On Thursday 24 October 2013, Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
El 24/10/13 16:56, John Andersen escribió:
With all the WON'T FIX statuses freely doled out, why do some, which inflict breakage on everyone get accepted?
In this case, people requested systemd not to clean /tmp and not to use tmpfs, I personally disagree with this assessment completely, but that is just me, I am just another developer which may or may not have influence over the policies.
/tmp was never tmpfs on openSUSE. Suddenly then ones who don't want to change anything are guilty when things don't work anymore?
Also, when explaining some of the decisions made and the wild changes recommended to work around bugs, do you not realize it would take less of your time to fix the problem than it takes to explain it on various lists?
Well that's because you don't seem to understand that fixing a particular issue is not the main concern, maintaining such fixes and dealing with the potential fallouts however is.
You should think about the maintanance before breaking things. Just breaking them and then telling us that the fix requires too much maintanance is absurd. cu, Rudi -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org