On 03/14/2016 02:50 PM, Ruben Safir wrote:
On 03/14/2016 06:43 PM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
On 2016-03-14 15:22, Anton Aylward wrote:
On 03/14/2016 09:42 AM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
So, yes, leave those spaces alone ;-)
I have come to think that this is a weak argument.
The fact is, if you are using btrfs, you need several subvolumes each tuned differently. As simple as that.
What, you do not like that lot of lines in df output? Well, that's df fault. It does not distinguish bind mounts either. We'd need new options to tell df to ignore certain stuff (like tmpfs). It has nothing to do with the installer, nor with discussing if btrfs is good or not. IF you use btrfs, you have to create those many subvolumes.
no - they need to stop polluting the name space with inapropriate data.
What exactly is inappropriate about subvolumes? df should not rely purely on data supplied by mtab and instead check to see if its listing a subvolume (subvol=/path/to or subvolid=XYZ). In other words df should be updated... -- Regards, Uzair Shamim