Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
It is exactly "broken in a number of ways". <http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1627.html> <http://www.cs.utk.edu/~moore/what-nats-break.html>
That's all?? Gee, what a mess. (hmm, can't say any of those issues have ever affected my use of NAT).
when the problems mentioned turn out to be either contrived or non-problems.
So everything that doesn't specifically apply to your use-case is "contrived"?
Please refrain from putting words in my mouth. I've only spoken about the two examples of active FTP and ssh-accessing multiple hosts behind a NAT.
Do you enjoy double-SSH-ing? Why bother? Wouldn't it be nice not to have to futz with port-forwards?
I couldn't care less, but it's company policy only to allow external ssh access via the gateway anyway. -- Per Jessen, Zürich (13.5°C) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org