William Gallafent wrote:
On Tuesday 15 August 2006 14:38, Basil Chupin wrote (in reply to Patrick Shanahan):
... it appears that the SuSE server inserts not the Reply-To field but one which is doing the same thing but called Mail-Followup-To. Replying to one of your messages inserts only the SuSE server address. Rather interesting I think.
Wow, that really looks like a can of worms!
http://www.mhonarc.org/archive/html/ietf-822/2005-05/msg00050.html
Anything to do with "standards" for messages, whether in Fidonet or Internet, will be a can of worms. Always has been, always will be. BTW, have you looked at the header of your message to Anders Johansson, "Proposed SuSE List Etiquette"? You posted that message as a new, original, message in THIS forum and as a result it does not contain a Reply-To field :-) . But this one (the one I am replying to now) was posted it seems in the suse-ot list and therefore the SuSE server inserted a Reply-To (reply to suse-ot list). All fascinating stuff, ain't it? :-) . One thing here, another thing there. Standards, standards, standards! "We heard of them! And we lives by them!" :-) . Cheers. -- This computer is environment-friendly and is running on OpenSuSE 10.1