In return I hope you will ensure bugs are filed at bugs.kde.org vs kaddressbook and clearly marked as Regressions for all the features not yet restored to the Akonadi kaddressbook, so KDAB, who have assured me that the Akonadi ports in KDE 4.5 will be ready for production use, and the community kdepim developers, do not write off features as won't-be-missed.
The only regressions reported by you so far vs current kaddressbook are the missing fields at bko#222678 (see http://bit.ly/ayiL1u), there must be others.
I have already filed the missing feature bugs at BKO six weeks ago: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=222677 https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=222678 https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=222681 https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=222682 https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=222684 https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=222690 https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=223756 https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=223757 -- Dotan Cohen http://bido.com http://what-is-what.com Please CC me if you want to be sure that I read your message. I do not read all list mail. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org