-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 2015-06-01 19:59, jdd wrote:
Le 01/06/2015 19:27, Anton Aylward a écrit :
* Single "superblock" and file allocation table is vulnerable.
there are two of them :-)
True.
and I have no control over the file system used by ma cemeras and camcorders :-(
True.
if not I would like better ext2 :-)
Actually... these flash devices (not SSDs) are optimized for FAT. The start sectors of the stick or card get smaller actual sectors (not the proper name, true), because in that area there are much more writes; for each file that changes something, there is a corresponding change in the FAT, the directory table, or both. So they make that region more resilient to multiple writes. I had a link that explained this. Found another one: <http://lwn.net/Articles/518988/> There is a mention in the comments (by the article author) about this, and that f2fs uses the same region. - -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 13.1 x86_64 "Bottle" (Minas Tirith)) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAlVsvaEACgkQja8UbcUWM1zwUAD+IjPW9d0nN+vWasbhc8Qya0KD LeNYjqtEY8gL5MTWjcQA/2Od+zJj8vD5mILHCHy556b0UdDRULpxwyYSOrP0wZVX =LQCO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org