On 4/29/23 01:10, Per Jessen wrote:
I was unable to segment that /64 to separate physical interfaces on the router. /66 wouldn't work, for example. You and Carlos are kindred spirits, you both have this uncanny knack for quietly shifting the goalposts:-)
What else are goalposts good for if not shifting?
What has "transparent public access to a /64" got to do with your inability to split a /64 on your router, at the time?
As has been mentioned once or twice over the last week, to work with less than a /64, you need dhcpv6. The stateless auto config will only work with /64.
Yes, I seem to remember that from my efforts of a few years ago.
For my home network I use 2001:db8:7d68:1 - with two distinct subnets:
2001:db8:7d68:1:ff99:ffff::/96 - unknown/foreign/guest devices 2001:db8:7d68:1:ff99::/80 - known devices without static addr 2001:db8:7d68:1::/64 - static addresses.
This is what I was trying to do on my router, where each subnet is on it's own physical Ethernet interface. I couldn't do it, either due to my ignorance, the Xyxel router, or my ISP. It's been maybe a few years, should I expend the effort and try again? Why? It works perfectly well with IPv4. By the way, how do you mitigate the rogue RA problem? There's even a RFC about it? (RFC-6104) As mentioned, I've been affected by this at work. Regards, Lew