Greg Wallace wrote:
On Thursday, June 30, 2005 @ 4:26 AM, I wrote:
On Wednesday, June 29, 2005 @ 7:23 AM, Art Fore wrote:
<suse-linux-e@lists.suse.com>: ezmlm-reject: fatal: message already has a Mailing-List header (maybe I should be a sublist) (#5.7.2)
--- Below this line is a copy of the message.
Return-Path: <art.fore@comcast.net> Received: (qmail 26996 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2005 15:18:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO Relay2.suse.de) (195.135.221.8) by 0 with SMTP; 29 Jun 2005 15:18:38 -0000 Received: from Relay2.suse.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Relay2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41B43451E for <suse-linux-e@lists.suse.com>; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 17:18:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from Relay2.suse.de ([127.0.0.1]) by Relay2.suse.de (Relay2 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 06960-09 for <suse-linux-e@lists.suse.com>; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 17:18:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx2.suse.de (ns2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by Relay2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 150234509 for <suse-linux-e@lists.suse.com>; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 17:18:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from sccrmhc14.comcast.net (sccrmhc14.comcast.net [204.127.202.59]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B6951D29B for <suse-linux-e@suse.com>; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 17:18:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.121.33] (adsl-71-129-145-33.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net[71.129.145.33]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc14) with ESMTP id <20050629151826014003p666e>; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 15:18:32 +0000 Message-ID: <42C2BBBB.5080804@comcast.net> Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 08:18:19 -0700 From: Art Fore <art.fore@comcast.net> User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: suse-linux-e@suse.com Subject: SPAM: Evolution-Thunderbird Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at Relay2.suse.de X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=5.4 tagged_above=-20.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_80, DNS_FROM_RFC_POST, DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS X-Spam-Level: ***** X-Spam-Flag: YES
This line seems to stick out --
Received: from [192.168.121.33]
Why is there no name attached to 192.168.121.33? To a spam filter, it would seem it would look like it was coming from an address with no real sender (maybe like it's being generated from some sort of spam engine). Sort of like you getting a note from me and the "From" being blank.
Greg Wallace
I have previously relayed messages through my email account from inside another network and gotten messages back saying I wasn't a registered user. Maybe if the address had been missing my name I would have gotten a spam message instead. Are the messages you have been sending that have been getting trough being relayed, or are you sending those directly from your suse-linux-e registered email address?
Greg W.
I am sending from thunderbird on Windows (unfortunately since I am at work) on our internal network. the 192.168.121.33 is my ip address on the network which is behind a firewall (Sonic I think). Our internet connection is through a PacBell DSL connection. My email accound is on Comcast.net. I don't understand why my machine ip address is shown, seems like that should be from the NAT on the routers.firewall. Also. some email does get through such as the original from this thread and some of my replys. Would like to see the headers to those emails that do get by, but can't do that. Art