-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 2015-03-09 18:23, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
В Mon, 09 Mar 2015 13:15:54 -0400 James Knott <> пишет:
Some email clients have a reply to list function, which does the job.
If someone replies to all and you are replying to a copy sent directly to you necessary information is not present in headers, so reply to list suddenly becomes reply to sender. I have been bitten by this quite often. Reply to all works always as both addresses are still present in both copies.
True. If you have a gmail account, and they send to you both emails (one direct, one on list, via "reply to all"), you only get the direct copy, because it arrives first at gmail, and they delete the second one. Thus, as you say, the reply to list functionality disappears on your side, and you have to reply to all... So it is best to respond to the mail list only, but we should not make a big deal of receiving another direct copy, from people using "reply to all". It is easy enough to filter them out (I have a procmail rule for that). Not all mailers offer a reply to list function. Old rule of thumb: do not offend, and do not be easily offended ;-) - -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 13.1 x86_64 "Bottle" (Minas Tirith)) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAlUAvZAACgkQja8UbcUWM1z0awD+KLP0adLv2OTlUUPArhdxPVQj uGjGt9QHT+xyyqDOipUA+gNZGSAVotPoH7FCW62Pv7WBijXt03sP6ifuIibJvitB =a43W -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org