On Monday 31 May 2004 21:13, Bruce Marshall wrote:
On Monday 31 May 2004 04:03 pm, Terje J. Hanssen wrote:
Well, I started this thread and wish to round it off from my side. My aim was not "black or white" SuSE, but a feedback and constructive criticism to get a better and working 9.1, as I would expect from SuSE! And I feel sure that this gradually will be the case; SuSe simply have to the sooner the better. The main reason I guess, has been that the hungry Linux people have called for the new 2.6 kernel, and that SuSE eagered to show that they were the first to be able to deliver.
I think you wrong in blaming the kernel.
I've been running 2.6.4, 2.6.5, and now 2.6.6 kernels on 9.0 for quite some time now and have seen absolutely no problems. But then, SuSE seems to have a history of mucking up the vanilla kernels by patching and messing with things.
Patching indeed SuSE does ;) http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fedora-test-list&m=108465565022752&w=2 -- ____________________________________________________________________ Frederic P. Soulier frederic@wallaby.uklinux.net OpenPGP key available on http://www.keyserver.net 1024D/BA6700ED 49A6 8E8E 4230 8D41 1ADE B649 3203 1DD2 BA67 00ED _____________________________________________________________________