On 25/03/17 05:41 PM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
So you ask them! Most certainly not. So your suggestion that I do was hypocrital at best.
No, I did not ask. It was you who asked "why is anybody still using Flash?" and I answered. I'm not interested in asking the sites, I more or less know the answer, and they will not answer to me.
BTDT and Carlos is correct. They ignore you. Some places, it seems, the use of flash is too deeply involved in their business process. Carlos, as well as my clients, are an example of that on the receiving end because its like that for some producers. While the change to HTLM5 is easy for the consumers because of the way browsers have been developed, it seems it is not so easy for content providers. Then there's archival material. I'm sure that Youtube has great tools for production & conversion, and I'm sure that converting from the format produced by phonecams and consumer grade DSLR to HTML5 is easy for them and they have to deal with such volume as to make it worth while. As for <strike>holdouts</strike> places like Brighttalk and CNet, who knows. -- A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting frowned upon? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org