On 2018-09-04 11:50 a.m., Richard Brown wrote:
openSUSE is not magic, and despite advances in artificial intelligence
Well ${OBSCENITY} to 'artificial intelligence' as an excuse. We've had AI as a moving target for over 50 years now, and basically it is a algorithm backed by a database; the database is the 'learning' (which shouldn't surprise anyone) and THAT is what 'modifies' the behaviour of code. David Rankin points out, quite correctly and pertinently:
It seems like there should be a preliminary question (or two), or at least an information box on the YAST partitioning page that could provide guidance here. Especially if it will help avoid problems.
Or a number of question. And a number of problems, And a better explanation to the user of limits and risks as David mentions There's nothing magic or mystic or difficult about "AI". I remember discussion with Terry Hewitt back in 1976 a problem with label-tags of on-screen objects as they were dragged across the screen. He said that solving it was algorithmically 'confounding'. Now we think nothing of it while programming GUIs and games. He also said that it wasn't worth bothering with as users would put up the overlapping of labels and objects and figure things out for themselves. -- A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting frowned upon? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org