After doing an online update on my 9.2 system, on one user only, I can not launch any browser or email program. I ran firefox from a terminal and get the following: harry@linux:~> firefox --sync (Gecko:6640): Gdk-CRITICAL **: file gdkdraw.c: line 204 (gdk_drawable_get_depth): assertion `GDK_IS_DRAWABLE (drawable)' failed (Gecko:6640): Gdk-CRITICAL **: file gdkwindow-x11.c: line 2510 (gdk_window_set_back_pixmap): assertion `pixmap == NULL || gdk_drawable_get_depth (window) == gdk_drawable_get_depth (pixmap)' failed (Gecko:6640): Gdk-CRITICAL **: file gdkdraw.c: line 204 (gdk_drawable_get_depth): assertion `GDK_IS_DRAWABLE (drawable)' failed (Gecko:6640): Gdk-CRITICAL **: file gdkwindow-x11.c: line 2510 (gdk_window_set_back_pixmap): assertion `pixmap == NULL || gdk_drawable_get_depth (window) == gdk_drawable_get_depth (pixmap)' failed (Gecko:6640): Gdk-CRITICAL **: file gdkdraw.c: line 204 (gdk_drawable_get_depth): assertion `GDK_IS_DRAWABLE (drawable)' failed (Gecko:6640): Gdk-CRITICAL **: file gdkwindow-x11.c: line 2510 (gdk_window_set_back_pixmap): assertion `pixmap == NULL || gdk_drawable_get_depth (window) == gdk_drawable_get_depth (pixmap)' failed (Gecko:6640): Gdk-CRITICAL **: file gdkdraw.c: line 204 (gdk_drawable_get_depth): assertion `GDK_IS_DRAWABLE (drawable)' failed (Gecko:6640): Gdk-CRITICAL **: file gdkwindow-x11.c: line 2510 (gdk_window_set_back_pixmap): assertion `pixmap == NULL || gdk_drawable_get_depth (window) == gdk_drawable_get_depth (pixmap)' failed (Gecko:6640): Gdk-CRITICAL **: file gdkdraw.c: line 204 (gdk_drawable_get_depth): assertion `GDK_IS_DRAWABLE (drawable)' failed (Gecko:6640): Gdk-CRITICAL **: file gdkwindow-x11.c: line 2510 (gdk_window_set_back_pixmap): assertion `pixmap == NULL || gdk_drawable_get_depth (window) == gdk_drawable_get_depth (pixmap)' failed *** loading the extensions datasource The program 'Gecko' received an X Window System error. This probably reflects a bug in the program. The error was 'BadPixmap (invalid Pixmap parameter)'. (Details: serial 3328 error_code 4 request_code 55 minor_code 0) (Note to programmers: normally, X errors are reported asynchronously; that is, you will receive the error a while after causing it. To debug your program, run it with the --sync command line option to change this behavior. You can then get a meaningful backtrace from your debugger if you break on the gdk_x_error() function.) I am not sure what this means, and why only one user seems to be affected. Any ideas? Harry G
On Sat, April 23, 2005 13:55, Harry Giles said:
After doing an online update on my 9.2 system, on one user only, I can not launch any browser or email program. I ran firefox from a terminal and get the following:
I thought I was going nuts. I see the same thing with mozilla based programs - thunderbird, firefox and nvu. I have the output of strace ./thunderbird here: http://www.alink.co.za/typescript.txt I suspect I also upgraded my machine in the last few days, although I can't be specific about what (I can't see an option for rpm to list by date the package was installed?) Cheers, -- George Barnett, Scsa Reality Engineer & Explorer eml: george@alink.co.za gsm: +44 778 884 7205 www: www.alink.co.za Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
On Sat, 2005-04-23 at 14:18 +0100, George Barnett wrote:
On Sat, April 23, 2005 13:55, Harry Giles said:
After doing an online update on my 9.2 system, on one user only, I can not launch any browser or email program. I ran firefox from a terminal and get the following:
I thought I was going nuts. I see the same thing with mozilla based programs - thunderbird, firefox and nvu.
I have the output of strace ./thunderbird here:
http://www.alink.co.za/typescript.txt
I suspect I also upgraded my machine in the last few days, although I can't be specific about what (I can't see an option for rpm to list by date the package was installed?)
rpm -qa --queryformat '%{INSTALLTIME}\t%{INSTALLTIME:date}\t%{NAME}\n' | sort -g | cut -f 2- all on one line of course. This will show the newest at the end of the list. -- Ken Schneider UNIX since 1989, linux since 1994, SuSE since 1998 "The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck is probably the day they start making vacuum cleaners." -Ernst Jan Plugge
On Sat, April 23, 2005 14:24, Ken Schneider said:
rpm -qa --queryformat '%{INSTALLTIME}\t%{INSTALLTIME:date}\t%{NAME}\n' | sort -g | cut -f 2-
sneaky. I had a look and it seems I had done this: Fri 22 Apr 2005 09:25:40 BST gtk-qt-engine It was at version 0.6cvs something or other. I've downgrade this to gtk-qt-engine-0.5-9.3 and life has returned to normal. Cheers, George -- George Barnett, Scsa Reality Engineer & Explorer eml: george@alink.co.za gsm: +44 778 884 7205 www: www.alink.co.za Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
On Saturday 23 April 2005 09:51, George Barnett wrote:
On Sat, April 23, 2005 14:24, Ken Schneider said:
rpm -qa --queryformat '%{INSTALLTIME}\t%{INSTALLTIME:date}\t%{NAME}\n' | sort -g | cut -f 2-
sneaky.
I had a look and it seems I had done this:
Fri 22 Apr 2005 09:25:40 BST gtk-qt-engine
It was at version 0.6cvs something or other.
I've downgrade this to gtk-qt-engine-0.5-9.3 and life has returned to normal.
What is the best way to downgrade? Can it be done via Yast, or should I download the rpm? Harry G
Harry Giles wrote:
What is the best way to downgrade? Can it be done via Yast, or should I download the rpm?
I did it in Yast. Go to install/remove software and do a search for gtk. Look for gtk-qt-engine and see what version is available and what's installed. It was in highlighted in red on my system. I right clicked on the package and chose 'Upgrade'. Accept that and it should be ok. The SuSE watcher tool just tried to upgrade that component again though - I had to tell it not too :( Cheers, George -- George Barnett Reality Engineer m: (+44) 778 884 7205 e: george@alink.co.za If a group of _N persons implements a COBOL compiler, there will be _N-1 passes. Someone in the group has to be the manager. -- T. Cheatham
On Saturday 23 April 2005 09:51, George Barnett wrote:
On Sat, April 23, 2005 14:24, Ken Schneider said:
rpm -qa --queryformat '%{INSTALLTIME}\t%{INSTALLTIME:date}\t%{NAME}\n' | sort -g | cut -f 2-
sneaky.
I had a look and it seems I had done this:
Fri 22 Apr 2005 09:25:40 BST gtk-qt-engine
It was at version 0.6cvs something or other.
I've downgrade this to gtk-qt-engine-0.5-9.3 and life has returned to normal.
What is the best way to downgrade? Can it be done via Yast, or should I download the rpm? Harry G
Op zaterdag 23 april 2005 15:24, schreef Ken Schneider:
rpm -qa --queryformat '%{INSTALLTIME}\t%{INSTALLTIME:date}\t%{NAME}\n' | sort -g | cut -f 2-
rpm -qa --last | head , for the lazy ones ;) -- Richard Bos Without a home the journey is endless
participants (4)
-
George Barnett -
Harry Giles -
Ken Schneider -
Richard Bos