I meant to offer some Gmail invites to the group to those interested. I have six or seven available. Just shoot me an email.
FYI, since I first posted Gmail has given me a bunch more invites.
Send an email if you want one.
Gary
On Fri, 03 Sep 2004 21:33:32 -0400, James Knott
Gary Hodges wrote:
I meant to offer some Gmail invites to the group to those interested. I have six or seven available. Just shoot me an email.
Why all the excitement about gmail? What's it got that other e-mail accounts don't?
-- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
Gary Hodges wrote:
I meant to offer some Gmail invites to the group to those interested. I have six or seven available. Just shoot me an email.
Why all the excitement about gmail? What's it got that other e-mail accounts don't? Exitement due to: 1. You have to be invited to have an account or have a blogger. 2. Being able to get your name if you sign up quickly enought. Olly --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.747 / Virus Database: 499 - Release Date: 01/09/2004
I still haven't seen it explained *WHY* I would want one. Gary Hodges wrote:
FYI, since I first posted Gmail has given me a bunch more invites. Send an email if you want one.
Gary
On Fri, 03 Sep 2004 21:33:32 -0400, James Knott
wrote: Gary Hodges wrote:
I meant to offer some Gmail invites to the group to those interested. I have six or seven available. Just shoot me an email.
Why all the excitement about gmail? What's it got that other e-mail accounts don't?
-- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
olusola Fadero wrote:
Gary Hodges wrote:
I meant to offer some Gmail invites to the group to those interested. I have six or seven available. Just shoot me an email.
Why all the excitement about gmail? What's it got that other e-mail accounts don't?
Exitement due to: 1. You have to be invited to have an account or have a blogger. 2. Being able to get your name if you sign up quickly enought.
Woop Dee Doo!!! I guess I have better ways to waste my time.
On Saturday 04 September 2004 14:11, James Knott wrote:
olusola Fadero wrote:
Gary Hodges wrote:
I meant to offer some Gmail invites to the group to those interested. I have six or seven available. Just shoot me an email.
Why all the excitement about gmail? What's it got that other e-mail accounts don't?
Exitement due to: 1. You have to be invited to have an account or have a blogger. 2. Being able to get your name if you sign up quickly enought.
Woop Dee Doo!!!
I guess I have better ways to waste my time.
Actually all of the excitement is do to the 1GB storage limit on free mail accounts, being able to "google search" through he text of your e-mails, and having e-mail correspondences threaded for easy viewing.... The "exclusiveness" of having to be invited doesn't hurt the hype, but isn't what caused it. Steve
On Sat, 04 Sep 2004 08:11:19 -0400, James Knott
I still haven't seen it explained *WHY* I would want one.
You could sign up with the invite I sent you and decide for yourself. You may find it useful and maybe not. I've always liked the idea of a gmail, yahoo, etc type of account, but never used one before gmail. With one you can change ISPs and not have to worry about changing email addresses. So far I've mostly used mine for fun and just to "check it out." I will say that I've found it particularly useful for high volume mailing lists like this one. The way gmail threads messages turns a high volume list into a manageable resource. I've heard others say gmail is not unique in this sense, but with the 1 GB storage it is pretty good. For others seeking accounts... I just sent off my last invite. I think I gave away around 25 invites here with my offer. Every one who requested one was sent one (and even James who didn't :-)), so hopefully they all have been received. Gmail has been giving me these things faster than I could give them away. If, or more likely when, I get more invites I'll offer them to the SuSE list. Cheers, Gary
Gary Hodges wrote:
FYI, since I first posted Gmail has given me a bunch more invites. Send an email if you want one.
Gary
On Fri, 03 Sep 2004 21:33:32 -0400, James Knott
wrote: Gary Hodges wrote:
I meant to offer some Gmail invites to the group to those interested. I have six or seven available. Just shoot me an email.
Why all the excitement about gmail? What's it got that other e-mail accounts don't?
On Sat, 4 Sep 2004 10:13:53 -0600, Gary Hodges
For others seeking accounts... I just sent off my last invite. I think I gave away around 25 invites here with my offer. Every one who requested one was sent one (and even James who didn't :-)), so hopefully they all have been received. Gmail has been giving me these things faster than I could give them away. If, or more likely when, I get more invites I'll offer them to the SuSE list.
I have some gmail invites if anyone wants one email me privetly. Walt
Hello,
I still haven't seen it explained *WHY* I would want one.
These are the reasons *I love* my gmail account -- 1. 1 GB of storage 2. very nice message threading 3. google search 4. new way of organizing mail. Instead of sorting into folders, you apply 'labels'. You can apply more than one label, so a message can exist in more than one 'folder' at once. 5. nearly 100% keyboard navigatable 6. NON-INTRUSIVE ad's. Yahoo's ads take up like half the screen, and hotmails are always flashy. Gmail are just little text ads on the right, much like a google search. The others also add their own tags to the bottom of your message as well. Gmail does not. 7. very speedy. Sometimes hotmail and yahoo can take forever to send/transmit messages. I have not had the problem with gmail. 8. very nice filtering options. 9. I love google anyway. Hope this is what you were looking for. Also, I have invites for the first 5 people to shoot me an e-mail. I am sure this will all happen today (Saturday Sept 4 Mountain Standard Time), so please don't send me a message after that. I don't want to get volumes of requests I don't have invites for! Gmail Rocks!! Kirk
On Sat, 04 Sep 2004 14:31:48 -0400, James Knott
Ti Kan wrote:
James Knott writes:
Why all the excitement about gmail? What's it got that other e-mail accounts don't?
1GB of free storage.
I've already got 2 GB per ID ( up to 7 IDs )with my current ISP.
I don't think this was the point of the gentleman's offer. He was just being nice and offering invites to a service that he thought people might like to play with. I've never seen such argumentative responses to some making a free offer of something that is useful. I send all the email from the various SUSE lists and other such things to my gmail account. If others don't want to do it.. that's cool. It's not a question of how much space or how many ids or whatever. I mean my personal account is housed on a server I have root on and that has no limit to space I can use or ids *I* could create. :) But I still direct my mailing list email to this account .. if I don't want to look at it for a couple days.. that's cool. And I can archive it all and search it as I would anything else on Google. *shrug* -ben -- "There is no need to teach that stars can fall out of the sky and land on a flat Earth in order to defend religious faith."
Ben Rosenberg wrote:
On Sat, 04 Sep 2004 14:31:48 -0400, James Knott
wrote: Ti Kan wrote:
James Knott writes:
Why all the excitement about gmail? What's it got that other e-mail accounts don't?
1GB of free storage.
I've already got 2 GB per ID ( up to 7 IDs )with my current ISP.
I don't think this was the point of the gentleman's offer. He was just being nice and offering invites to a service that he thought people might like to play with. I've never seen such argumentative responses to some making a free offer of something that is useful.
I don't have a problem with him offering it. I just don't see what all the excitement is about.
On Saturday 04 September 2004 10:31 am, James Knott wrote:
Ti Kan wrote:
James Knott writes:
Why all the excitement about gmail? What's it got that other e-mail accounts don't?
1GB of free storage.
I've already got 2 GB per ID ( up to 7 IDs )with my current ISP.
I've already got 110 Gig - I run Linux. I thought thats what this list is about!!?? gmail is cool, I even have an acccount, but don't use it. Because I run linux I can get my mail and send my mail from anywhere. -- _____________________________________ John Andersen
John Andersen writes:
I've already got 110 Gig - I run Linux. I thought thats what this list is about!!??
Yes, of course. Same here too. But it is always good to have a secondary email account that doesn't live on your own machine, where you don't care if it gets spammed. In the occasions where you have to give my email address to a business while signing up for a service, or somesuch, you can use the secondary email address. Gmail just happens to be quite good because it offers such a large amount of free storage space. Anyway, this is OT and I won't add any more to this thread. -Ti
John Andersen wrote:
I've already got 110 Gig - I run Linux. I thought thats what this list is about!!??
Well, I've got 120, so there!!! ;-) Incidentally, it wasn't all that long ago, that a friend was bragging he had 1 GB in his computer. As I recall, it took him 4 drives to do it. My first hard drive was all of 30 MB, and I used to back it up to floppies!. I didn't run Linux on that computer though. ;-)
On Saturday 04 Sep 2004 22:26, James Knott wrote:
John Andersen wrote:
I've already got 110 Gig - I run Linux. I thought thats what this list is about!!??
Well, I've got 120, so there!!! ;-)
Incidentally, it wasn't all that long ago, that a friend was bragging he had 1 GB in his computer. As I recall, it took him 4 drives to do it. My first hard drive was all of 30 MB, and I used to back it up to floppies!. I didn't run Linux on that computer though. ;-)
Hummmmm i see you started with one of the BIG drives at 30Mb My first Hdd was a huge great 10Mb 5.25" full height thing that needed an connection onto the National Grid to power it never ran out of space thou Pete. -- Linux user No: 256242 Machine No: 139931 G6NJR Pete also MSA registered "Quinton 11" A Linux Only area Happy bug hunting M$ clan PGN
peter Nikolic wrote:
On Saturday 04 Sep 2004 22:26, James Knott wrote:
John Andersen wrote:
I've already got 110 Gig - I run Linux. I thought thats what this list is about!!??
Well, I've got 120, so there!!! ;-)
Incidentally, it wasn't all that long ago, that a friend was bragging he had 1 GB in his computer. As I recall, it took him 4 drives to do it. My first hard drive was all of 30 MB, and I used to back it up to floppies!. I didn't run Linux on that computer though. ;-)
Hummmmm i see you started with one of the BIG drives at 30Mb My first Hdd was a huge great 10Mb 5.25" full height thing that needed an connection onto the National Grid to power it never ran out of space thou
Mine was a Seagate 235R, IIRC, the RLL version of the MFM 225. It was a 1/2 hight 5.25" drive. The drive and controller cost me $500! Lots of space on it too. My next drive was 120 MB, which I ran OS/2 on.
On Sat, 4 Sep 2004 22:48:33 +0100 peter Nikolic
Hummmmm i see you started with one of the BIG drives at 30Mb My first Hdd was a huge great 10Mb 5.25" full height thing that needed an connection onto the National Grid to power it never ran out of space thou
This brought back memories- my first HD was a WD "Hard Card" which slotted into my 8086 Ferranti PC. As it was 20Mb though I had to dual partition it as MS-DOS couldn't deal with more than, IIRC, 10Mb. I never had a problem with it though, unlike much later WD drive.... Terence
I wonder. How many hip replacements have you had? On Saturday 04 September 2004 17:48, peter Nikolic wrote:
On Saturday 04 Sep 2004 22:26, James Knott wrote:
John Andersen wrote:
I've already got 110 Gig - I run Linux. I thought thats what this list is about!!??
Well, I've got 120, so there!!! ;-)
Incidentally, it wasn't all that long ago, that a friend was bragging he had 1 GB in his computer. As I recall, it took him 4 drives to do it. My first hard drive was all of 30 MB, and I used to back it up to floppies!. I didn't run Linux on that computer though. ;-)
Hummmmm i see you started with one of the BIG drives at 30Mb My first Hdd was a huge great 10Mb 5.25" full height thing that needed an connection onto the National Grid to power it never ran out of space thou
Pete.
-- Linux user No: 256242 Machine No: 139931 G6NJR Pete also MSA registered "Quinton 11" A Linux Only area Happy bug hunting M$ clan PGN
On Saturday 04 Sep 2004 23:12, Allen wrote:
I wonder. How many hip replacements have you had?
On Saturday 04 September 2004 17:48, peter Nikolic wrote:
On Saturday 04 Sep 2004 22:26, James Knott wrote:
John Andersen wrote:
I've already got 110 Gig - I run Linux. I thought thats what this list is about!!??
Well, I've got 120, so there!!! ;-)
Incidentally, it wasn't all that long ago, that a friend was bragging he had 1 GB in his computer. As I recall, it took him 4 drives to do it. My first hard drive was all of 30 MB, and I used to back it up to floppies!. I didn't run Linux on that computer though. ;-)
Hummmmm i see you started with one of the BIG drives at 30Mb My first Hdd was a huge great 10Mb 5.25" full height thing that needed an connection onto the National Grid to power it never ran out of space thou
Pete.
-- Linux user No: 256242 Machine No: 139931 G6NJR Pete also MSA registered "Quinton 11" A Linux Only area Happy bug hunting M$ clan PGN
HUmmmm i see well for your info non as yet (could do with a new lumbar spine thou) Pete . -- Linux user No: 256242 Machine No: 139931 G6NJR Pete also MSA registered "Quinton 11" A Linux Only area Happy bug hunting M$ clan PGN
Freemail spymac.com has free 1GB capacity too. Without invites and with POP3. No limit for size of sended/received emails. Dne sobota 04 září 2004 03:33 James Knott napsal(a):
Gary Hodges wrote:
I meant to offer some Gmail invites to the group to those interested. I have six or seven available. Just shoot me an email.
Why all the excitement about gmail? What's it got that other e-mail accounts don't?
--
Marek Libra
____________________
+420777039948
On Saturday 04 Sep 2004 22:26, James Knott wrote: Hummmmm i see you started with one of the BIG drives at 30Mb My first Hdd was a huge great 10Mb 5.25" full height thing that needed an
Lucky you - mine had two 160k floppy drives :-) But then I was far behind my friends on computers - only caught up last year when I bought my Athlon. And now I'm behind again..... -- Kind regards Hans du Plooy Newington Consulting Services hansdp at newingtoncs dot co dot za
Hans du Plooy wrote:
On Saturday 04 Sep 2004 22:26, James Knott wrote: Hummmmm i see you started with one of the BIG drives at 30Mb My first Hdd was a huge great 10Mb 5.25" full height thing that needed an
Lucky you - mine had two 160k floppy drives :-) But then I was far behind my friends on computers - only caught up last year when I bought my Athlon. And now I'm behind again.....
You're behind, as soon as you get your computer home! ;-)
On Sat, 4 Sep 2004 10:32:30 -0600 Kirk Coombs
Hello,
I still haven't seen it explained *WHY* I would want one.
These are the reasons *I love* my gmail account --
1. 1 GB of storage 2. very nice message threading 3. google search 4. new way of organizing mail. Instead of sorting into folders, you apply 'labels'. You can apply more than one label, so a message can exist in more than one 'folder' at once. 5. nearly 100% keyboard navigatable 6. NON-INTRUSIVE ad's. Yahoo's ads take up like half the screen, and hotmails are always flashy. Gmail are just little text ads on the right, much like a google search. The others also add their own tags to the bottom of your message as well. Gmail does not. 7. very speedy. Sometimes hotmail and yahoo can take forever to send/transmit messages. I have not had the problem with gmail. 8. very nice filtering options. 9. I love google anyway.
Hope this is what you were looking for. Also, I have invites for the first 5 people to shoot me an e-mail. I am sure this will all happen today (Saturday Sept 4 Mountain Standard Time), so please don't send me a message after that. I don't want to get volumes of requests I don't have invites for!
Well does it handle pop3 and smtp? CWSIV ________________________________________________________________ Get your name as your email address. Includes spam protection, 1GB storage, no ads and more Only $1.99/ month - visit http://www.mysite.com/name today!
By the way the best way to cause the death of a thread is to ignore it. This works better than asking people to go to another list as only the minority of people interested in the subject will reply. Olly NB: Yes, I am on lots of mail groups for various reasons. Yes. I am using windows for various reasons. No I can't be bothered to explain why. -----Original Message----- From: Anders Norrbring [mailto:lists@norrbring.se] Sent: 04 September 2004 17:38 To: 'Walt Frampus'; suse-linux-e@suse.com Subject: RE: [SLE] Gmail Invites
Subject: Re: [SLE] Gmail Invites
I have some gmail invites if anyone wants one email me privetly.
Why not "make the offer" in the OT list? -- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.747 / Virus Database: 499 - Release Date: 01/09/2004 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.747 / Virus Database: 499 - Release Date: 01/09/2004
On Sunday 05 September 2004 03:22 pm, olusola Fadero wrote:
By the way the best way to cause the death of a thread is to ignore it. This works better than asking people to go to another list as only the minority of people interested in the subject will reply.
And you are contributing to this HOW?? -- _____________________________________ John Andersen
Carl, On Sunday 05 September 2004 07:58, Carl William Spitzer IV wrote:
...
Well does it handle pop3 and smtp?
Nope. There is only a Web interface.
From
CWSIV
Randall Schulz
My first computer I bought 4 years ago and it's a Pentium 3 733 MHz with 128 MBs RAM, a CD-RW drive and DVD-ROM drive built in, and I've since added to it making it 384 MBs RAM, and a Sound Blaster Live! card. I pulled out the POS "modem sound card". It has the HD in it that it came with. A 43 GB HD. 43 GBs is odd but the only time it ever says anything but 43 GBs is when it has a Fat32 File System. Then it says 42.9. Anwyay that was my first machine. It's running right now playing Lords of Acid and the rest of my play list (Mostly Punk Rock). Yea, I know, I'm young. On Monday 06 September 2004 10:57, Robert A. Rawlinson wrote:
You must have had double density. My first was one I built. It had 8008 cpu with 2k memory, no floppy or hd just a cassett rrecorder. It had no e prom to start it up so that involved setting 16 address switches and 8 data switches then pressing data enter switch. It took 15 min to load a program that way that would allow me to us the keyboard. Then another 15 min to key in a program in hex that told it how to read the cassett program. A system crash meant you had to go back and do it all over again. The time was 1974. I remember the $5000 5 meg HD which I think was the first out. I remember thinking that no one could ever use that much storage. Boy have things changed. Bob
Hans du Plooy wrote:
On Saturday 04 Sep 2004 22:26, James Knott wrote: Hummmmm i see you started with one of the BIG drives at 30Mb My first Hdd was a huge great 10Mb 5.25" full height thing that needed an
Lucky you - mine had two 160k floppy drives :-) But then I was far behind my friends on computers - only caught up last year when I bought my Athlon. And now I'm behind again.....
You must have had double density. My first was one I built. It had 8008 cpu with 2k memory, no floppy or hd just a cassett rrecorder. It had no e prom to start it up so that involved setting 16 address switches and 8 data switches then pressing data enter switch. It took 15 min to load a program that way that would allow me to us the keyboard. Then another 15 min to key in a program in hex that told it how to read the cassett program. A system crash meant you had to go back and do it all over again. The time was 1974. I remember the $5000 5 meg HD which I think was the first out. I remember thinking that no one could ever use that much storage. Boy have things changed. Bob Hans du Plooy wrote:
On Saturday 04 Sep 2004 22:26, James Knott wrote: Hummmmm i see you started with one of the BIG drives at 30Mb My first Hdd was a huge great 10Mb 5.25" full height thing that needed an
Lucky you - mine had two 160k floppy drives :-) But then I was far behind my friends on computers - only caught up last year when I bought my Athlon. And now I'm behind again.....
Allen wrote:
My first computer I bought 4 years ago and it's a Pentium 3 733 MHz with 128 MBs RAM, a CD-RW drive and DVD-ROM drive built in, and I've since added to it making it 384 MBs RAM, and a Sound Blaster Live! card. I pulled out the POS "modem sound card". It has the HD in it that it came with. A 43 GB HD. 43 GBs is odd but the only time it ever says anything but 43 GBs is when it has a Fat32 File System. Then it says 42.9. Anwyay that was my first machine. It's running right now playing Lords of Acid and the rest of my play list (Mostly Punk Rock). Yea, I know, I'm young.
My first computer was an IMSAI 8080, which I bought in Nov. '76. The basic kit contained no (count it, none) memory and the only inculded I/O was the front panel switches & LEDs. I had to buy memory, I/O board, video, keyboard, cassettes etc., separately. Also, the kit was bags of parts, which had to be assembled into boards etc. Lots of fun and I learned quite a lot!
Robert A. Rawlinson wrote:
You must have had double density. My first was one I built. It had 8008 cpu with 2k memory, no floppy or hd just a cassett rrecorder. It had no e prom to start it up so that involved setting 16 address switches and 8 data switches then pressing data enter switch. It took 15 min to load a program that way that would allow me to us the keyboard. Then another 15 min to key in a program in hex that told it how to read the cassett program. A system crash meant you had to go back and do it all over again. The time was 1974. I remember the $5000 5 meg HD which I think was the first out. I remember thinking that no one could ever use that much storage. Boy have things changed. Bob
My IMSAI cost me about $2000 (CDN) with 4K memory, but no I/O. As an indication of cost, a couple of months earlier, I had purchased a new 1976 Mercury Monarch for $6300. A couple of years ago, I bought a new Ford Taurus for a bit under 30,000, so a comparable computer purchase would be around $9,000. Also the car's performance hasn't improved quite a much as a computer's has in the past 28 years. ;-)
That's because cars now have wussy ass engines instead of V8 engines. The only car I can think of worth getting brand new is a Maclaren F1, and that's only because it will do 0-100 in 4 seconds and maxes out at 391. On Monday 06 September 2004 12:44, James Knott wrote:
Robert A. Rawlinson wrote:
You must have had double density. My first was one I built. It had 8008 cpu with 2k memory, no floppy or hd just a cassett rrecorder. It had no e prom to start it up so that involved setting 16 address switches and 8 data switches then pressing data enter switch. It took 15 min to load a program that way that would allow me to us the keyboard. Then another 15 min to key in a program in hex that told it how to read the cassett program. A system crash meant you had to go back and do it all over again. The time was 1974. I remember the $5000 5 meg HD which I think was the first out. I remember thinking that no one could ever use that much storage. Boy have things changed. Bob
My IMSAI cost me about $2000 (CDN) with 4K memory, but no I/O. As an indication of cost, a couple of months earlier, I had purchased a new 1976 Mercury Monarch for $6300. A couple of years ago, I bought a new Ford Taurus for a bit under 30,000, so a comparable computer purchase would be around $9,000. Also the car's performance hasn't improved quite a much as a computer's has in the past 28 years. ;-)
Allen wrote:
That's because cars now have wussy ass engines instead of V8 engines. The only car I can think of worth getting brand new is a Maclaren F1, and that's only because it will do 0-100 in 4 seconds and maxes out at 391.
The clock speed in that IMSAI was 2 MHz. Today's computers are over 1000x that. So, when that Maclaren can do 0-100 in 4 mS, then we have a valid comparison. Incidentally, both the V8 in the Monarch and the V6 in the Taurus are rated at 150 HP, but the Taurus is the better perfomer and gets better fuel economy.
I'd still take a GTO Judge over a newer car. Pop like a 502 on, and I'd never get pulled over. Cop cars max out at around 150, I could top that. On Monday 06 September 2004 13:39, James Knott wrote:
Allen wrote:
That's because cars now have wussy ass engines instead of V8 engines. The only car I can think of worth getting brand new is a Maclaren F1, and that's only because it will do 0-100 in 4 seconds and maxes out at 391.
The clock speed in that IMSAI was 2 MHz. Today's computers are over 1000x that. So, when that Maclaren can do 0-100 in 4 mS, then we have a valid comparison. Incidentally, both the V8 in the Monarch and the V6 in the Taurus are rated at 150 HP, but the Taurus is the better perfomer and gets better fuel economy.
* James Knott
The clock speed in that IMSAI was 2 MHz. Today's computers are over 1000x that. So, when that Maclaren can do 0-100 in 4 mS, then we have a valid comparison. Incidentally, both the V8 in the Monarch and the V6 in the Taurus are rated at 150 HP, but the Taurus is the better perfomer and gets better fuel economy.
And *this* conversation has *what* to do with the Subject of the thread or the Subject of your message? Please take it to the provided, intended forum ot-suse. Thanks for your expected cooperation and consideration. -- Patrick Shanahan Registered Linux User #207535 http://wahoo.no-ip.org @ http://counter.li.org HOG # US1244711 Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/photos
On Monday 06 September 2004 12:47 pm, Kolja Kauder wrote:
Ti Kan wrote:
James Knott writes:
Why all the excitement about gmail? What's it got that other e-mail accounts don't?
1GB of free storage.
-Ti
plus a virtually immortal provider. Oh, and of course tailor made spam for you ;-)
KK
So far, not one spam email has shown up. They seem to have some spam filtering in place. But of course there are topical ads appearing on each messages detail page, which attempt to relate to the message you are viewing. -- _____________________________________ John Andersen
Like Gmail had a lot to do with SUSE. On Monday 06 September 2004 15:03, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* James Knott
[09-06-04 12:40]: The clock speed in that IMSAI was 2 MHz. Today's computers are over 1000x that. So, when that Maclaren can do 0-100 in 4 mS, then we have a valid comparison. Incidentally, both the V8 in the Monarch and the V6 in the Taurus are rated at 150 HP, but the Taurus is the better perfomer and gets better fuel economy.
And *this* conversation has *what* to do with the Subject of the thread or the Subject of your message?
Please take it to the provided, intended forum ot-suse.
Thanks for your expected cooperation and consideration. -- Patrick Shanahan Registered Linux User #207535 http://wahoo.no-ip.org @ http://counter.li.org HOG # US1244711 Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/photos
On Monday 06 September 2004 16:57, Robert A. Rawlinson wrote:
You must have had double density. My first was one I built. It Well, it was either double density single sided, or normal density double sided, I don't remember. Was 160k either ways.
One thing though, while S.A. was still in isolation, we were WAY behind on PC hardware. My father bought a XT computer, complete with orange screen, no graphics card (had to buy a separate card and load something like "g8sw" to activate graphics mode), two 360k floppy drives and no hard disc, in 1989 for his business. Hard drives were available, but very expensive (even for computer equipment). If I remember correctly, my dad also bought a new Ford Sierra 2.0, which cost less than the computer. 286 might have been available, but obviously way too expensive.... -- Kind regards Hans du Plooy Newington Consulting Services hansdp at newingtoncs dot co dot za
participants (21)
-
Allen
-
Anders Norrbring
-
Ben Rosenberg
-
Carl William Spitzer IV
-
Gary Hodges
-
Hans du Plooy
-
James Knott
-
John Andersen
-
Ken Schneider
-
Kirk Coombs
-
Kolja Kauder
-
Marek Libra
-
olusola Fadero
-
Patrick Shanahan
-
peter Nikolic
-
Randall R Schulz
-
Robert A. Rawlinson
-
Steve Wagoner
-
Terence McCarthy
-
ti@amb.org
-
Walt Frampus