Carlos E. R. wrote:
On 2012-09-23 15:58, Per Jessen wrote:
Carlos E. R. wrote:
sdc11 and sdb10 are partitions.
I know.
I presume they are not type 0xFD?
Yes, they are.
Telcontar:~ # fdisk -l | grep raid Disk /dev/md0 doesn't contain a valid partition table /dev/sdb10 148022973 173196764 12586896 fd Linux raid autodetect /dev/sdc13 450012843 475186634 12586896 fd Linux raid autodetect /dev/sda11 294824943 319998734 12586896 fd Linux raid autodetect
But if they are not in a RAID config, why do they have that type?
Yeah, the uuid in madm.conf doesn't match /dev/disk/by-uuid/ - I don't know if they are meant to match.
It is possible that the file belongs to an older raid that disappeared. Maybe I have to recreate the raid again in yast. Funny that the raid is mounted, anyway :-)
I'm guessing that the superblocks have been found, which is enough. -- Per Jessen, Zürich (19.6°C) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org