the updated packages :-) I would have thought that including software
actually worked with the distribution would have been a priority. My
Is it too much to expect that when I *pay* for a Linux distro from SuSE
----- Original Message ----- From: "Volker Kuhlmann" <kuhlmav@elec.canterbury.ac.nz> To: <suse-linux-e@suse.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 12:01 AM Subject: Re: [SLE] Installing VMware that that
they have checked that the software that comes with it works?
1) Did you ever try to ask this of M$? How far did you get? How much $$ did you pay for getting nowhere?
This happens every time. I have had very little problems with MS. I am moving to Linux in general because I don't like them. Personally I have paid $0 on MS products, I use NT workstation at work and work pays for it.
2) It's complete utter garbage. The vmware which comes with the distribution works perfectly.
Oh really? well tell that to my version of VMware. The first error I get off of a vanilla install was that the verson.h file does not match my running kernel and then when I have fixed that I get the error that VMware will not run with my 2.4.4-64GB-SMP kernel installed which was the kernel that was installed by default when I installed 7.2 personal.
So you decided to install your own version of vmware, downloaded from somewhere. And it's suse's fault if it doesn't work? Wait a minute.
No, the version that came with 7.2 personal did not work
I have the 2.4.4-64GB-SMP kernel installed. Am I right in saying i need to install the 2.4.4-4GB-UP or something kernel?
No. (Unless you only have 1 CPU, in that case installing the SMP kernel isn't sensible.)
I have 1 CPU, the SMP kernel installed by default as part of the 7.2 personal install.
Chances are http://volker.orcon.net.nz/linux/linux.html tells you what you need to know.
Thanks I will check it out. Will.