-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Mathias Homann Gesendet: So. 02.10.2016 09:11 An: opensuse@opensuse.org Betreff: Re: [opensuse] interesting reading about systemd
Am Sonntag, 2. Oktober 2016, 08:35:36 CEST schrieb stakanov@freenet.de:
Found on Phoronix and thought to share.
" target="_blank">https://www.agwa.name/blog/post/how_to_crash_systemd_in_one_tweet
on Leap 42.1:
mathias@kirika:~> NOTIFY_SOCKET=/run/systemd/notify systemd-notify "" Failed to notify init system: No such file or directory
as a habit, by now I take blog posts that claim that systemd is a gigantic failure with an equally gigantic grain of salt.
Cheers MH
Well, to tell the truth, he is not saying this. His first point is that the way it is programmed (especially the "extra-gear") is not done as he would expect due to security concerns. His second point is that using interfaces that are only usable through systemd are like a vendor lock in. And in this I am quite able to follow the argument, things should stay modular. That his opinion is obviously not unbiased is already self explicative by the title. The fact that I did post it here is not to say: I endorse. But just to make it accessible. Because I think he has some interesting arguments. May be taken with salt and/or pepper. Question of personal taste :-) - --- Die Bundesliga hat begonnen! Alle Tore, alle Ergebnisse, alle News: Pocket Liga jetzt im https://app.adjust.com/dpynzd oder https://app.adjust.com/dpynzd herunterladen - kostenlos! -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org