On 2023-04-05 15:04, Per Jessen wrote:
Carlos E. R. wrote:
And an ntp item I knew nothing about.
Bit of an odd one, with no route to 10.x.x.x, it's pointless. Do you see it in your chrony/ntp config? (just being curious). You can probably access it if you add a route for that network.
Oh, I can alright:
Laicolasse:~ # traceroute 10.22.64.1 traceroute to 10.22.64.1 (10.22.64.1), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 router.valinor (192.168.1.1) 2.509 ms 2.587 ms 2.722 ms 2 * * * 3 * * * 4 * * *
That just uses the default route, that won't work.
If you want to play with it, you could try:
ip addr add 10.22.64.99/24 dev wlan0
maybe you can then "ntpq 10.22.64.1".
or do you already have a route for it? try "ip route show" first.
I said that it does work, I get the time from them. I just failed to ping or tracerute them because they don't respond to pings. Laicolasse:~ # ip route show default via 192.168.1.1 dev wlan0 proto dhcp metric 600 192.168.0.0/16 dev wlan0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.2.18 metric 600 Laicolasse:~ #
Does it work?
Try this: chronyc sources
Laicolasse:~ # chronyc sources MS Name/IP address Stratum Poll Reach LastRx Last sample =============================================================================== ^- 10.22.64.1 6 9 275 20m +8995us[+9154us] +/- 168ms ^- b.st1.ntp.br 2 10 337 322 +2985us[+2985us] +/- 154ms ^+ ntppublic.uzh.ch 2 10 317 331 -3371us[-3371us] +/- 65ms ^+ 51-158-147-92.rev.poneyt> 2 10 375 907 -12ms[ -13ms] +/- 67ms ^+ server2.as2.ch 2 9 276 711 -5153us[-5829us] +/- 50ms ^+ dns4.masbytes.es 2 9 177 243 +4194us[+4194us] +/- 119ms ^+ gomadr.hojmark.net 2 10 373 87 -9835us[-9835us] +/- 59ms ^* 185.179.104.12 2 10 377 558 +2828us[+2152us] +/- 42ms ^+ 190.pool90-165-120.dynam> 2 9 367 104 -8711us[-8711us] +/- 54ms Laicolasse:~ #
Means I can not define a 10* network myself.
No it doesn't. You can still use 10.113.0.0, for instance.
I don't know what sections of the 10.* range telefónica is using. Probably the entire range, for clients, instead of using IPv6, remember. They use CGNAT. Not on landlines, apparently.
Well, it works for me, so we just have to figure out what's wrong with yours.
My laptop uses NM, I think your machine doesn't.
If my machine ("office68") had not been using NM, much of this exercise would have been pointless.
Ah, ok. Missed that. -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 15.4 x86_64 at Telcontar)