Carlos E. R. wrote:
Well, this is also interesting - on the main router:
# ip -6 neigh | egrep '2446|ba7a|39b0' fe80::12d0:7aff:fef6:39b0 dev eth0 lladdr 10:d0:7a:f6:39:b0 STALE fe80::96a1:a2ff:fea4:2446 dev eth0 FAILED fe80::96a1:a2ff:fea3:ba7a dev eth0 FAILED
Those are the three nanopis, all on wifi. There is the reason the latter two (nano1 and nano2) are not getting any RAs - the router can't talk to them. nano3 has been running for a couple of days, I'm waiting for it to be failed too.
I don't understand that FAILED state. From my desktop, I'm logged in to both nano1 and nano2 over ssh, for days. It works fine.
The only thing that set those two nanos apart is that they are connected over another wifi AP (we have three), a Netgear WG602v3. I don't understand why there should be an issue with link-local addresses.
Well, that's what I'm trying to say, that link-local addresses have issues.
Carlos, that is just plainly wrong. They are required for IPv6 to work at all. They don't have "issues". The problem I'm having (finally narrowed down) is why the router and other machines do not receive neighbour advertisements from those two addresses (of the nanopis). -- Per Jessen, Zürich (2.4°C) http://www.hostsuisse.com/ - dedicated server rental in Switzerland. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org