On Friday 16 November 2012, Dr. Werner Fink wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 11:00:44PM +0100, Carlos E. R. wrote:
On 2012-11-15 22:42, Ruediger Meier wrote:
On Thursday 15 November 2012, Ken Schneider - openSUSE wrote:
just noticed that /etc/texmf/ls-R conatins lines like updmap.cfg.rpmsave and similar trash. I doubt this is wanted. Is it worth to bug report this?
They is not trash, They are config files the were saved by YaST during software updates.
Actually they are backups of config files and shouldn't be used.
Sometimes they have to be used, the new config doesn't have your changes. So you have to take a look and decide.
However, the file belongs to a package:
cer@minas-tirith:~> rpm -qf /etc/texmf/ls-R texlive-2010-4.6.noarch
and it should not contain lines referring any rpmsave file, that's a packaging error, although probably harmless.
The `ls-R' files are generated by texhash on the fly erven if listed int the spec file, e.g.
%attr(0664,root,%{texgrp}) %verify(not md5 size mtime mode) %{_texmfconfdir}/ls-R
Any bug report will be closed as invalid, as the`ls-R' are the data base for the kpathsea library used to find files below the TeX directory trees.
Werner
Btw: the main command used for this is ... guess .. `ls -LRa'
However ".rpmsave" files are just backups of formerly used config files and ".rpmnew" are there to be merged manually if wanted. Both ones shouldn't be used for anything. So either such files should not be written below /etc/texmf/ or they should grepped away from "ls -LRa". cu, Rudi -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org