-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The Tuesday 2006-10-24 at 08:37 +0530, Duff Mckagan wrote:
Yes. I agree that the needful was done. Action was taken indeed. But still, Ed McCanless' post was tagged as SPAM.
I guess they have a new filter now. If the post doesn't have the word SuSE, then its tagged as SPAM.
The Bayes database was retrained. His email probably matched. Let me see... yes, that is: X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=6.4 tagged_above=-20.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_95, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE, DNS_FROM_RFC_POST X-Spam-Level: ****** X-Spam-Flag: YES The Bayes database is not yet trained perfectly. It will happen again, I'm afraid. - -- Cheers, Carlos E. R. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76 iD8DBQFFPfBMtTMYHG2NR9URAuwvAJ9zr+KIeik71qrNG0njGXwAeDiiuACfXyB8 8tosKCRy35nG6kSkJxfrA5I= =y6GT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----