Hi, On Tuesday, September 06, 2005 at 13:28:38, Andreas Simon wrote:
On Tuesday 06 September 2005 13:02, Henne Vogelsang wrote:
No need for yet another bugtracking system. We already have a bugzilla up dont we? :)
Yes, but is Novell willing to use this for all the contributer's packages? We will see. For example Ubuntu's bugzilla is only for their supported main packages. Other packages (their universe and multiverse repositories) have a seperate bug-tracking system, they don't allow them in their main bugzilla.
I dont see a reason why we wouldnt allow that. (NOTE: im not involved with decisions about bugzilla in any way)
You are showing the classical reflex when it comes to this topic ;) You immediately invent a "inner circle" of people that decide whats good and whats bad. I understand that, that is my first reflex too. But thinking about it, that approach has a lot of disadvantages.
Yes it's the standard way of many projects. If there's an other way were it is still possible to maintain a high quality, well then even better. :-)
Thats exactly what we should try to find out together! Is there an other way were it is still possible to maintain a high quality? Henne -- Henne Vogelsang, Subsystems "Rules change. The Game remains the same." - Omar (The Wire)