Good evening, Thank you for continuing to understand, on my side I'm quite lost and I ask if it's suddenly a bug or a function? Should we make a bug report on our bugzilla or not? And since for my part, I do not understand this story for the masses, which nevertheless seems to be simple for you, and moreover, since I translate from Russian into a language which is not mine and which so far i can't say if it's a good translation, i'm not the ideal guy to point this bug (if it really is) on the buzilla. Cordially. Le vendredi 05 février 2021 à 16:51 +0100, Carlos E. R. a écrit :
On 05/02/2021 16.36, Dave Howorth wrote:
On Fri, 5 Feb 2021 13:29:15 +0100 "Carlos E. R." <> wrote:
On 05/02/2021 11.56, Dave Howorth wrote:
On Fri, 05 Feb 2021 08:57:55 +0100 Per Jessen <per@computer.org> wrote:
Anton Aylward wrote:
On 2021-02-04 6:03 p.m., L A Walsh wrote: > > However, cut+paste of the text works, though I still have > no clue what they are talking about:
Indeed. How can you have a RFC compliant DNS query that isn't 't either UPD or TCP?
DoH is becoming popular. (which does involve TCP of course). RFC8484
The latest router upgrade I got supports DoT instead. I think I prefer DoH.
Could you point to some explanation for dummies? ;-)
google dot doh dummies and take your pick (ignore the dog things, they're probably not relevant :)
Thanks :-)
My google foo lacks somewhat ;-)