Ken Archer wrote:
Personally, I don't see that big a difference between 5.2 and 5.3. That is why I am waiting for 6.0. But on the subject of broken distributions, has anyone on this list taken a look recently at the erratta directory at ftp.redhat.com? They had 50 updates within two weeks after they released 5.1. SuSE people count your blessings. I don't like working for any distribution. SuSE is the first distribution that works for ME.
I absolutely agree. At my work, we run linux almost exclusively, and of course, they had to be redhat folks. well, i've tried to put ssh and many other necessary programs/daemons on it, but the only one that works well, the first time, every time, is my little p75 suse box. even though i don't have 5.3, im still looking forward to trying it out. what i would like to know, now that we've heard many opinions of the bad stuff, how about the improvements made? -- Aaron Seelye Running S.u.S.E. 5.2 <A HREF="http://revolution.3-cities.com/~roberto"><A HREF="http://revolution.3-cities.com/~roberto</A">http://revolution.3-cities.com/~roberto</A</A>> - To get out of this list, please send email to majordomo@suse.com with this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e