2 Apr
2007
2 Apr
'07
01:01
On Sunday 01 April 2007, sfreilly@adelphia.net wrote:
I believe that would only show there if they actually declared that they own the stock. Or, they have the ability to use another name, common practice.
Once you own over 5% you can no longer hide behind another name such as your brokerage or a shell company set up for that purpose. There would be no reason for IBM to throw 50 million publicly toward Novell in a move to assure continued access to Suse for their eServer products, and then to try to hide the fact that they own stock. Since Novell is a 2.49Billion company, you can see that 50million is a pittance. -- _____________________________________ John Andersen