On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 02:21:14PM +0200, Christoph Thiel wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005, houghi wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 05:47:34PM +0200, Christoph Thiel wrote:
Well, we never had metadata/repodata for the mozilla project dirs, but it actually makes sense to change this in my opinion.
Well, time to make a Yum resources page. Or just a sources page (or do we need to call it repositories?)
I guess it's something for the http://www.opensuse.org/Additional_YaST_Package_Repositories page, or a more generic "Package repositories for SUSE Linux" page. (metadata/repodata/yum (however you like to call them) repos are supported by the latests YaST, that's in 10.0).
I am thinking about how to do the fact that it is on mirrors and might be different on each one. This is what stpped me from adding the 'normal' sources in a better way. I am still not happy with the word "repositories" and am thinking of a page: YaST_sources (To be sure, is it Yast, YaST or YAST?) What are your opnions on the word "repositories"? The reason I like "Source" better is because it is used in Yast and will be less confusing for the beginner if only one word is used. This should include standard Yast, Yum, Aditional Yast and apt. An other way might be to have seperate pages for Yast, Yum and apt wich is perhaps a better approach. On such a page more detail can be given and as long as links to the other pages are given, it should be fine. houghi -- Quote correct (NL) http://www.briachons.org/art/quote/ Zitiere richtig (DE) http://www.afaik.de/usenet/faq/zitieren Quote correctly (EN) http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html