![](https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/cabdbf4d350ab6a15265803acab1634d.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Carlos E. R. said the following on 01/04/2013 08:19 AM:
El 2013-01-04 a las 08:09 -0500, Patrick Shanahan escribió:
I do not understand your position. You have a tool which you cannot understand it's operation (and cannot be bothered to try) and profess it's importance on "big iron".
I would hope that a package distributed by openSUSE to work correctly out of the box, with no false possitives.
Ah, right, the world of absolutes. So, remove spamassassin and clamv. They are both going to produce false positives. And lets not bother doing risk analysis since its _only_ probabilistic and _might_ be wrong _sometimes_. Sort of like predicting the outcome of elections, eh? While we're about it, I'd love to have software that works "correctly" for *MY* definition of correctly (as opposed to the developers) and is *absolutely* bug free and never crashes no matter what input I give it or hardware I run it on. So once we start removing packages that don't meet your (and my) criteria we're not going to have a lot left. Welcome to the world of absolutes. Such worlds are often populated by religious extremists, so I think I'll live with uncertainties and flaws, thank you. -- You can only protect your liberties in this world by protecting the other man's freedom. You can only be free if I am free. -- Clarence S. Darrow -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org