On 01/05/14 20:32, Felix Miata wrote:
On 2014-05-01 19:49 (GMT+1000) Basil Chupin composed:
And as far as the TV or even the monitor is concerned, the last 2 monitors I have used had 1920x1080 resolution and were only capable of handling sRGB colours. My new 27" monitor handles 2560x1440 resolution
2560x1440 isn't really all that special @ 108.8 DPI. A 21" 1920x1080 is 104.9 DPI, and a 20" 1920x1080 is 110.2 DPI, so the more common 21.5" 1920x1080 would be very close to the same quality you have. Yours is mostly just bigger than the average (96DPI) puter screen, but with fonts of any given px size 22.14532% smaller due to the higher density.
and 99% of the full Adobe colour range (some 1.07 billion 10-bit colours). If you think that this does not make a difference to what appears on the screen, then try and see for yourself.
Only on the best of days can I detect the slightest difference between 16 bit and 24 bit color. Any more color detail would be totally lost on me, and most in the 50+ range.
Your eyes may no be used to see such a colour range nor would you expecting to see this range if you never have the need for it. But if you have anything to do with photography and photo editing then compare a photo on the normal monitor and one such as the one I described and you will immediately see the difference. BC -- Using openSUSE 13.1, KDE 4.13.0 & kernel 3.14.2-1 on a system with- AMD FX 8-core 3.6/4.2GHz processor 16GB PC14900/1866MHz Quad Channel RAM Gigabyte AMD3+ m/board; Gigabyte nVidia GTX660 GPU -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org