Alle 20:29, lunedì 29 aprile 2002, Jerry Feldman ha scritto:
Good question I would like answered. I asked a question either with SuSE or with my LUG about the relative performance of the various jounal file systems, and all paid a performance penalty. The only performance plus of the journaling file system was in terms of crash recovery where the fsck is much faster with a journal than without.
That is not true in my experience. I have 5 gigabyte free in my hard drive so I have been doing some filesystem benchmarking with bonnie++. ReiserFS is the fastest, XFS follows with a small gap. Ext3 is slower than Ext2, and both are not too far from ReiserFS and XFS. JFS looks slower. I have been testing it with 500m file, as bonnie++ advices. Praise