[opensuse] Conspiracy theory [not MS...]
Just about when 10.1 was released a thought came to me that I wanted to share: Why was 10.1 delayed? Not because the package management system was not working ('just another bug'), but more importantly, that the next release (+6 months from then) would fall onto Christmas [expl. see below]. Previously - i.e. if the regular schedule was kept * 2005-10-06 10.0 Final (wiki) * +6.5 months 2006-03-25 10.1 Final (math) * +6 months 2006-10-xx 10.2 Final (math) Note that OpenBSD would have been released right after it, 2006-11-01. Currently - how it really turned out: * 2006-05-11 10.1 Final * +6 months 2006-12-07 10.2 Final (math) Now, vendors have some time to preinstall it onto machines and have them sold by Christmas with a _new shiny_ 10.2 rather than a 2.5 month old version. Beats both OpenBSD 4 (1.5 months old) and Vista (not to be released until after xmas). Intersting marketing idea. Conspiracy Ferpecto! :-) -`J' -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
On Sunday 12 November 2006 13:21, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
Just about when 10.1 was released a thought came to me that I wanted to share: Why was 10.1 delayed? Not because the package management system was not working ('just another bug'),
Your theory fails becauseyou start wrong assumptions. Do you consideer package management "just another bug"? When it was changed, basically what broke was: - not able to install the system (not that important yes? :-P ) - not able to install additional software (also true for yast modules which do so, for example http server module installs apache if it was not installed) - Not able to update your system for fixes So, if you consideer this "Just another bug" and then elaborate a very creative theory from it, you started really wrong and you should reconsideer what package management means. Duncan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
* Duncan Mac-Vicar
Your theory fails becauseyou start wrong assumptions.
Isn't the time table also inaccurate? Isn't the present schedule based loosely on _eight_ months? -- Patrick Shanahan Registered Linux User #207535 http://wahoo.no-ip.org @ http://counter.li.org HOG # US1244711 Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
On Sun, 2006-11-12 at 12:17 -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* Duncan Mac-Vicar
[11-12-06 11:57]: ... Your theory fails becauseyou start wrong assumptions.
Isn't the time table also inaccurate? Isn't the present schedule based loosely on _eight_ months?
The time frame has been increased, I think, to 8-9 months instead of 6. -- Ken Schneider UNIX since 1989, linux since 1994, SuSE since 1998 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
On 2006-11-12 10:55, Duncan Mac-Vicar wrote:
On Sunday 12 November 2006 13:21, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
Just about when 10.1 was released a thought came to me that I wanted to share: Why was 10.1 delayed? Not because the package management system was not working ('just another bug'),
Your theory fails becauseyou start wrong assumptions.
Do you consideer package management "just another bug"? When it was changed, basically what broke was: Clearly, though, release was not delayed so the bug could be fixed, so your counter-argument fails ;-)
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
On 2006-11-12 06:21, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
Just about when 10.1 was released a thought came to me that I wanted to share: Why was 10.1 delayed? Not because the package management system
Jan, you have entirely too much spare time on your hands :-) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 12 November 2006 13:18, Darryl Gregorash wrote:
Jan, you have entirely too much spare time on your hands :-)
lol,.........i agree did you ever think that it was delayed because....... it was JUST a delay, and there was no alterior motive? lol your reading too much into it. 1:29pm up 2 days 11:16, 1 user, load average: 0.23, 0.23, 0.32 Powered by: SuSE Linux 10.1 ~ Kernel 2.6.16.21-0.25-smp #1 ~ Kmail 1.9 ~ Registered Linux user: 412217 http://reillyblog.com http://norwichlinuxusersgroup.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFV2igUomsJZB8WEYRAi1KAJ9ObKBewVYLJeprXeij3Dg74P4h8QCZAW60 u0irsTsV08QIY8+j43jOdWg= =Pzog -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
participants (6)
-
Darryl Gregorash
-
Duncan Mac-Vicar
-
Jan Engelhardt
-
Kenneth Schneider
-
Patrick Shanahan
-
steve reilly