[SuSE Linux] [SuSE Linux] SuSE derailed? READ THIS
S.Toms wrote:
Very nice article on ZD-Net, should make alot of people feel better about SuSE's place in Linux's standings. Also makes for a very nice read as they compare SuSE, RH and Caldera to WinNT. Guess who lost miserably??
<A HREF="http://www.zdnet.com/sr/stories/issue/0,4537,387506,00.html"><A HREF="http://www.zdnet.com/sr/stories/issue/0,4537,387506,00.html</A">http://www.zdnet.com/sr/stories/issue/0,4537,387506,00.html</A</A>>
Well yes and no. What the article states in laymans terms is that SuSE is a good product. This is good and it provides an opportunity and incentive for SuSE managment to review their strategy and marketing campaign in NA. Lets just say it constitutes a good break. IMHO SuSE strategy in NA is seriousely flawed, no major partnerships have been annouced since the partnering with Applix. This was a good move as Corels products are not ready and StarOffice is simply not up to the task...yet. 6.0 will ship with Star. Other than that no major partenerships or side deals. All major announcements that have moved Linux forwared into the commercial arena came from Redhat. While this is great news for Linux and nubies (early adopters) it certainly does little to level the playing field for linux distro vendors or consumers. Our shop runs on RH, we have too, to survive. I personally run SuSE at home for all the right reasons, but try and convince anyone else of its merrits, especially non-users. Corp views are clear Linux = RedHat At best the article hopefully will wake up SuSE managment of the portential in NA. IMHO nothing would hurt linux and its penetration of the corporat world more, 'in the long run', than an identification of Linux with one brand name, even if that name was SuSE. We need players, choice and some diversification. A strong represtation by a number two player is urgently needed. Right now its a toss up between Caldera and SuSE who each have less than 100f the total US install base where as the rest is split quite unevenly by RH and Debian. As Debian will not likely ever go commercial that leaves SuSE or Cladera with quite a lot of work ahead of them just to catch up. This is where we come in. SuSE will only invest some seriouse money into advertizing and partnerships if we the user base keep pointing it out to them and encourage them. Linux is about consumer choice as open source trasnfers the ownership, responsibility and managment of the OS from the manufacturer to the developers and end users. Cant look under the hood with other systems. I think if we just keep at it we cold possibly see some greater levels of commitment to NA. While they are doing well in Europe things are not that cozy on this side of the pond. PLease be informed that this is not an anti-RH rant, quite the contrary. IF the SuSE team was as active in NA as the guys in the red hats...I think we would all be better campers. regards chris - To get out of this list, please send email to majordomo@suse.com with this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e Check out the SuSE-FAQ at <A HREF="http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/"><A HREF="http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/</A">http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/</A</A>> and the archiv at <A HREF="http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html"><A HREF="http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html</A">http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html</A</A>>
chris herrnberger wrote:
PLease be informed that this is not an anti-RH rant, quite the contrary. IF the SuSE team was as active in NA as the guys in the red hats...I think we would all be better campers.
Well no one has said this yet so I will. The corporations and school systems who are choosing to back a linux product in America, have chosen Redhat because it is an American Product. It's that simple. SuSe is a German Product and you won't find any American corporate executives backing it as the "american standard". But they will all admit it is a good product. Another reason, Suse is held back, is that Yast is not fully GPL'ed ; whereas all of Redhat is. Corporate lawyers are very tuned into these little things. After playing around with Redhat, I see that Yast is a superior setup tool, and it makes sense that the Suse people want to keep it proprietary. All efforts to promote linux is good. Redhat's success has made becoming a "unix programmer" more viable for everyone. Distributions will come and go. I expect to see a whole bunch of new distributions, as smart college kids try to implement their personal visions. Bigger isn't always better. A smaller development team means lower overhead, and may make it easier for Suse to make it thru any coming "lean times". Longevity is what you want in a distribution. SuSe seems to be "right on track" with looking toward the future. I actually feel more secure with SuSe's future than Redhat's. Redhat is getting so involved with school's and big corporations, that it won't be long before they get caught up in disputes over "direction". - To get out of this list, please send email to majordomo@suse.com with this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e Check out the SuSE-FAQ at <A HREF="http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/"><A HREF="http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/</A">http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/</A</A>> and the archiv at <A HREF="http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html"><A HREF="http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html</A">http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html</A</A>>
participants (2)
-
chrish123@sympatico.ca
-
zentara@mindspring.com