I guess it's because we are human; we are all different. We all want different things, and we have different ideas. And that we strive for improvements. So I don't see why people won't argue of KDE, or have any kind of disagreements concerning it. And I certainly don't see why someone won't come up with something like a replacement for Qt. Hey, if person X says that chicken tastes bad, and he doesn't like chicken, and that chicken is bad for you, but if I like eating chicken I'll still continue to eat it. I don't give a damn about this guy X at all. My point is, if I find something good, something useful for me and I decide to use it, I may choose to just disregard anyone else's opinion. If they have a problem with that, then I shall let it remain their problem instead of trying to see what's up with them and make them a problem of mine. Also, if the chicken costs $1000 per pound, but I like it, I'll still buy the chicken and eat it! Just my personal opinion. Regards, Kenneth Tan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ C. J. Kenneth Tan E-mail: cjtan@acm.org Telephone: 1-403-220-8038 cjtan@ieee.org 1-403-606-4257 URL: <A HREF="http://www.cuug.ab.ca/~tanc"><A HREF="http://www.cuug.ab.ca/~tanc</A">http://www.cuug.ab.ca/~tanc</A</A>> Facsimile: 1-403-284-1980 "An engineer made programmer is one who attempts to solve a problem, A programmer made engineer is one who knows how to solve a problem." ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ On Mon, 20 Jul 1998 hekate@intergate.bc.ca wrote:
On Sun, 19 Jul 1998, Robert Williams wrote:
No one wants to support QT in the Linux world? Maybe you had better do some research. There are thousands of people using KDE and hence QT. Sounds like it is supported to me. How about SuSE? Caldera?
It's not that no one wants to support QT. Some people are fine with it. There is also a big bulk coolition who think Linux should be _truly_ free and don't like the LICENSE. PERIOD. If you had been following some of the exhanges on this ---try kernel list, slashdot, MANY Linux forums, you would _know_ that many people are not 'fine' with QT and have an issue with the it. Read up.
Right now, there is work being done on a free QT replacement. If everyone was fine with QT this wouldn't be the case. This is also why more people seem to be trying to work with gtk etc. Check out the Harmony project.
These are philosophical agreements on what Linux is about. I'm not saying I'm for or against QT. I do think it's an interesting issue, though.
The easiest way to describe Gnome is Kde sans native window manager. That is one of the reasons why I believe Gnome will eventually succeed and Kde will fail. It isn't proprietary, and people like a choice. The other is license. Gnome is built on gtk (GPL'd), kde on QT (non-GPL)
Gnome will be huge and has massive support. The KDE thing with QT will only strengthen GNOME, as some people that might not even have gotten that _into_ Gnome will do so just because they don't like QT. You have two set of supporters, the people that just plain like Gnome and where it's going and think it's kewl, and also the people that don't want to see KDE get too huge because of the issues that are brought to the table, like it or not, by QT.
-M
One is most dishonest towards one's God; he is not _permitted_ to sin.
mail: mjohnson@pop3.aebc.com
- To get out of this list, please send email to majordomo@suse.com with this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e
- To get out of this list, please send email to majordomo@suse.com with this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e