Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* Basil Chupin <blchupin@tpg.com.au> [08-15-06 09:03]:
Now, having said what I said above, can you point out to me ANY e-mail message which has come to this forum that has a REPLY-TO field in it?
There is/was, but I haven't seen one since December 2005. I have quoted relevant lines from the header.
X-Mailinglist: suse-linux-e X-Message-Number-for-archive: 258011 Delivered-To: mailing list suse-linux-e@suse.com Received: (qmail 11112 invoked from network); 24 Dec 2005 22:28:01 -0000 From: Gil Weber <gil@gilweber.com> Reply-To: gil@gilweber.com To: suse-linux-e@suse.com Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 17:27:58 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <121720052242.9430.43A494530007FE40000024D62200734076989A0207040207029D0A04@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: <121720052242.9430.43A494530007FE40000024D62200734076989A0207040207029D0A04@comcast.net>
Ah OK, so it happens. But, heck, one in all the thousands between 24/12/05 and today?! :-) . BTW, have you looked at the header(s) for messages from you? You are using gmail as your mail host and for some reason it appears that the SuSE server inserts not the Reply-To field but one which is doing the same thing but called Mail-Followup-To . Replying to one of your messages inserts only the SuSE server address. Rather interesting I think. Cheers. -- This computer is environment-friendly and is running on OpenSuSE 10.1