a few months ago (3 January): "If you're running AppArmor - Don't! It can interfere with apps and /dev access - it's designed for Enterprise/network servers with access to the outside world - generally overkill for home users and non-servers."
As for the Zen thing. Well, I find it quite useful, as long as you don't install the "updater" portion. If you don't install Zen Updater openSuSE Updater gets installed by default.
I noticed the openSUSE updater thing when I hunted down and killed Zen. I also stopped the openSUSE updater. I use Smart on a regular basis and my apps are all on the rather gory bleeding edge. So... 10.2 and problems... I see mainly Zen, Beagle/Kerry and AppArmor that people complain about as simply not working or causing untold levels of havoc on their installs. None of these 3 are critical, and can simply be removed without really being missed. Some don't like Hal for various reasons, but it seems to be rare that it's actually Hal that's broken.... more like personal choice where the user doesn't like how Hal handles mount points. Dunno... still seems to me that 10.2 is a pretty dang good release (after the post release patches are applied) :-) The core of it works very well. Like all software, it will never be perfect... but, as long as future releases work as good as or better than 10.2 I'm a happy camper. I have recommended 10.2 to a whole lot of people... first time users.. and they are getting on very well with it. C. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
On Saturday 07 April 2007 01:27, Clayton wrote:
So... 10.2 and problems... I see mainly Zen, Beagle/Kerry and AppArmor that people complain about as simply not working or causing untold levels of havoc on their installs. None of these 3 are critical, and can simply be removed without really being missed.
I was in the same camp, but recently Joe Shaw, a Beagle main developer visited this list. See comments: http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse/2007-03/msg03067.html Some people reported satisfaction. I was avoiding it just because of posts of dissatisfaction, but it was never removed since zmd removal solved the problem, and it was actually running unconfigured. You can see from comments in the thread, currently the problem is not Beagle, but some other processes including zmd. So I tried Beagle. I use KDE, the frontend (the controll panell for actual Beagle demon) is Kerry Beagle. Configure what directories to look, and what not, which is not precondition that Default configuration makes Beagel usefull, but configuration what directories to look, and what not, is a big help to find local files, and exclude directories that you don't want to be indexed. Now I can agree with guys think it is easy to get used to Beagle services. -- Regards, Rajko. http://en.opensuse.org/Portal -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
Some people reported satisfaction. I was avoiding it just because of posts of dissatisfaction, but it was never removed since zmd removal solved the problem, and it was actually running unconfigured.
Well with Beagle, I can see it being useful if you (meaning an average end user) are not organized and don't know where things are. For the most part I simply don't have a use for Beagle. I know where all my data is. It's all sorted into logical (for me) locations., and I can find it when I need to just by opening the right directory. I have yet to see a real use for Beagle... I'm sure it's there or it wouldn't be a part of the GUI desktop... but at least in my case, I have yet to actually see a practical use for it. I did have it installed for a while, and tinkered with it.. configured it... didn't have any issues with it... removed it because I didn't see the point. Maybe I missed the obvious. I am known to do that :-) C. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
On Saturday 07 April 2007 07:24, Clayton wrote:
Well with Beagle, I can see it being useful if you (meaning an average end user) are not organized and don't know where things are. For the most part I simply don't have a use for Beagle. I know where all my data is. It's all sorted into logical (for me) locations., and I can find it when I need to just by opening the right directory.
I have yet to see a real use for Beagle... I'm sure it's there or it wouldn't be a part of the GUI desktop... but at least in my case, I have yet to actually see a practical use for it.
I did have it installed for a while, and tinkered with it.. configured it... didn't have any issues with it... removed it because I didn't see the point.
Maybe I missed the obvious. I am known to do that :-)
Under my data is also mailbox, visited web sites, my archive few years old, not in focus and not maintained. I know where is current project, recent mail, few web pages that are bookmarked, but there is a lot more that is not in focus and I don't want to waste time sorting it out. That is where I find Beagle usefull. -- Regards, Rajko. http://en.opensuse.org/Portal -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
On Saturday 07 April 2007 06:10:14 am Rajko M. wrote:
On Saturday 07 April 2007 07:24, Clayton wrote:
Well with Beagle, I can see it being useful if you (meaning an average end user) are not organized and don't know where things are. For the most part I simply don't have a use for Beagle. I know where all my data is. It's all sorted into logical (for me) locations., and I can find it when I need to just by opening the right directory.
I have yet to see a real use for Beagle... I'm sure it's there or it wouldn't be a part of the GUI desktop... but at least in my case, I have yet to actually see a practical use for it.
I did have it installed for a while, and tinkered with it.. configured it... didn't have any issues with it... removed it because I didn't see the point.
Maybe I missed the obvious. I am known to do that :-)
Under my data is also mailbox, visited web sites, my archive few years old, not in focus and not maintained.
Beagle stores visited web sites? Even if the Firefox/Opera/IE/Seamonkey cache is deleted? Coolness! -- kai Free Compean and Ramos http://www.grassfire.org/142/petition.asp http://www.perfectreign.com/?q=node/46 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
On Saturday 07 April 2007 09:06, Kai Ponte wrote:
Beagle stores visited web sites?
Even if the Firefox/Opera/IE/Seamonkey cache is deleted?
Coolness!
You can see in Kerry Beagle Configuration tab Backends, what is active. I don't see Firefox etc. at all. So that is not indexed. -- Regards, Rajko. http://en.opensuse.org/Portal -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
Hi,
On Saturday 07 April 2007 09:06, Kai Ponte wrote:
Beagle stores visited web sites?
Even if the Firefox/Opera/IE/Seamonkey cache is deleted?
There is a Firefox extension which indexes web pages as you view them.
It's completely separate from Firefox's internal cache.
It's Firefox-specific, so it doesn't work with Opera or Seamonkey.
On 4/7/07, Rajko M.
You can see in Kerry Beagle Configuration tab Backends, what is active. I don't see Firefox etc. at all. So that is not indexed.
Since it's an external program which is doing the indexing, it uses the IndexingService backend. But it's easier to just disable/remove the extension from Firefox if you don't want that info to be indexed. Joe -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
On Saturday 07 April 2007 09:22, Joe Shaw wrote:
Hi,
On Saturday 07 April 2007 09:06, Kai Ponte wrote:
Beagle stores visited web sites?
Even if the Firefox/Opera/IE/Seamonkey cache is deleted?
There is a Firefox extension which indexes web pages as you view them. It's completely separate from Firefox's internal cache.
It's Firefox-specific, so it doesn't work with Opera or Seamonkey.
On 4/7/07, Rajko M.
wrote: You can see in Kerry Beagle Configuration tab Backends, what is active. I don't see Firefox etc. at all. So that is not indexed.
Since it's an external program which is doing the indexing, it uses the IndexingService backend. But it's easier to just disable/remove the extension from Firefox if you don't want that info to be indexed.
Joe
It sits in the corner, waiting for right or left click, and I didn't noticed it. I guess it is the way it should be, nonintrusive. Being present only when you need it. Is there plan to include it in Kerry Beagle, as one central place for configuration? -- Regards, Rajko. http://en.opensuse.org/Portal -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
On Saturday 07 April 2007 07:22:27 am Joe Shaw wrote:
Hi,
On Saturday 07 April 2007 09:06, Kai Ponte wrote:
Beagle stores visited web sites?
Even if the Firefox/Opera/IE/Seamonkey cache is deleted?
There is a Firefox extension which indexes web pages as you view them. It's completely separate from Firefox's internal cache.
It's Firefox-specific, so it doesn't work with Opera or Seamonkey.
I see. I have all browsers set (on all operating systems) to delete the cache and all temporary files on exit. SOP for me. -- k -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The Saturday 2007-04-07 at 07:06 -0700, Kai Ponte wrote:
Under my data is also mailbox, visited web sites, my archive few years old, not in focus and not maintained.
Beagle stores visited web sites?
Even if the Firefox/Opera/IE/Seamonkey cache is deleted?
Coolness!
Do you see a little doggy icon on the bottom right corner of firefox? clicking on it enables/disables beagle. - -- Cheers, Carlos E. R. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76 iD8DBQFGF65UtTMYHG2NR9URAkkNAJ931Z263RBPGtYEhdzcOLovoO6VfwCeJE2k to5HtfHKETfz/iG7+nzoBWg= =DMl5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
Well......................except for Hal and
Never had a complaint about Hal. It just works for me. I do not need fixed mount points for automounted devices. I have never had it fail on me. I can't access my external floppy, zip drive or hard drive. All USB. Mount fails with some stupid error. Mounting these drives worked wonderful until Hal came along. Bug report filed but no joy yet.
Stupid.............er.............uh..........I mean Smart.
Well.. Stupid/Smart isn't technically "part" of the default distro. I agree it's an annoying app - SmartGUI that is - compared to more intuitive and informative apps like Synaptic. I've been told by "those in the know" that the SmartGUI is undergoing a major overhaul, and the new interface should be more user friendly and less of an out of touch developer's idea of what is good. Fingers crossed. I was referring to Smart Package Handler, or whatever the heck it is. Yast is far superior.
and don't forget that stupid dog thingy.
Not installed... so no problem. :-) It does work in 10.2 though (in mine at least). I did have it running for a while, and when I did use it, it worked. I don't need it... I know where all my personal files are, so removed it as a redundant app When I tried to leave it out this last time it gave me so many dependency conflicts I just let it install. Nothing important, just
Clayton wrote: things like anything to do with KDE, or the OS. I could have tried just ignoring it but.......................................
AND, can someone explain in SIMPLE English just what the h-e-double hockey sticks Aparmor is supposed to do. Near as I can tell all it does is take up space on my hard drive.
Curtis Rey had a good comment on AppArmor a few months ago (3 January):
"If you're running AppArmor - Don't! It can interfere with apps and /dev access - it's designed for Enterprise/network servers with access to the outside world - generally overkill for home users and non-servers."
As for the Zen thing. Well, I find it quite useful, as long as you don't install the "updater" portion. If you don't install Zen Updater openSuSE Updater gets installed by default.
I noticed the openSUSE updater thing when I hunted down and killed Zen. I also stopped the openSUSE updater. I use Smart on a regular basis and my apps are all on the rather gory bleeding edge.
openSuSE Updater works great. Stupid, well............When I have tried it I just get so tired of trying to find anything I gave up. The way it categorizes everything is an exercise in absolute stupidity.
So... 10.2 and problems... I see mainly Zen, Beagle/Kerry and AppArmor that people complain about as simply not working or causing untold levels of havoc on their installs. None of these 3 are critical, and can simply be removed without really being missed.
Some don't like Hal for various reasons, but it seems to be rare that it's actually Hal that's broken.... more like personal choice where the user doesn't like how Hal handles mount points.
Dunno... still seems to me that 10.2 is a pretty dang good release (after the post release patches are applied) :-) The core of it works very well. Like all software, it will never be perfect... but, as long as future releases work as good as or better than 10.2 I'm a happy camper. I have recommended 10.2 to a whole lot of people... first time users.. and they are getting on very well with it.
C.
My 'ol Granpappy used to say if it ain't broke don't fix it. IMHO, Hal is an attempt to fix something that never was broke in the first place. Smart needs to have the K.I.S.S. Principle applied to it. Beagle, well it doesn't bother me like many others report. Just sort of sits there in the system tray or the bottom corner of Firefox, or whatever, and does nothing. If Beagle does a faster search than the built in "find" it might be well worth it. Just never tried it. Aparmor, about the same as Beagle. Just sort of sits there doing nothing. Zen, as I said before. Some parts of it work a treat. Just leave out the updater portion. It lets me install things that Yast won't/can't, like Gramps that isn't on any of the suse sites. Like from my local Download directory. - - (o:]>*HUGGLES*<[:o) Billie Walsh The three best words in the English Language: "I LOVE YOU" Pass them on! -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
Never had a complaint about Hal. It just works for me. I do not need fixed mount points for automounted devices. I have never had it fail on me. I can't access my external floppy, zip drive or hard drive. All USB. Mount fails with some stupid error. Mounting these drives worked wonderful until Hal came along. Bug report filed but no joy yet.
I've seen only one or two people grumble about this on the forums and mailing lists. my experience across multiple machines and installs is that Hal works perfectly every time :-P with all external devices... iPod, USB floppy, my Sony Ericsson phone, USB DVD burner, USB memory card reader, USB hard drive... basically everything I plug into my USB ports works first try. I don't have to think about mount points or futzing about in /etc/fstab... a good thing for someone as terminally lazy as I am :-) If they get around to fixing your problems, I hope they don't break Hal for me :-) What bug number is it? I'm kinda curious to take a look at what the issue is... not taht I can fix it or anything, but.. you know.. interested in what the problem is.
I was referring to Smart Package Handler, or whatever the heck it is. Yast is far superior.
I think we are talking about the same app. C -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
Clayton wrote:
What bug number is it? I'm kinda curious to take a look at what the issue is... not taht I can fix it or anything, but.. you know.. interested in what the problem is.
I've spent the past thirty minutes looking around the Novel site trying to find the bugs. Finally decided it was hopeless. I don't recall the bug number off hand. I "thought" it was connected to my ID, but I guess that's not the case. Anyway, whenever I try to mount any of the devices I get this message: "Method "Mount" with signature "ssas" on interface "org.freedesktop.Hal.Device.Volume" doesn't exist" - - (o:]>*HUGGLES*<[:o) Billie Walsh The three best words in the English Language: "I LOVE YOU" Pass them on! -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 08:27:34AM +0200, Clayton wrote:
AND, can someone explain in SIMPLE English just what the h-e-double hockey sticks Aparmor is supposed to do. Near as I can tell all it does is take up space on my hard drive.
Curtis Rey had a good comment on AppArmor a few months ago (3 January):
"If you're running AppArmor - Don't! It can interfere with apps and /dev access - it's designed for Enterprise/network servers with access to the outside world - generally overkill for home users and non-servers."
Pity Curtis doesn't actually know what AppArmor does. :) (Or, at least, he didn't know in January..) AppArmor does not control access to files. AppArmor confines programs. AppArmor allows you to list exactly which files you want Apache or Firefox or GAIM or irssi or postfix .. to have access to. AppArmor lets you say that your firefox can't read your ~/.ssh/* files. AppArmor lets you say that the master Apache process (which runs as root) can't write to /etc/shadow. An AppArmor profile for an application is simply a list of the files and access modes a program is allowed, as well as which specific capabilities you're allowing the program to use. If the file isn't in the list, the program doesn't get to use the file. I could just paste you a profile, but the best way to learn about something is by trying it for yourself. If you can spare ten minutes, you can significantly improve the security of your systems: To get started, type "aa-genprof firefox" from one terminal (or use our YaST-equavilent, something like "New profile wizard"), start firefox, browse around a little, quit firefox, and then hit the "scan for events" button. Answer questions. (When starting out something like this, just hit the "inherit this profile" button when prompted for "profile, inherit, or unconfine?".) Then vi /etc/apparmor.d/*firefox* and _see_ what exactly AppArmor does. If you would like to undo whatever it is you've done, delete the relevant files in /etc/apparmor.d/ and run /etc/init.d/boot.apparmor restart. (We do provide an 'rcapparmor' symlink as usual on SuSE, so feel free to save yourself some typing. :) Hope this helps you, and others, get the most out of your computers.
On Friday 06 April 2007 12:43, Anders Johansson wrote:
On Friday 06 April 2007 20:39:21 M Harris wrote:
so, I'm still waiting.
For what?
Perfection and / or Godot, whichever arrives first... RRS -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The Friday 2007-04-06 at 13:39 -0500, M Harris wrote:
It looks like 10.2 for the most part is ok... but if you monitor the bugzilla list opensuse-bugs@opensuse.org you will notice tons of them... so, I'm still waiting.
That only means that we participate and report more easily (and many of them are minor things). - -- Cheers, Carlos E. R. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76 iD8DBQFGFrDwtTMYHG2NR9URAjVqAJ0ac2HbKn7VOHtcWSUACuc9KcPwswCfVMCg 4qSS0q2FCS+xk/qZ41BREGs= =QRS4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
On Friday 06 April 2007 21:22:19 Tim Donnelly wrote:
Well, since this is only the 6th of April I guess I shouldn't be to insulted.
In what way was 10.1 hosed? I have several boxes running on the x86_64 version and they seem to be doing just fine. Is there cause for concern?
He's referring to the update system. As far as I know, even "M" doesn't think there is anything wrong with the rest of it -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
On Friday 06 April 2007 15:22, Tim Donnelly wrote:
In what way was 10.1 hosed?
The only thing hosed was the update procedure which they changed.... and it was broken. And they eventually provided fixes. Once you got by that, it was an ok release. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
participants (12)
-
Anders Johansson
-
Billie Erin Walsh
-
Bruce Marshall
-
Carlos E. R.
-
Clayton
-
Joe Shaw
-
Kai Ponte
-
M Harris
-
Rajko M.
-
Randall R Schulz
-
Seth Arnold
-
Tim Donnelly