On 2023-04-18 21:48, Per Jessen wrote:
Carlos E. R. wrote:
Internet Web is slow to load, with my testing stopped. This is a powerful machine. I have fast fibre.
None of that matters if the switch is poor.
Nono. The switch is good. TP-Link TL_SG1016DE And reread what I said: - I had one router per years, maybe a decade. No problems. - They changed the router: I had no connectivity at all to any of the two switches. - They changed the router again: I got connectivity, 30% packet loss. The router is CRAP (Mitrastar HGW-2501GN). Don't blame the switches. Just working with its config web page, you notice things that fail to work.
I would look at your general stats, not the ones you provoke.
ip -s link show
Isengard:
2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000 link/ether 4c:cc:6a:61:50:a1 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff RX: bytes packets errors dropped missed mcast 23406734220 16321239 0 5700 9849 79742
First impression - that's a _lot_ dropped and missed.
Told you.
telcontar:
2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000 link/ether 00:d8:61:a1:5a:bd brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff RX: bytes packets errors dropped missed mcast 1713292131 5141166 0 2838 0 73508
Also seems like a lot.
The difference is that the ping test runs on Isengard. Telcontar is the desktop machine. Running ethereal you can see retries. -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 15.4 x86_64 at Telcontar)