Hi, Does anyone knows if the SuSE fonts were scraped in 10.1 distro. If not, were are they, in which rpm? Regards Lívio Cipriano
On Wed, 2006-08-23 at 11:57 +0100, Lívio Cipriano wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone knows if the SuSE fonts were scraped in 10.1 distro. If not, were are they, in which rpm?
Regards
Lívio Cipriano
Ye I see there gone, I personally dont miss them, Tahoma (yes from MS) is by far the best desktop font (renders nicely non-aliased) Someone else also asked this a while back, check the archive maybe E-Mail disclaimer: http://www.sunspace.co.za/emaildisclaimer.htm
Hi, I agree with about Tahoma, but only for CTR displays, and I'm using a laptop. In the lap I prefer Adobe Helvetica. But I used the SuSE fonts as the basis for my OOffice templates so ... I guess that I have to import them from distro 9.2 Regards Lívio Cipriano ----- Original Message ----- On Wed, 2006-08-23 at 11:57 +0100, Lívio Cipriano wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone knows if the SuSE fonts were scraped in 10.1 distro. If not, were are they, in which rpm?
Regards
Lívio Cipriano
Ye I see there gone, I personally dont miss them, Tahoma (yes from MS) is by far the best desktop font (renders nicely non-aliased) Someone else also asked this a while back, check the archive maybe E-Mail disclaimer: http://www.sunspace.co.za/emaildisclaimer.htm
Hans van der Merwe wrote:
On Wed, 2006-08-23 at 11:57 +0100, LÃvio Cipriano wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone knows if the SuSE fonts were scraped in 10.1 distro. If not, were are they, in which rpm?
Ye I see there gone, I personally dont miss them, Tahoma (yes from MS) is by far the best desktop font (renders nicely non-aliased)
Someone else also asked this a while back, check the archive maybe
I'm really liking the Deja Vu Sans and Deja Vu Sans Mono. Much better than even Tahoma, and creates a more consistent look for fixed with stuff.
participants (3)
-
Hans van der Merwe -
Lívio Cipriano -
suse＠rio.vg