RE:[opensuse] why not ship kernel with usb_suspend enabled?
Oh, Ok i thought that only if you passed the kernel option to enable it would actually have any effect on the system. Regards, Vasilis ----- Original Message ---- From: Marcus Meissner <meissner@suse.de> To: Carlos E. R. <robin.listas@telefonica.net> Cc: OS-en <opensuse@opensuse.org> Sent: Sunday, December 9, 2007 8:18:14 PM Subject: Re: [opensuse] why not ship kernel with usb_suspend enabled? On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 09:09:55PM +0100, Carlos E. R. wrote:
The Sunday 2007-12-09 at 09:43 -0800, vasilis christaras wrote:
I was wondering why the kernel is not shipped with usb_suspend
enabled and Because it was not considered stable enough yet. Ciao, Marcus -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org ____________________________________________________________________________________ Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs ____________________________________________________________________________________ Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 02:41:17PM -0800, vasilis christaras wrote:
Oh, Ok i thought that only if you passed the kernel option to enable it would actually have any effect on the system.
No, the kernel we shipped with 10.3 did not have very good usb suspend support, and would break a number of known printers and scanners. So we thought it was safer to not break hardware that was previously working :) thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
participants (2)
-
Greg KH -
vasilis christaras