![](https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/6fa20d51d4e457797fcbb9b9d420a2db.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On Sun, 11 Jun 2006 17:48:27 -0400, you wrote:
On Sun, 2006-06-11 at 22:18 +0100, Peter Onion wrote:
In my experience since 5.2 (the first SuSE I used) upto 10.0 SuSE used to get it right first time... Now it seems they are following the M$ method of letting their customers find the bugs in new releases :-( Peter (sticking with 10.0).
Not singling Peter out, he's been far more tame than many here.
First off -- to show I'm quite unbiased towards Novell-SuSE -- I'm a heavily biased Fedora Core user (have been since Red Hat Linux 4.2) for my personal/professional desktop, and I have to admit that I make more money deploying RHEL/RHD than SLES/NLD for enterprises (although I still have a good amount of SLES 8.x/9.x experience). I came on to this list to play with SL 10.1 for x86-64 after continuing to deal with a few Red Hat decisions on x86-64 that continued to erk me -- although some other, key differences between FC and SL have now kept me with FC (not of any fault or limitation of SL -- it's a long story).
Small bit of irony for you - I'm currently looking at FC5 because SuSE 10.1 is such a hash on my desktop here.... Mike- -- If you're not confused, you're not trying hard enough. -- Please note - Due to the intense volume of spam, we have installed site-wide spam filters at catherders.com. If email from you bounces, try non-HTML, non-encoded, non-attachments, -- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com