Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 23:15:56 -0800 (PST) From: "S.Toms" <tomas@primenet.com> Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0012282313110.24979-100000@scarydream.smotrs.org> Subject: kde2 package name I know part of this was covered, the naming of the packages, but I can't recall if this was a SuSE thing or if it was done by the KDE team itself. I can see maybe it being the KDE team in reference to the KDE specific packages, but what about packages like audiofile which used to be called audiofil. -- S.Toms - tomas@primenet.com - www.primenet.com/~tomas SuSE Linux v7.0+ - Kernel 2.2.17 The rule on staying alive as a forcaster is to give 'em a number or give 'em a date, but never give 'em both at once. -- Jane Bryant Quinn
Message-ID: <3A4C8D90.B34B9426@compro.net> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2000 08:11:44 -0500 From: Mark Hounschell <markh@compro.net> Subject: Re: [SLE] kde2 package name "S.Toms" wrote:
I know part of this was covered, the naming of the packages, but I can't recall if this was a SuSE thing or if it was done by the KDE team itself. I can see maybe it being the KDE team in reference to the KDE specific packages, but what about packages like audiofile which used to be called audiofil.
-- S.Toms - tomas@primenet.com - www.primenet.com/~tomas SuSE Linux v7.0+ - Kernel 2.2.17
The rule on staying alive as a forcaster is to give 'em a number or give 'em a date, but never give 'em both at once. -- Jane Bryant Quinn
Does rpm -q show bothe packages installed? Mine doesn't. It only shows audiofile-0.1.9-3 and I never uninstalled audiofil. -- Mark Hounschell markh@compro.net
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2000 16:36:06 -0800 (PST) From: "S.Toms" <tomas@primenet.com> Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0012291634170.24979-100000@scarydream.smotrs.org> Subject: Re: kde2 package name On Fri, 29 Dec 2000, Mark Hounschell wrote: mh> "S.Toms" wrote: mh> > mh> > I know part of this was covered, the naming of the packages, but I can't mh> > recall if this was a SuSE thing or if it was done by the KDE team mh> > itself. I can see maybe it being the KDE team in reference to the KDE mh> > specific packages, but what about packages like audiofile which used to be mh> > called audiofil. mh> > mh> > -- mh> > S.Toms - tomas@primenet.com - www.primenet.com/~tomas mh> > SuSE Linux v7.0+ - Kernel 2.2.17 mh> > mh> > The rule on staying alive as a forcaster is to give 'em a number or mh> > give 'em a date, but never give 'em both at once. mh> > -- Jane Bryant Quinn mh> > mh> mh> Does rpm -q show bothe packages installed? Mine doesn't. It only shows mh> audiofile-0.1.9-3 and I never uninstalled audiofil. mh> It doesn't show both of them installed, but it does jack up the dependencies an awful lot, whereas before I was getting only 2 dependency noties, now I'm getting what looks like 20 because they insist on audiofil rather then audiofile. -- S.Toms - tomas@primenet.com - www.primenet.com/~tomas SuSE Linux v7.0+ - Kernel 2.2.17 A Riverside, California, health ordinance states that two persons may not kiss each other without first wiping their lips with carbolized rosewater.
"S.Toms" wrote:
On Fri, 29 Dec 2000, Mark Hounschell wrote:
mh> "S.Toms" wrote: mh> > mh> > I know part of this was covered, the naming of the packages, but I can't mh> > recall if this was a SuSE thing or if it was done by the KDE team mh> > itself. I can see maybe it being the KDE team in reference to the KDE mh> > specific packages, but what about packages like audiofile which used to be mh> > called audiofil. mh> > mh> > -- mh> > S.Toms - tomas@primenet.com - www.primenet.com/~tomas mh> > SuSE Linux v7.0+ - Kernel 2.2.17 mh> > mh> > The rule on staying alive as a forcaster is to give 'em a number or mh> > give 'em a date, but never give 'em both at once. mh> > -- Jane Bryant Quinn mh> > mh> mh> Does rpm -q show bothe packages installed? Mine doesn't. It only shows mh> audiofile-0.1.9-3 and I never uninstalled audiofil. mh>
It doesn't show both of them installed, but it does jack up the dependencies an awful lot, whereas before I was getting only 2 dependency noties, now I'm getting what looks like 20 because they insist on audiofil rather then audiofile.
Maybe you need to upgrade rpm. Mine is rpm-3.0.5-0. When I installed audiofile it removed audiofil from the rpm database.
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq
-- Mark Hounschell markh@compro.net
----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Hounschell" <markh@compro.net> Cc: "SuSE Linux English" <suse-linux-e@suse.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2001 4:31 AM Subject: Re: Re: kde2 package name
mh> mh> Does rpm -q show bothe packages installed? Mine doesn't. It only shows mh> audiofile-0.1.9-3 and I never uninstalled audiofil. mh>
It doesn't show both of them installed, but it does jack up the dependencies an awful lot, whereas before I was getting only 2 dependency noties, now I'm getting what looks like 20 because they insist on audiofil rather then audiofile.
Maybe you need to upgrade rpm. Mine is rpm-3.0.5-0. When I installed audiofile it removed audiofil from the rpm database.
Oh, it removed the previous package no problem, but, what I said was that there are still packages that still think it should be called audiofil and because audiofil is nolonger installed, there are failed dependencies. :)
-- Mark Hounschell markh@compro.net
-- S.Toms - tomas@primenet.com - www.primenet.com/~tomas SuSE Linux v7.0+ - Kernel 2.2.17 "Speed is subsittute fo accurancy."
"S.Toms" wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Hounschell" <markh@compro.net> Cc: "SuSE Linux English" <suse-linux-e@suse.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2001 4:31 AM Subject: Re: Re: kde2 package name
mh> mh> Does rpm -q show bothe packages installed? Mine doesn't. It only shows mh> audiofile-0.1.9-3 and I never uninstalled audiofil. mh>
It doesn't show both of them installed, but it does jack up the dependencies an awful lot, whereas before I was getting only 2 dependency noties, now I'm getting what looks like 20 because they insist on audiofil rather then audiofile.
Maybe you need to upgrade rpm. Mine is rpm-3.0.5-0. When I installed audiofile it removed audiofil from the rpm database.
Oh, it removed the previous package no problem, but, what I said was that there are still packages that still think it should be called audiofil and because audiofil is nolonger installed, there are failed dependencies. :)
I'll be da?>&*. Your right. It seems that the package xpm also is giving the same dependancy problem for me. It was removed with the install of x4.0 rpms from suse a long time ago. Surely there is a way with rpm to clean up the rpm data-base. Maybe what we wanted is for rpm NOT to have removed the old packages from the database but just overwrite the old package. -- Mark Hounschell dmarkh@cfl.rr.com
participants (5)
-
Mark Hounschell -
Mark Hounschell -
markh＠compro.net
-
S.Toms -
tomas＠primenet.com