[Fwd: Re: [SLE] KDE & Gnome - common desktop]
Damn reply to user rather than list :) I always forget about it... Daniel
Daniel Secareanu wrote:
I am not talking about the applications, but rather about the icons from the desktop... they are duplicated, some KDE icons show up on Gnome desktop and some Gnome icons show up on KDE desktop... Like the two Trash-es... on Gnome desktop both show up... which is redundant and useless...
Daniel
On Sun, 2004-05-09 at 15:53, Sid Boyce wrote:
Daniel Secareanu wrote:
Greetings all...
I have not checked if this subject was discussed already on the list so pls bear with me :) I wonder if any of you have common desktop items in both KDE and Gnome and if there is any way of going around this... I mean I have both trash-es, the KDE links in Gnome and the Start Here link from Gnome in KDE... Maybe SuSE should think about creating gDesktop and kDesktop in order to keep these items separated... Thank you.
Daniel
OK, that's the problem, it has never showed up here. You can go into ~/Desktop/ and remove the files you don't wish to see on the desktop, in KDE and there must be a way to do the same in GNOME. Regards Sid.
-- Sid Boyce .... Hamradio G3VBV and keen Flyer Linux Only Shop.
But this is not the issue. I want KDE icons to remain on KDE desktop and Gnome icons on Gnome desktop... :) Deleting them is not a solution... Daniel On Sun, 2004-05-09 at 16:42, Sid Boyce wrote:
Daniel Secareanu wrote:
I am not talking about the applications, but rather about the icons from the desktop... they are duplicated, some KDE icons show up on Gnome desktop and some Gnome icons show up on KDE desktop... Like the two Trash-es... on Gnome desktop both show up... which is redundant and useless...
Daniel
OK, that's the problem, it has never showed up here. You can go into ~/Desktop/ and remove the files you don't wish to see on the desktop, in KDE and there must be a way to do the same in GNOME. Regards Sid.
-- Sid Boyce .... Hamradio G3VBV and keen Flyer Linux Only Shop.
On Sunday 09 May 2004 16.49, Daniel Secareanu wrote:
But this is not the issue. I want KDE icons to remain on KDE desktop and Gnome icons on Gnome desktop... :) Deleting them is not a solution...
Like I said, wait for gnome 2.6 and your problem is solved. Or manually set kde and gnome to use different desktop directories, it's in the control centre somewhere
OK, I see. I just started a second session as a user with gnome instead of kde, I got a message box that said click on "Link to Desktop" icon, drag and drop icons, then delete "Link to Desktop" and save .gnome-desktop. I logged out and in again, all the icons appear except the ones I dragged into .gnome-desktop, the dragged ones are also missing if I use kde. Needs investigating further. Regards Sid. Daniel Secareanu wrote:
But this is not the issue. I want KDE icons to remain on KDE desktop and Gnome icons on Gnome desktop... :) Deleting them is not a solution...
Daniel
On Sun, 2004-05-09 at 16:42, Sid Boyce wrote:
Daniel Secareanu wrote:
I am not talking about the applications, but rather about the icons from the desktop... they are duplicated, some KDE icons show up on Gnome desktop and some Gnome icons show up on KDE desktop... Like the two Trash-es... on Gnome desktop both show up... which is redundant and useless...
Daniel
OK, that's the problem, it has never showed up here. You can go into ~/Desktop/ and remove the files you don't wish to see on the desktop, in KDE and there must be a way to do the same in GNOME. Regards Sid.
-- Sid Boyce .... Hamradio G3VBV and keen Flyer Linux Only Shop.
-- Sid Boyce .... Hamradio G3VBV and keen Flyer Linux Only Shop.
Damn reply to user rather than list :) I always forget about it...
Daniel Ditto for me and many other people too. If only the list admin would wake up, smell the coffee, and change the Reply to: email address to the
Daniel Secareanu wrote: list address. Unfortunately for us he/she is of the opinion that all lists are this way, which is incorrect and I can prove it with the 20+ email lists I subscribe to. So we are stuck here as we were in the Redmond quagmire. Regards Hylton -- ======================================================================== Hylton Conacher - Licenced Windows user Registered Linux user # 229959 at http://counter.li.org Currently using SuSE 9.0 Professional with KDE 3.1 ========================================================================
On Sunday 09 May 2004 02:05 pm, Hylton Conacher (ZR1HPC) wrote:
Daniel Secareanu wrote:
Damn reply to user rather than list :) I always forget about it...
Daniel
Ditto for me and many other people too. If only the list admin would wake up, smell the coffee, and change the Reply to: email address to the list address.
This has been bandied about for a long time and it's not going to change. There are good reasons to not mangle with the headers. If you're running procmail the solution is easy. If not, there must be at least 5 other ways to make it work to your liking. In other words, it's up to you to solve your problem.
Unfortunately for us he/she is of the opinion that all lists are this way, which is incorrect and I can prove it with the 20+ email lists I subscribe to.
So we are stuck here as we were in the Redmond quagmire.
Regards Hylton -- ======================================================================== Hylton Conacher - Licenced Windows user Registered Linux user # 229959 at http://counter.li.org Currently using SuSE 9.0 Professional with KDE 3.1 ========================================================================
-- +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ + Bruce S. Marshall bmarsh@bmarsh.com Bellaire, MI 05/10/04 14:39 + +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ "A woman is only a woman, but a good cigar is a smoke." - Rudyard Kipling
* Hylton Conacher (ZR1HPC)
Damn reply to user rather than list :) I always forget about it...
Daniel Ditto for me and many other people too. If only the list admin would wake up, smell the coffee, and change the Reply to: email address to the
Daniel Secareanu wrote: list address.
Unfortunately for us he/she is of the opinion that all lists are this way, which is incorrect and I can prove it with the 20+ email lists I subscribe to.
So we are stuck here as we were in the Redmond quagmire.
It's good that your opinions are your own. The Subject of *this* post, not the msg Subject, has been discussed many times and the answer exists in the past/archives. You are making *false* statements. *You* do not know what you are talking about. Why do you use a hammer on the generosity of SuSE and their volunteer, unpaid participants? -- Patrick Shanahan Registered Linux User #207535 http://wahoo.no-ip.org @ http://counter.li.org HOG # US1244711
The Sunday 2004-05-09 at 20:05 +0200, Hylton Conacher (ZR1HPC) wrote:
Ditto for me and many other people too. If only the list admin would wake up, smell the coffee, and change the Reply to: email address to the list address.
FAQ: Q2. Why do my replies go to the original poster and not the list? A2. We do not "munge" the mail headers by inserting a "Reply-To: suse-linux-e@suse.com" because it makes it more difficult subscribers to handle the mail the way they want to. Your mail client probably has a "reply" function as well as a "reply to all" or "reply to list" one; Please use the latter if you want you message to go to the list and not just to the original poster. Also, please don't complain about this on the list, it has been discussed many, many, many times in the past already. For background information see http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html New! Even Sourceforge has turned to the dark side: http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=6693&group_id=1 -- Cheers, Carlos Robinson
In evolution its easy just select reply to list vs reply to sender.
CWSIV
On Mon, 10 May 2004 14:40:28 -0400 Bruce Marshall
Daniel Secareanu wrote:
Damn reply to user rather than list :) I always forget about it...
Daniel
Ditto for me and many other people too. If only the list admin would wake up, smell the coffee, and change the Reply to: email address to
On Sunday 09 May 2004 02:05 pm, Hylton Conacher (ZR1HPC) wrote: the
list address.
This has been bandied about for a long time and it's not going to change. There are good reasons to not mangle with the headers.
If you're running procmail the solution is easy. If not, there must be at least 5 other ways to make it work to your liking.
________________________________________________________________ The best thing to hit the Internet in years - Juno SpeedBand! Surf the Web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER! Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!
participants (8)
-
Anders Johansson
-
Bruce Marshall
-
Carl William Spitzer IV
-
Carlos E. R.
-
Daniel Secareanu
-
Hylton Conacher (ZR1HPC)
-
Patrick Shanahan
-
Sid Boyce