-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Herbert Graeber wrote:
Will Shouldn't Novell be pushing Nokia to be doing something about this now? They own QT and could at least dish out some APIs for syncing with their phones.
All the current phones use SyncML, I believe, so this is addressed by the SyncML akonadi resource coming from upstream.
An article in latest german Linux Magazine say that SyncML will die, because Apple and Nokia will support ActiveSync. I doubt waht it is good for to support a sync protocol that is close tied with Exchange Server. Maybe it's only a form of FUD.
Depends really whether you are talking about network synchronisation of user data, or thing like phone backup. Interesting though, as the major Open Source projects (e.g. Funambol) and their commercial versions support SyncML (ActiveSync is a M$ proprietary protocol). Both the Java and C++ client libraries for Funambol are quite mature (and should work with other OMA compliant SyncML servers). The problem is that OpenSync never actually delivered anything obviously useful to anyone outside the project (e.g. API specs) last time I looked (a long time ago admittedly).
I think Nokia should be rewriting all their sync software (even on Windows) in QT or KDE.
Maybe be they use Qt for their ActiveSync software...
QT is a desktop interface, SyncML is a synchronisation standard (as defined by OMA). These are different things. The latter aspect is not Nokias problem, this seems to be more of an issue someone coming up with something that works in the KDE environment. Nokia have been disinterested in producing support for non-Windows platforms for direct connectivity of phones for some time. As in recent times in some parts of the world (e.g. UK) access to the tools required modify or examine the phone internals is restricted, it presents some problems for those wishing to work on alternatives.
I hope so too!
I really hope what the article states will not become reality...
Given the ActiveSync is strongly associated with Windows Mobile, there is not a lot mileage in replacing ones own standards with a competitors standard. Dual support probably will come though.
Herbert
- -- ============================================================================== I have always wished that my computer would be as easy to use as my telephone. My wish has come true. I no longer know how to use my telephone. Bjarne Stroustrup ============================================================================== -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkuQ6PwACgkQasN0sSnLmgKkSgCg2Wrs6PwLFJ8z1zV2eN/QBzkf DjUAn1b01cScFBGm+7Ouu9dBea8N6ds9 =9dfd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org