** On Tue, 29 Jan 2002 19:44:43 -0500 Doug McGarrett <dougmack@i-2000.com>dashed off this message: **I would wait an extra two or three months to get the bugs out, **rather than have zillions of replacement files for months. whelp, who , then, would be testing to find your average security or other bugs? If you watch this list right after a new version shows up ;you'll see a flurry of activety as the earlly adopters among us discover on our assortment of variants to a "normal or average" computer , things that often just weren't a problen in house. And there will be the occassional security fixes , sometimes also discovered by a knowledgable SysAdmin , "just testing stuff" before deploying it system wide. I have actually had at least one problem solved I each of the new releases I've tried. AND sometimes one thing is fixed and something else still needs tweaking... And as we always seem to wind up saying during this recycled thread.. if you don't want or need something in the new release, truely you are not obligated to buy it. I know it didn't come up yet, but believe me, like the swallows and Capistrano , it will return about a nanosecond behind the news of a new release . <G> -- j afterthought : From the Department of Redundancy Dept.